Endoscopy 2010; 42(3): 213-217
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243890
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis

M.  B. von  Bartheld1 , M.  Veseliç-Charvat2 , K.  F.  Rabe1 , J.  T.  Annema1
  • 1Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • 2Division of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 18 August 2009

accepted after revision 26 October 2009

Publication Date:
01 March 2010 (online)

Background and study aims: Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of mediastinal lymph nodes is increasingly used to detect noncaseating granulomas in patients with suspected sarcoidosis. The optimal needle size and tissue processing method for detecting noncaseating granulomas are debated. We assessed the value of cell-block analysis when added to conventional cytological evaluation of EUS aspirates obtained by 22-gauge needles in patients with stage I and II sarcoidosis.

Patients and methods: Data from 101 consecutive patients (55 % of whom had previously had a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy) with suspected pulmonary sarcoidosis (stage I and II), who underwent EUS-FNA of mediastinal lymph nodes with 22-gauge needles were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: The sensitivity of EUS in detecting granulomas was 87 % (cytology and cell-block analysis together) (stage I, 92 %; stage II, 77 %). In 33 % of cytology negative patients (n = 6), granulomas were present in the cell block. The optimal yield for granuloma detection was reached with four needle passes. One patient developed mediastinitis after EUS-FNA.

Conclusions: Cell-block analysis added to conventional cytological evaluation of 22-gauge EUS aspirates, results in a high yield in detecting granulomas in patients with suspected sarcoidosis and reduces the false-negative rate substantially. EUS has a considerably higher yield in stage I compared with stage II sarcoidosis. For an optimal yield, four needle passes are required.

References

  • 1 Baughman R P, Teirstein A S, Judson M A. et al . Clinical characteristics of patients in a case control study of sarcoidosis.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;  164 1885-1889
  • 2 Miller B H, Rosado-de-Christenson M L, McAdams H P, Fishback N F. Thoracic sarcoidosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation.  Radiographics. 1995;  15 421-437
  • 3 Costabel U, Hunninghake G W. ATS/ERS/WASOG statement on sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Statement Committee. American Thoracic Society. European Respiratory Society. World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders.  Eur Respir J. 1999;  14 735-737
  • 4 Iannuzzi M C, Rybicki B A, Teirstein A S. Sarcoidosis.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  357 2153-2165
  • 5 Morales C F, Patefield A J, Strollo Jr P J, Schenk D A. Flexible transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.  Chest. 1994;  106 709-711
  • 6 Trisolini R, Lazzari A L, Cancellieri A. et al . Transbronchial needle aspiration improves the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy in sarcoidosis.  Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2004;  21 147-151
  • 7 Pue C A, Pacht E R. Complications of fiberoptic bronchoscopy at a university hospital.  Chest. 1995;  107 430-432
  • 8 Annema J T, Veselic M, Rabe K F. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.  Eur Respir J. 2005;  25 405-409
  • 9 Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram P V, Topalidis T. et al . Diagnosing sarcoidosis using endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration.  Chest. 2000;  118 928-935
  • 10 Michael H, Ho S, Pollack B. et al . Diagnosis of intra-abdominal and mediastinal sarcoidosis with EUS-guided FNA.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 28-34
  • 11 Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi S. et al . The yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for histological diagnosis in patients suspected of stage I sarcoidosis.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 400-405
  • 12 Wildi S M, Judson M A, Fraig M. et al . Is endosonography guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for sarcoidosis as good as we think?.  Thorax. 2004;  59 794-799
  • 13 Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Omar S. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for lymphadenopathy of unknown origin.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 919-924
  • 14 Garwood S, Judson M A, Silvestri G. et al . Endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis.  Chest. 2007;  132 1298-1304
  • 15 Tremblay A, Stather D R, MacEachern P. et al . A randomized controlled trial of standard vs endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in patients with suspected sarcoidosis.  Chest. 2009;  136 340-346
  • 16 Wong M, Yasufuku K, Nakajima T. et al . Endobronchial ultrasound: new insight for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.  Eur Respir J. 2007;  29 1182-1186
  • 17 Fernandez-Villar A, Botana M I, Leiro V. et al . Clinical utility of transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis in stages I and II.  Arch Bronconeumol. 2007;  43 495-500
  • 18 Pauli G, Pelletier A, Bohner C. et al . Transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.  Chest. 1984;  85 482-484
  • 19 Costabel U. CD4/CD8 ratios in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: of value for diagnosing sarcoidosis?.  Eur Respir J. 1997;  10 2699-2700
  • 20 Kantrow S P, Meyer K C, Kidd P, Raghu G. The CD4/CD8 ratio in BAL fluid is highly variable in sarcoidosis.  Eur Respir J. 1997;  10 2716-2721
  • 21 Nagai S, Izumi T. Bronchoalveolar lavage. Still useful in diagnosing sarcoidosis?.  Clin Chest Med. 1997;  18 787-797
  • 22 Ziegenhagen M W, Rothe M E, Schlaak M, Muller-Quernheim J. Bronchoalveolar and serological parameters reflecting the severity of sarcoidosis.  Eur Respir J. 2003;  21 407-413

J. T. AnnemaMD, PhD 

Department of Pulmonology C3 P

Albinusdreef 2, PO Box 9600
2300 RC Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, The Netherlands

Fax: +31-71-5266927

Email: j.t.annema@lumc.nl

    >