Study objectives: Reports on the reproducibility of apnea-hypopnea indexes (AHIs) across sequential polysomnography (PSG) sessions are conflicting, leading to a lack of clear recommendations on the optimal use of this technique: is one night of monitoring sufficient or is a second night required in order to safely reject the diagnosis?
Design: Retrospective comparison of two consecutive nights.
Setting: Sleep unit of a tertiary-care facility.
Patients: Two hundred forty-three subjects with suspected sleep apneas.
Interventions: Two sequential PSG sessions in a sleep unit.
Measurements and results: Using analysis of covariance for repeated measures, with age and body mass index as covariates and gender as a cofactor, a classic first-night effect was found for sleep variables. In addition, a night effect was demonstrated for sleep respiratory variables. Moreover, the high variability of AHIs showed that many patients had their condition diagnosed on only one of the two nights, and more often on the second night than on the first. The gain in detection by adding a second night when the results of testing on the first were negative was between 15% and 25%, according to the AHI obtained on night 1.
Conclusions: Considering the disability associated with sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome, as well as its global cost for society, the present study shows that it is worth performing two consecutive PSG sessions or at least a second one when the result of the first one is negative in all patients admitted for apnea detection.