The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a relationship between improvement in exercise capacity with supplemental oxygen and the magnitude of hypoxic ventilatory drive in patients with CAO. We hypothesized that those patients with the highest hypoxic drives would be the most likely to have increased exercise tolerance with supplemental oxygen. Seventeen patients with CAO (mean FEV1 = 0.99 +/- 0.45 L) underwent identical maximal cycle ergometry exercise tests on two occasions 45 minutes apart while breathing either air or 30 percent oxygen in a randomized single-blind fashion. With supplemental oxygen, the ventilation decreased and the PaCO2 increased significantly at rest. The patients had a significantly greater exercise tolerance on supplemental oxygen (76.7 vs 69.1 watts, p less than 0.005) but no increase in the maximal ventilation. When the nine patients who improved were compared to the eight patients who did not improve, the two groups were basically identical. Specifically, there were no significant differences in the mean ventilatory or mouth occlusion responses to hypoxia or in the blood gases. The patients who did improve tended to have a greater reduction in their ventilatory response to exercise while exercising on oxygen as compared to when they were exercising on room air. From this study, it was concluded that measurements of hypoxic ventilatory drive are not helpful in predicting which patients with CAO are likely to have improved exercise capability while breathing supplemental oxygen.