Facts and controversies about radiation exposure, part 1: controlling unnecessary radiation exposures

J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Dec;3(12):924-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.07.009.

Abstract

In this 2-part article, the authors address the need to put in perspective the risks of radiation exposure in the rapidly changing field of radiology, considering the current state of knowledge of effects at low levels. The article is based on the content of the refresher course RC 516 presented at the Radiological Society of North America's 2005 annual meeting. After a brief review of epidemiologic studies, part 1 contains a discussion of typical radiation doses experienced in medicine, by both patients and professionals, and it concludes with a description of practical approaches to reduce unnecessary exposures. Part 2 of the article addresses a special concern for the unborn and discusses advisory and regulatory cancer risk estimates based mainly on epidemiologic studies. The limitations of epidemiologic studies at low-level exposures and recent new findings in radiobiology, some of which are summarized, challenge the notion that any amount of radiation causes adverse effects.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Occupational Exposure / prevention & control*
  • Occupational Exposure / statistics & numerical data*
  • Prevalence
  • Radiation Injuries / epidemiology*
  • Radiation Injuries / prevention & control*
  • Radiation Protection / methods*
  • Radiology / organization & administration*
  • Risk Assessment / organization & administration*