Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Acute pulmonary embolism: mortality prediction by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology risk stratification model

  1. Savas Ozsu⇑
  1. Karadeniz Technical University, School of Medicine, Dept of Pulmonary Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey
  1. Savas Ozsu, Karadeniz Technical University, School of Medicine, Dept of Pulmonary Medicine, Trabzon, 61080, Turkey. E-mail: savasozsu{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Patients with increased troponin alone are at intermediate risk according to ESC 2014 guidelines http://ow.ly/v2Jh304ovTw

To the Editor:

I eagerly read the recent article by Becattini et al. [1] entitled “Acute pulmonary embolism: mortality prediction by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology risk stratification model”. Those authors compared the prognosis of acute pulmonary thromboembolism in 906 patients according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines published in 2008 and 2014.

I would like to draw attention to a point in table 2 of the article. The authors reported that 59 patients were positive for troponin in the group composed of 196 patients with low risk levels. The 2014 ESC guidelines recommend that patients in Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class I–II or with a Simplified PESI score of 0, and elevated cardiac biomarkers or signs of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) on imaging tests should also be classified into the intermediate–low-risk category [2]. Thus, ∼30% of patients in this group were classified incorrectly. These 59 patients with low–intermediate risk group, when added to the total number of patients, will make 392, of whom 151 will be troponin positive. Thus, 30-day mortality will be decreased to 5.1% instead of 6% in this group (20 out of 392). However, there will be no significant difference in mortality between low risk and intermediate–high risk (5.1% versus 7%, p=0.16).

In my opinion, another contradiction in the increase in troponin level in 59 of the 196 low-risk patients (increased by 30%). In this study, mortality was one (0.5%) patient in the low-risk group. May be misclassified one patient who did in low risk group if had high troponin level this patient? Mortality rate is 10% in patients with high troponin levels [3], so among 59 patients with positive troponin (which are classified as low risk) 5–6 patients would be expected to die.

Another problem is that of the 59 patients who will be classified as intermediate–high risk in the case of the presence of RVD on echocardiography or computed tomography. As a result, patients with increased levels of troponin alone should be in intermediate risk groups according to the ESC 2014 guidelines.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received July 27, 2016.
  • Accepted August 17, 2016.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2017

References

    1. Becattini C,
    2. Agnelli G,
    3. Lankeit M, et al.
    Acute pulmonary embolism: mortality prediction by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology risk stratification model. Eur Respir J 2016; 48: 780–786.
    1. Konstantinides SV,
    2. Torbicki A,
    3. Agnelli G, et al.
    2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 3033–3069.
    1. Ozsu S,
    2. Ozlu T,
    3. Sentürk A, et al.
    Combination and comparison of two models in prognosis of pulmonary embolism: results from TUrkey Pulmonary Embolism Group (TUPEG) study. Thromb Res 2014; 133: 1006–1010.

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society