Elsevier

Infection, Genetics and Evolution

Volume 21, January 2014, Pages 583-592
Infection, Genetics and Evolution

Staphylococcus aureus toxins – Their functions and genetics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2013.03.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • S. aureus is a frequent cause of infection and a common human commensal.

  • The S. aureus pan-genome encodes numerous toxins.

  • The endowment of clinical S. aureus isolates with toxin genes is highly variable.

  • Toxin gene distribution is not random but coupled to the genetic background.

  • This has important implications for epidemiological studies of pathogenesis.

Abstract

The outcome of encounters between Staphylococcus (S.) aureus and its human host ranges from life-threatening infection through allergic reactions to symptom-free colonization. The pan-genome of this bacterial species encodes numerous toxins, known or strongly suspected to cause specific diseases or symptoms. Three toxin families are in the focus of this review, namely (i) pore-forming toxins, (ii) exfoliative toxins and (iii) superantigens. The majority of toxin-encoding genes are located on mobile genetic elements (MGEs), resulting in a pronounced heterogeneity in the endowment with toxin genes of individual S. aureus strains. Recent population genomic analysis have provided a framework for an improved understanding of the temporal and spatial scales of the motility of MGEs and their associated toxin genes. The distribution of toxin genes among clonal lineages within the species S. aureus is not random, and phylogenetic (sub-)lineages within clonal complexes feature characteristic toxin signatures. When studying pathogenesis, this lineage association, which is caused by the clonal nature of S. aureus makes it difficult to discriminate effects of specific toxins from contributions of the genetic background and/or other associated genetic factors.

Introduction

Staphylococcus (S.) aureus is notorious as the most common causative agent of hospital-acquired infections, and the spread of antibiotic resistant strains, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), in hospitals challenges health care systems worldwide. Moreover, S. aureus strains of increased virulence, known as community-aquired MRSA (CA-MRSA), can threaten even healthy individuals in the community (Chambers and DeLeo, 2009, David and Daum, 2010, DeLeo et al., 2010). In addition, S. aureus is currently being discussed as the trigger and/or enhancer of allergies of the respiratory system and the skin (Bachert and Zhang, 2012, Gould et al., 2007). Nevertheless up to now, no anti-S. aureus vaccine has been approved for medical practice (Schaffer and Lee, 2008, Spellberg and Daum, 2012). In spite of the above, the most frequent encounter of S. aureus with its human host is peaceful colonization, and around 20% of adults are persistent carriers of the micro-organisms, while another 60% are intermittently colonized (van Belkum et al., 2009, Wertheim et al., 2005). What makes the species S. aureus so immensely successful?

A salient feature of S. aureus is its variability. By indexing nucleotide sequence diversity at seven universally present genetic loci, multilocus-sequence typing (MLST) to date has revealed about 2,400 ‘sequence types’ (ST) for S. aureus (see <www.mlst.net>). The vast majority of these diverse STs, however, are clustered in a remarkably limited number of clonal complexes (CC) or lineages, each of which appears to be distributed worldwide (reviewed in (Nübel et al., 2011)). The predominant S. aureus lineages are CC1, 5, 8, 15, 22, 30, 45, 59, 80, 97 and 121 (Nübel et al., 2011).

About 75% of the S. aureus genes are shared by more than 95% of strains and hence may be considered the ‘core genome’ of the species. In addition, two kinds of variably present genes can be distinguished: (i) the core variable genes (∼10% of genes), which are largely conserved within each of the S. aureus clonal complexes and constitute their respective “make up”, and (ii) mobile genetic elements (MGEs, ∼15% of genes). The core variable genome includes most surface-associated genes (microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, MSCRAMMs) and regulator genes. Core variable genes are encoded on the bacterial chromosome and are, therefore, typically stable and transferred vertically (Lindsay et al., 2006). MGEs include bacteriophages, plasmids, S. aureus pathogenicity islands (SaPI), transposons, and staphylococcal chromosomal cassettes (SCC) (Feil et al., 2003, Lindsay, 2010, Lindsay and Holden, 2006, Lindsay et al., 2006). They mainly encode resistance (e.g. methicillin resistance genes) and virulence genes (e.g., Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes, superantigen (SAg) genes). MGEs can be distributed either by vertical transmission to daughter cells or by horizontal transfer (Lindsay and Holden, 2006).

The full complement of all genes (also known as the pan-genome) of S. aureus encodes a wide array of secreted or cell-surface-associated virulence factors (Foster, 2005). These include proteins that

  • (1)

    mediate adherence to damaged tissue, extra-cellular matrix and the surface of host cells (Foster and Hook, 1998),

  • (2)

    facilitate tissue destruction and spreading,

  • (3)

    promote iron uptake (Skaar and Schneewind, 2004),

  • (4)

    bind to proteins in the bodily fluids to help evade antibody- and complement-mediated immune responses, including the action of phagocytes,

  • (5)

    lyse host cells and

  • (6)

    manipulate the innate and adaptive immune responses.

However, a clear association between virulence genes and disease symptoms has been established or is strongly suspected only for some potent S. aureus toxins causing, for example, toxic shock syndrome (TSS), staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS), necrotizing pneumonia, or deep-seated skin infections (Dinges et al., 2000, Holtfreter and Bröker, 2005, Jarraud et al., 1999, Jarraud et al., 2002, Ladhani, 2003). This review focuses on such toxins, including pore-forming toxins, like PVL and hemolysin-α (Hla, α-toxin,), exfoliative toxins (ET) and the SAgs. They damage the membranes of host cells, degrade inter-cellular junctions, or modulate the immune response by aberrant activation of immune cells. Only a few S. aureus toxins, such as Hla and the phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs), are core genome-encoded, while most of the other toxin genes are localized on MGEs (Table 1). Hence, the species S. aureus is characterized by extraordinary heterogeneity regarding the toxin gene equipment of individual clinical isolates.

Section snippets

Pore-forming toxins

S. aureus can produce several toxins that damage the membranes of host cells, which can ultimately lead to cell lysis. At sublytic concentrations, these pore-forming toxins are potent cell stressors. In synergy with other danger signals such as lipoproteins that activate the toll-like receptor 2 the toxins trigger the NALP3-inflammasome response resulting in release of cytokines IL1, IL18 and IL33 (Franchi et al., 2012). Hla, hemolysin-γ (Hlg) and PVL have been shown to exert strong

Exfoliative toxins (ETs)

The three known S. aureus exfoliative toxins ETA, ETB and ETD are encoded on different genetic elements (Table 1): eta is localized in the genome on a temperate phage, whereas etb is found on plasmids and etd on a genomic island. The prevalence of eta and/or etb ranges from 0.5 to 3% in MSSA (Becker et al., 2003, Nhan et al., 2011, Sila et al., 2009), whereas around 10% of MRSA are eta positive (Sila et al., 2009). Holtfreter et al. observed a strong association of etd with invasive CC25

Superantigens (SAgs)

The staphylococcal SAgs belong to the most potent T-cell mitogens known. Some of these toxins stimulate human T-cells at femtomolar concentrations. Originally, the SAgs of S. aureus were termed staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) because they elicit vomiting and diarrhea after oral uptake, the hallmarks of S. aureus food poisoning. This feature is different from their superantigenicity, however, because some of the recently identified SAgs apparently lack emetic properties. Therefore, the

Outlook: toxins as vaccination targets

Toxins are interesting vaccine candidates because (i) they are dangerous and significantly contribute to pathogenesis and (ii) their toxic functions can be neutralized by specific antibodies. In fact, antibody-mediated protection from the effects of S. aureus toxins has been convincingly demonstrated in humans and in animal models (Cheung and Otto, 2012, Daum and Spellberg, 2012, Holtfreter et al., 2010, Spellberg and Daum, 2012). However, the extra-ordinary variability of toxins in the

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge our research teams and the many scientists whose work we describe in this review, and regret that many interesting contributions could not be included because of space constraints. We are grateful to Kate Splieth for eliminating language errors and typos from the manuscript. We thank Jodi Lindsay for helpful comments on MGE nomenclature. Our work has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR34, GRK840), the Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie

References (168)

  • B.A. Diep et al.

    Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    The Lancet

    (2006)
  • T.J. Foster et al.

    Surface protein adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus

    Trends Microbiol.

    (1998)
  • J. Fraser et al.

    Superantigens – powerful modifiers of the immune system

    Mol. Med. Today

    (2000)
  • J.M. Fueyo et al.

    Relationships between toxin gene content and genetic background in nasal carried isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from Asturias, Spain

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.

    (2005)
  • Y. Gillet et al.

    Association between Staphylococcus aureus strains carrying gene for Panton-Valentine leukocidin and highly lethal necrotising pneumonia in young immunocompetent patients

    Lancet

    (2002)
  • S. Holtfreter et al.

    Towards the immune proteome of Staphylococcus aureus - The anti-S. aureus antibody response

    Int J Med Microbiol

    (2010)
  • N. Inoshima et al.

    Genetic requirement for ADAM10 in severe Staphylococcus aureus skin infection

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2012)
  • H.S. Joo et al.

    Antimicrobial activity of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is caused by phenol-soluble modulin derivatives

    J Biol Chem

    (2011)
  • J. Kaneko et al.

    Complete nucleotide sequence and molecular characterization of the temperate staphylococcal bacteriophage phiPVL carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes

    Gene

    (1998)
  • D. Kretschmer et al.

    Human formyl peptide receptor 2 senses highly pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus

    Cell Host Microbe

    (2010)
  • M. Kuroda et al.

    Whole genome sequencing of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • K. Kusch et al.

    The influence of SaeRS and sigma(B) on the expression of superantigens in different Staphylococcus aureus isolates

    Int J Med Microbiol

    (2011)
  • S. Ladhani

    Understanding the mechanism of action of the exfoliative toxins of Staphylococcus aureus

    FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol

    (2003)
  • J.A. Lindsay

    Genomic variation and evolution of Staphylococcus aureus

    Int J Med Microbiol

    (2010)
  • S. Monecke et al.

    Comparative genomics and DNA array-based genotyping of pandemic Staphylococcus aureus strains encoding Panton-Valentine leukocidin

    Clin Microbiol Infect

    (2007)
  • S. Monecke et al.

    High diversity of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive, methicillin-susceptible isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and implications for the evolution of community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus

    Clin Microbiol Infect

    (2007)
  • M.R. Alderson et al.

    Fas ligand mediates activation-induced cell death in human T lymphocytes

    J. Exp. Med.

    (1995)
  • F. Alonzo et al.

    Staphylococcus aureus leucocidin ED contributes to systemic infection by targeting neutrophils and promoting bacterial growth in vivo

    Mol. Microbiol.

    (2012)
  • F. Alonzo et al.

    CCR5 is a receptor for Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin ED

    Nature

    (2013)
  • D.O. Andrey et al.

    Control of the Staphylococcus aureus toxic shock tst promoter by the global regulator SarA

    J Bacteriol

    (2010)
  • C. Bachert et al.

    Chronic rhinosinusitis and asthma: novel understanding of the role of IgE ‘above atopy’

    J. Intern. Med.

    (2012)
  • C. Bachert et al.

    Role of staphylococcal superantigens in upper airway disease

    Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

    (2008)
  • C. Bachert et al.

    Presence of IL-5 protein and IgE antibodies to staphylococcal enterotoxins in nasal polyps is associated with comorbid asthma

    J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

    (2010)
  • P.J. Barnes

    Intrinsic asthma: not so different from allergic asthma but driven by superantigens?

    Clin. Exp. Allergy

    (2009)
  • K.W. Bayles et al.

    Genetic and molecular analyses of the gene encoding staphylococcal enterotoxin D

    J. Bacteriol.

    (1989)
  • K. Becker et al.

    Prevalence of genes encoding pyrogenic toxin superantigens and exfoliative toxins among strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from blood and nasal specimens

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2003)
  • K. Becker et al.

    Systematic survey on the prevalence of genes coding for staphylococcal enterotoxins SElM, SElO, and SElN

    Mol. Nutr. Food Res.

    (2004)
  • S. Bhakdi et al.

    Alpha-toxin of Staphylococcus aureus

    Microbiol. Rev.

    (1991)
  • C. Blank et al.

    Superantigen and endotoxin synergize in the induction of lethal shock

    Eur. J. Immunol.

    (1997)
  • J. Bubeck Wardenburg et al.

    Vaccine protection against Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia

    J. Exp. Med.

    (2008)
  • J. Bubeck Wardenburg et al.

    Poring over pores: alpha-hemolysin and Panton-Valentine leukocidin in Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia

    Nat. Med.

    (2007)
  • J. Bubeck Wardenburg et al.

    Surface proteins and exotoxins are required for the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia

    Infect. Immun.

    (2007)
  • J. Bubeck Wardenburg et al.

    Panton-Valentine leukocidin is not a virulence determinant in murine models of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (2008)
  • N. Carpaij et al.

    Genetic variation in spatio-temporal confined USA300 community-associated MRSA isolates: a shift from clonal dispersion to genetic evolution?

    PLoS ONE

    (2011)
  • S. Castillo-Ramirez et al.

    Phylogeographic variation in recombination rates within a global clone of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

    Genome Biol.

    (2012)
  • H.F. Chambers et al.

    Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era

    Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

    (2009)
  • S.S. Chatterjee et al.

    Distribution and regulation of the mobile genetic element-encoded phenol-soluble modulin PSM-mec in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    PLoS ONE

    (2011)
  • G.Y. Cheung et al.

    The potential use of toxin antibodies as a strategy for controlling acute Staphylococcus aureus infections

    Expert Opin. Ther. Targets

    (2012)
  • G.Y. Cheung et al.

    Staphylococcus epidermidis strategies to avoid killing by human neutrophils

    PLoS Pathog.

    (2010)
  • Y. Choi et al.

    Selective expansion of T cells expressing V beta 2 in toxic shock syndrome

    J. Exp. Med.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (162)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text