Chest
Volume 119, Issue 6, June 2001, Pages 1737-1741
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
Tuberculosis
Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Pleural Fluid

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.119.6.1737Get rights and content

Objectives

Tuberculosis, a reemergent killer, is threatening to assume serious proportions all over the world, particularly in view of the AIDS pandemic. The detection of mycobacterial DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in clinical samples is a promising approach for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculous infections. The aims of this study were to evaluate PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pleural fluids and to correlate the results with adenosine deaminase activity (ADA) estimation and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) screening.

Methods

The sensitivity and specificity of PCR in detection of mycobacterial DNA in 20 samples of tuberculous pleural effusion were evaluated using 40 samples of nontubercular pleural effusion as controls. The results were correlated with the ADA in all 60 pleural fluids. In addition, AFB detection by Ziehl-Neelsen staining on cytospin smears of all pleural fluids was also compared.

Results

Of the 20 samples of tuberculous pleural effusion, mycobacterium could be detected by AFB staining in 4 samples. Fourteen samples were PCR positive. None of the samples from the control group were AFB or PCR positive. The sensitivity of PCR, therefore, was 70.0% with specificity of 100% (positive predictive value, 100%; negative predictive value, 86.95%). The sensitivity of AFB screening was at best 20%. The mean of ADA values in tubercular pleural effusions was 63.21 U/L (SD, 33.01), and the mean in the control samples was 51.1 U/L (SD, 29.71). Taking a cut-off value of 50 U/L, both the sensitivity and specificity of ADA estimation in diagnosing tuberculosis were only 55%.

Conclusion

PCR represents a rapid and sensitive method for the detection of mycobacterial DNA in tuberculous pleural effusions. AFB screening has low sensitivity, and ADA estimation has both low sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, when the clinical suspicion is high and smear result is negative, but the signs and symptoms of M tuberculosis are apparent, PCR is the method of choice for identifying the infection.

Section snippets

Patients and Pleural Fluid

The population under study comprised 60 patients with pleural effusion. The study period was from July 1997 to December 1998. Any patient coming to the outpatient department within the study period with pleural effusion and with no other specific clinical history for disease, such as lung cancer, and who had not received any antituberculous treatment (ATT) was included in the study. Pleural fluid was aspirated from these patients and transported to the laboratory for investigation.

Study Design

The study was

Results

Sixty samples of pleural effusion were obtained for this study from the outpatient unit of the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. Twenty samples were tubercular pleural effusion, and 40 samples were nontubercular pleural effusion. The latter were obtained as a disease control group. The ages of the patients with tubercular pleurisy (study group) ranged from 6 to 70 years and included 9 female (45%) and 11 male patients

Discussion

Traditional methods of diagnosing tuberculosis have been isolation of bacilli in culture or recognition of AFB in clinical specimens. AFB staining lacks sensitivity. So far, the “gold standard” has been culture. But with a dividing time of 48 h, it takes up to 10 weeks using the culture method. Besides, microscopy-positive specimens fail to yield mycobacterium on culture, perhaps due to harsh chemical treatment used in decontamination or the presence of nonviable mycobacterium in partially

References (22)

  • DV Cousins et al.

    Use of polymerase chain reaction for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1992)
  • Cited by (95)

    • Development of a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay of CFP-10 for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion

      2015, Tuberculosis
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are several kinds of methods to diagnose tuberculous pleural effusion. Several reports showed that nucleic acid amplification (PCR) was used to detect M. tuberculosis in pleural effusion specimens, with highly variable sensitivities (11%–81%) [9–13]. Thus, the clinical utility of PCR testing seemed highly limited for specimens such as pleural effusion, in which the bacillary load was very low [14].

    • Acute Pneumonia

      2014, Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text