Objective: To determine whether the trend of increasing use of rapid methods of mycobacterial testing among participants in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Mycobacteriology E Proficiency Testing Survey noted between 1992 and 1993 continued through 1995, and to collect information concerning mycobacterial staining and culture protocols from laboratories that do limited mycobacterial testing.
Methods: The 1993 CAP E Survey questionnaire addressing mycobacterial laboratory practices, test volumes, and rate of recovery of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis was included with the CAP 1995 E-A Survey. A shortened list of these same questions, excluding those addressing mycobacterial identification and susceptibility test methods, was added to the CAP 1995 E1-A Survey, to which laboratories that do limited mycobacterial testing subscribe.
Results: A total of 802 and 1490 participants in the E and E1 surveys, respectively, returned responses to the CAP by the cutoff date for data analysis. For E Survey participants who answered questions concerning test methods in the years being compared, the percentage who used rapid techniques increased significantly over the study period. More participants used the fluorochrome stain (58% in 1992, 62% in 1993, and 72% in 1995), BACTEC TB plus a solid medium for culture (36% in 1992, 42% in 1993, and 50% in 1995), DNA probes for identification of M tuberculosis (68% in 1993, 79% in 1995), and BACTEC TB for susceptibility testing (65% in 1993, 71% in 1995). The percentages of E1 Survey participants who used a fluorochrome stain for detection of acid-fast bacilli and both a liquid and a solid medium for mycobacterial culture were lower than the percentages of E Survey participants who used these methods. Among participants who responded in all years being compared, the percentage processing respiratory specimens at least 7 times per week increased from 26% in 1992 to 30% in 1993 and 43% in 1995 (P < .001), and the percentages reporting an identification of M tuberculosis within 21 days and susceptibility test results within 28 days increased significantly over the study period (29% in 1992, 40% in 1993, and 56% in 1995 for identification; 13% in 1992, 19% in 1993, and 30% in 1995 for susceptibility testing). Turnaround times for E Survey participants were significantly shorter than those for E1 Survey participants. The number of specimens tested per month appeared to remain relatively stable between 1993 and 1995; however, the number of new patients with tuberculosis and the number of known tuberculosis patients with positive cultures declined significantly.
Conclusions: The recent emphasis placed on utilization of rapid methods of mycobacterial testing appears to have influenced laboratories that subscribe to the CAP E Survey. Significantly more of these laboratories were following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommendations in 1995 than in 1993 and 1992. However, many laboratories that provide only limited mycobacterial testing still have not adopted the more rapid techniques. Because tuberculosis remains a public health problem, the efforts directed at its control must not wane if the recent downward trend in incidence is to be maintained.