The Surgical Approach to Multifocal Renal Cancers: Hereditary Syndromes, Ipsilateral Multifocality, and Bilateral Tumors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2012.01.006Get rights and content

Section snippets

Definitions of multifocality and bilaterality

Sporadic, unilateral renal tumors account for most patients with kidney cancer; however, patients with multiple renal masses are not uncommon, and clinicians who specialize in RCC will eventually be faced with the management of these patients.3 Multifocality in kidney cancer refers to having more than one renal tumor, which can further be divided into whether the additional tumors are ipsilateral or bilateral. Bilateral tumors refer to lesions on both kidneys and they can present in a

Description of hereditary renal syndrome phenotypes

Hereditary kidney cancer is believed to represent 1% to 4% of RCC cases. Of these patients, some may fit into well-characterized hereditary kidney cancer syndromes, whereas many more patients with RCC may have a genetic component that is not fully recognized or understood. Because of our current poor understanding of genetics and cancer susceptibility genes, the 1% to 4% estimate may be a gross underestimation. A generational study from Iceland (dating back 11 centuries) has aggregated nearly

Principles and goals of surgical management

For patients with sporadic, solitary renal tumors, the goal of therapy is cancer cure while maximizing renal function. With sporadic patients, a single surgery is likely to be sufficient, with surveillance most commonly aimed at identification of cancer dissemination. In the sporadic population, RCC usually presents in patients in their 60s, and although not ideal, a radiographically normal-appearing contralateral kidney gives the clinician the option of sacrificing an affected kidney in the

Workup and management

Patients presenting with bilateral, multifocal, and possibly hereditary renal tumors present management dilemmas. Decisions on timing of genetic testing, role of biopsy, likelihood of pathologic concordance, order of surgery, sequence of tumor removal, optimal methods of nephron preservation, and surveillance for de novo lesions are unique to this patient population. Management of these patients is largely based on more than 20 years of NCI experience with excellent oncologic outcomes. We

Technical considerations

An operation on patients with bilateral, multifocal, and hereditary kidney cancer has unique technical aspects that differ from that of sporadic renal masses. The likelihood of requiring repeat renal surgeries is high and therefore the surgeon must be cognizant of maximizing renal function while minimizing unnecessary steps that could hinder future surgical approaches. Such steps may limit unnecessary morbidity of future operations that are often fraught with complications. Although none of

Special follow-up concerns: recurrence versus de novo tumor development

In patients with sporadic renal tumors, a major goal of follow-up is aimed at early identification of distant disease. Although this is also true with those with bilateral, multifocal, and hereditary syndromes, the likelihood of new tumor development is much higher. Understanding the definition of recurrence and how to manage tumors when they occur is critical for any clinician taking care of this patient population.

Summary

Although the management of sporadic renal tumors is challenging enough, dealing with those with bilateral, multifocal, and hereditary kidney cancer adds an additional level of complexity. A clinician managing this patient population must understand the hereditary syndromes and the genetic testing available. If affected with a germline mutation, other family members should be offered screening and surveillance if they are found to be carriers of a germline mutation. In patients without an

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (114)

  • R.R. Lonser et al.

    von Hippel-Lindau disease

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • J.S. Roth et al.

    Bilateral renal cell carcinoma in the Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1993)
  • L.S. Schmidt et al.

    Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, a genodermatosis associated with spontaneous pneumothorax and kidney neoplasia, maps to chromosome 17p11.2

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2001)
  • M.L. Nickerson et al.

    Mutations in a novel gene lead to kidney tumors, lung wall defects, and benign tumors of the hair follicle in patients with the Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome

    Cancer Cell

    (2002)
  • L.S. Schmidt et al.

    Germline BHD-mutation spectrum and phenotype analysis of a large cohort of families with Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2005)
  • C.P. Pavlovich et al.

    Evaluation and management of renal tumors in the Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome

    J Urol

    (2005)
  • N.A. Alam et al.

    Localization of a gene (MCUL1) for multiple cutaneous leiomyomata and uterine fibroids to chromosome 1q42.3-q43

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2001)
  • M. Kiuru et al.

    Familial cutaneous leiomyomatosis is a two-hit condition associated with renal cell cancer of characteristic histopathology

    Am J Pathol

    (2001)
  • B. Zbar et al.

    Hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma

    J Urol

    (1994)
  • D. Astuti et al.

    Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2001)
  • K. Duffy et al.

    Mutational analysis of the von Hippel Lindau gene in clear cell renal carcinomas from tuberous sclerosis complex patients

    Mod Pathol

    (2002)
  • C.B. Dechet et al.

    Renal oncocytoma: multifocality, bilateralism, metachronous tumor development and coexistent renal cell carcinoma

    J Urol

    (1999)
  • R.S. Boris et al.

    The impact of germline BHD mutation on histological concordance and clinical treatment of patients with bilateral renal masses and known unilateral oncocytoma

    J Urol

    (2011)
  • A.R. Patel et al.

    Bilateral synchronous sporadic renal tumors: pathologic concordance and clinical implications

    Urology

    (2011)
  • A. Adamy et al.

    Renal oncocytosis: management and clinical outcomes

    J Urol

    (2011)
  • G. Weirich et al.

    Familial renal oncocytoma: clinicopathological study of 5 families

    J Urol

    (1998)
  • R.Y. Calne

    Treatment of bilateral hypernephromas by nephrectomy, excision of tumour, and autotransplantation. Report of three cases

    Lancet

    (1973)
  • C.D. Fetner et al.

    Bilateral renal cell carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome: treatment with staged bilateral nephrectomy and hemodialysis

    J Urol

    (1977)
  • E.M. Mullin et al.

    Bilateral renal carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease

    Urology

    (1976)
  • K.P. Stiles et al.

    Renal cell carcinoma as a cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States: patient characteristics and survival

    Kidney Int

    (2003)
  • T.V. Ajithkumar et al.

    Management of solid tumours in organ-transplant recipients

    Lancet Oncol

    (2007)
  • A.T. Fadahunsi et al.

    Feasibility and outcomes of partial nephrectomy for resection of at least 20 tumors in a single renal unit

    J Urol

    (2011)
  • B.G. Duffey et al.

    The relationship between renal tumor size and metastases in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease

    J Urol

    (2004)
  • M.M. Walther et al.

    Renal cancer in families with hereditary renal cancer: prospective analysis of a tumor size threshold for renal parenchymal sparing surgery

    J Urol

    (1999)
  • S.E. Sutherland et al.

    Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter?

    J Urol

    (2002)
  • M. Carini et al.

    Simple enucleation for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm in greatest dimension: progression and long-term survival

    J Urol

    (2006)
  • A. Minervini et al.

    Simple enucleation is equivalent to traditional partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: results of a nonrandomized, retrospective, comparative study

    J Urol

    (2011)
  • R. Boris et al.

    Initial experience with robot assisted partial nephrectomy for multiple renal masses

    J Urol

    (2009)
  • A.P. Steinberg et al.

    Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for two or more ipsilateral renal tumors

    Urology

    (2004)
  • G. Bratslavsky et al.

    Salvage partial nephrectomy for hereditary renal cancer: feasibility and outcomes

    J Urol

    (2008)
  • A. Johnson et al.

    Feasibility and outcomes of repeat partial nephrectomy

    J Urol

    (2008)
  • A. Sporer et al.

    Study of renal blood supply and its implication in renal pelvic surgery

    Urology

    (1981)
  • M.M. Walther et al.

    Evaluation of color Doppler intraoperative ultrasound in parenchymal sparing renal surgery

    J Urol

    (1994)
  • P.L. Choyke et al.

    Intraoperative ultrasound during renal parenchymal sparing surgery for hereditary renal cancers: a 10-year experience

    J Urol

    (2001)
  • R.H. Thompson et al.

    Comparison of warm ischemia versus no ischemia during partial nephrectomy on a solitary kidney

    Eur Urol

    (2010)
  • R.H. Thompson et al.

    Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy

    Eur Urol

    (2010)
  • B.R. Lane et al.

    Comparison of cold and warm ischemia during partial nephrectomy in 660 solitary kidneys reveals predominant role of nonmodifiable factors in determining ultimate renal function

    J Urol

    (2011)
  • R.H. Thompson et al.

    The impact of ischemia time during open nephron sparing surgery on solitary kidneys: a multi-institutional study

    J Urol

    (2007)
  • G. Bratslavsky et al.

    Long-term management of bilateral, multifocal, recurrent renal carcinoma

    Nat Rev Urol

    (2010)
  • T. Klatte et al.

    Clinicopathological features and prognosis of synchronous bilateral renal cell carcinoma: an international multicentre experience

    BJU Int

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text