Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Barriers to communication about end-of-life care in AIDS patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Patients and physicians do not adequately discuss patients’ preferences for medical care at the end of life. Our objective was to perform a qualitative study using focus groups to identify barriers and facilitators to communication about end-of-life medical care for patients with AIDS and their physicians.

Participants

Patients with AIDS and physicians with moderate or extensive HIV experience were recruited from clinics and community-based settings using network sampling. A total of 47 patients participated in six focus groups and 19 physicians participated in three groups.

Measurements and main results

Patients or physicians identified 29 barriers and facilitators to communication about end-of-life care. Many patients and physicians expressed discomfort talking about death and dying, and some felt that discussing end-of-life care could cause harm or even hasten death. Several patients expressed the view that a living will obviated the need for discussion with their physician. Previous experience of discrimination from the health care system was a strong barrier to end-of-life communication for some patients with AIDS. Some patients hesitate to bring up end-of-life issues because they want to protect their physicians from uncomfortable discussions. Many patients identified the quality of communication as an important facilitator to these difficult discussions.

Conclusions

Improving the quality of patient-physician communication about end-of-life care will require that physicians identify and overcome the barriers to this communication. To improve the quality of medical care at the end of life, we must address the quality of communication about end-of-life care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCue JD. The naturalness of dying. JAMA.1995;273:1039–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA, Cain KC. Physicians’ and spouses’ predictions of elderly patients’ resuscitation preferences. J Gerontol. 1988;43:M115–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reilly BM, Magnussen R, Ross R, Ash J, Papa L, Wegner M. Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital: attending physicians’ attitudes, their inpatients’ wishes, and reported experience. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:2999–3008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Teno J, Fleishman J, Borck DW, Mor V. The use of formal prior directives among patients with HIV-related diseases. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:490–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1996;274:1591–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sontag S. AIDS and Its Metaphors. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wachter RM, Luce JM, Hearst N, Lo B. Decisions about resuscitation: inequities among patients with different diseases but similar prognoses. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:525–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Update: mortality attributable to HIV infection among persons aged 25–44—United States, 1991 and 1992. MMWR. 1993;42:869–72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jonsen A, Stryker J. The Social Impact of AIDS. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curtis JR, Park DR, Krone MR, Pearlman RA. Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. JAMA. 1995;273:124–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tulsky J, Cassileth B, Bennett C. The effect of ethnicity on ICU use and DNR orders in hospitalized AIDS patients. J Clin Ethics. 1997;8:150–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haas JS, Weissman JS, Cleary PD, et al. Discussion of preferences for life-sustaining care by persons with AIDS. Arch Intern Med. 1991;153:1241–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinbrook R, Lo B, Moulton J, Saika G, Hollander H, Volberding PA. Preferences of homosexual men with AIDS for life-sustaining treatment. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:457–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Foley K. Competent care for the dying instead of physician-assisted suicide. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:54–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lo B. Improving care near the end of life: why is it so hard? JAMA. 1995;274:1634–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Revision of the CDC surveillance case definition for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. MMWR. 1987;36:1–15S.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lincoln YS, Guba EB. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage; 1985:235.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hanson LC, Tulsky JA, Danis M. Can clinical interventions change care at the end of life? Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:381–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneiderman LJ, Kronick R, Kaplan RM, Anderson JP, Langer RD. Effects of offering advance directives on medical treatment and costs. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:599–606.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Danis M, Southerland LI, Garrett JM, et al. A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:882–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pfeifer MP, Sidorov JE, Smith AC, et al. The discussion of end-of-life medical care by primary care patients and physicians: a multi-center study using qualitative interviews. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:82–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrison RS, Morisson EW, Glickman DF. Physician reluctance to discuss advance directives: an empiric investigation of potential barriers. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:2311–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carrese JA, Rhodes LA. Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation: benefit or harm? JAMA. 1995;274:826–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schade SG, Muslin H. Do not resuscitate decisions: discussions with patients. J Med Ethics. 1989;15:186–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tulsky JA, Chesney MA, Lo B. How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:436–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tulsky JA, Chesney MA, Lo B. See one, do one, teach one? House staff experience discussing do-not-resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1285–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McKinley ED, Garrett JM, Evans AT, Danis M. Differences in end-of-life decision making among black and white ambulatory cancer patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:651–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Garrett J, Harris R, Norburn J, Patrick D. Life-sustaining treatments during terminal illness: who wants what? J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:361–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by The Picker/Commonwealth Scholars Program, which provided salary support for Dr. Curtis, and by the University of Washington Royalty Research Fund.

The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding agencies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curtis, J.R., Patrick, D.L. Barriers to communication about end-of-life care in AIDS patients. J GEN INTERN MED 12, 736–741 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07158.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07158.x

Key Words

Navigation