Elsevier

Journal of Infection

Volume 71, Issue 5, November 2015, Pages 501-510
Journal of Infection

Review
Point-of-care testing for respiratory viruses in adults: The current landscape and future potential

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2015.07.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • There is a large burden of respiratory virus infection in hospitalised adults.

  • Replacing empirical antimicrobials with pathogen directed use is a global priority.

  • Molecular platforms now exist with potential for use as point-of-care tests (POCT).

  • Potential benefits of POCT include a reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use.

  • High quality trials evaluating clinically relevant outcomes are urgently needed.

Summary

Respiratory viruses are responsible for a large proportion of acute respiratory illness in adults as well as children, and are associated with a huge socio-economic burden worldwide. Development of accurate point-of-care tests (POCT) for respiratory viruses has been listed as a priority by the World Health Organisation and replacing the current paradigm of empirical antimicrobial use with directed use is a listed goal of the movement for reduction in antimicrobial resistance. POCTs for respiratory viruses have previously been limited by the poor sensitivity of antigen detection based tests and by a limited range of detectable viruses. Highly accurate molecular platforms are now able to test for a comprehensive range of viruses, can be operated by non-laboratory staff and can generate a result in approximately 1 h, making them potentially deployable as POCTs. The potential clinical benefits of POC testing for respiratory viruses in adults include a reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use, improved antiviral prescribing for influenza and rationalisation of isolation facilities. We review here the burden of disease, the currently available molecular platforms with potential for POCT use and the existing evidence for clinical and economic benefits of testing for respiratory viruses in adults.

Introduction

Acute respiratory tract infections are responsible for an estimated 4.25 million deaths each year and are the third most common cause of death worldwide.1 Although bacteria have previously been considered to be the principal aetiological agents of severe respiratory infection, the global importance of respiratory viruses in all age groups has been increasingly recognised in recent years.2, 3, 4 Diagnostic technology for respiratory virus detection has evolved rapidly over the last two decades from viral culture and immunofluorescence to the current standard of molecular detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This review focuses on the currently available molecular diagnostic platforms for respiratory virus detection with potential for use as point-of-care tests (POCT) and explores the current landscape for POCT in adults.

Section snippets

Respiratory viruses: clinical and economic burden of disease

Improvements in the sensitivity of diagnostic testing for respiratory viruses with the widespread use of nucleic amplification techniques such as PCR have helped to accurately define the burden of viral disease over the past two decades. In children respiratory viruses have been detected by molecular diagnostic techniques in 43–67% of cases of community acquired pneumonia (CAP),5 over 90% of infants with bronchiolitis,6 and approximately 85% of asthma exacerbations.7 In adults approximately

Laboratory PCR

Nucleic acid amplification techniques such as PCR have now largely superseded cell culture and direct fluorescent antibody testing as the method of choice for routine diagnostic testing for respiratory viruses, due to their superior diagnostic accuracy and faster turnaround time. PCR is highly sensitive and specific but generally has a turnaround time of at least 24 h and requires specialist laboratory facilities and expertise.54, 55

Rapid antigen detection tests for respiratory viruses

There are several commercially available FDA approved and CE

Alere i Influenza A&B

The Alere i Influenza A&B (Alere, San Diego, CA, USA) is an FDA approved and CE marked isothermal nucleic acid amplification-based system that uses a fluorescence-based molecular signal to detect influenza A and B. Results are generated within 15 min, with around 2 min of “hands on” time. The testing kits and analyser have been specifically designed to be used by non-laboratory clinical staff in an acute care environment and it is the only molecular platform that is FDA approved specifically as

Respiratory virus point-of-care testing in the wider context

The UK Department of Health commissioned report into UK pathology services in 2006 noted the importance of developing clinically relevant point-of-care diagnostic tests to reduce turnaround times and improve patient pathways.78 Despite this POCT for infectious diseases in the UK and globally have not advanced far beyond dipstick testing for urinary tract infection with in vitro diagnostic tests for infection remaining confined to large centralised laboratories. The associated slow turnaround

Reduction in antibiotic use

The current culture of empirical antimicrobial use in patients with suspected infection is no longer considered sustainable due the emergence and proliferation of antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic use in hospitalised patients with acute respiratory illness is near universal despite the predominance of viruses and the low frequency of detectable bacteria in much of this patient group. Fig. 1 shows antibiotic use by detected pathogen in a large study of hospitalised adults from the UK.4

Conclusion

The current global priority of replacing empirical antimicrobial use with pathogen directed therapy to help combat resistance, coupled with the recent development of rapid, accurate and easy-to-use molecular test platforms for respiratory viruses, sets the scene for rolling out a point-of-care testing strategy in patients presenting with acute respiratory illness. The potential benefits of such a strategy include a reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use, improved use of directed antiviral

Author contributions

NJB, HFS and TWC were all involved in the design, literature search and writing the manuscript, including the final version submitted.

Funding source

None.

Conflicts of interest

None declared for all authors.

References (115)

  • E.R. Gaunt et al.

    Disease burden of the most commonly detected respiratory viruses in hospitalized patients calculated using the disability adjusted life year (DALY) model

    J Clin Virol

    (2011)
  • T. Heikkinen et al.

    The common cold

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • A.S. Monto et al.

    Respiratory illness caused by picornavirus infection: a review of clinical outcomes

    Clin Ther

    (2001)
  • I.M. Mackay

    Real-time PCR in the microbiology laboratory

    Clin Microbiol Infect

    (2004)
  • A.E. Casiano-Colón et al.

    Lack of sensitivity of rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults

    J Clin Virol

    (2003)
  • C.K. Lee et al.

    Evaluation of Sofia fluorescent immunoassay analyzer for influenza A/B virus

    J Clin Virol

    (2012)
  • N. Kanwar et al.

    Head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of BD Veritor System RSV and Quidel Sofia RSV FIA systems for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) diagnosis

    J Clin Virol

    (2015)
  • P. Brotons et al.

    Performance of a rapid multi-analyte 2-photon excitation assay in children with acute respiratory infection

    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis

    (2014)
  • L. Ivaska et al.

    Identification of respiratory viruses with a novel point-of-care multianalyte antigen detection test in children with acute respiratory tract infection

    J Clin Virol

    (2013)
  • J. Bell et al.

    Multicenter clinical evaluation of the novel Alere i Influenza A&B isothermal nucleic acid amplification test

    J Clin Virol

    (2014)
  • C. Beckmann et al.

    Diagnostic performance of near-patient testing for influenza

    J Clin Virol

    (2015)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Multiplex viral polymerase chain reaction testing using the FilmArray device compared with direct fluorescent antibody testing

    Lab Med

    (2014)
  • S.A. Butt et al.

    Comparison of three commercial RT-PCR systems for the detection of respiratory viruses

    J Clin Virol

    (2014)
  • S.L. Jenny et al.

    Evaluation of the Xpert Flu A panel nucleic acid amplification-based point-of-care test for influenza A virus detection and pandemic H1 subtyping

    J Clin Virol

    (2010)
  • N. Salez et al.

    Prospective and retrospective evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC assay for rapid detection of influenza A, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus

    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis

    (2015)
  • P. Little et al.

    Amoxicillin for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection in primary care when pneumonia is not suspected: a 12-country, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2013)
  • S.G. Muthuri et al.

    Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in reducing mortality in patients admitted to hospital with influenza A H1N1pdm09 virus infection: a meta-analysis of individual participant data

    Lancet Respir Med

    (2014)
  • A.M. Fry et al.

    Efficacy of oseltamivir treatment started within 5 days of symptom onset to reduce influenza illness duration and virus shedding in an urban setting in Bangladesh: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2014)
  • J. Dobson et al.

    Oseltamivir treatment for influenza in adults: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Lancet

    (2015)
  • H. Kelly et al.

    Influenza: the rational use of oseltamivir

    Lancet

    (2015)
  • J. Haffizulla et al.

    Effect of nitazoxanide in adults and adolescents with acute uncomplicated influenza: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2014)
  • N.W. Schluger

    Acute respiratory infections Atlas

    (2010)
  • S. Jain et al.

    Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children

    N Engl J Med

    (2015)
  • V. D'Acremont et al.

    Beyond malaria – causes of fever in outpatient Tanzanian children

    N Engl J Med

    (2014)
  • J.M. Mansbach et al.

    Prospective multicenter study of viral etiology and hospital length of stay in children with severe bronchiolitis

    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

    (2012)
  • S.L. Johnston et al.

    Community study of role of viral infections in exacerbations of asthma in 9–11 year old children

    BMJ

    (1995)
  • L.C. Jennings et al.

    Incidence and characteristics of viral community-acquired pneumonia in adults

    Thorax

    (2008)
  • N. Johansson et al.

    Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia: increased microbiological yield with new diagnostic methods

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2010)
  • K.E. Templeton et al.

    Improved diagnosis of the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia with real-time polymerase chain reaction

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2005)
  • N.G. Papadopoulos et al.

    Viruses and bacteria in acute asthma exacerbations – a GA2LEN-DARE* systematic review

    Allergy

    (2011)
  • A. Mohan et al.

    Prevalence of viral infection detected by PCR and RT-PCR in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD: a systematic review

    Respirology

    (2010)
  • S.A. Madhi et al.

    A role for Streptococcus pneumoniae in virus-associated pneumonia

    Nat Med

    (2004)
  • S.N. George et al.

    Human rhinovirus infection during naturally occurring COPD exacerbations

    Eur Respir J

    (2014)
  • J.A. McCullers

    The co-pathogenesis of influenza viruses with bacteria in the lung

    Nat Rev Microbiol

    (2014)
  • A.R. Falsey et al.

    Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • C. Warren-Gash et al.

    Circulating influenza virus, climatic factors, and acute myocardial infarction: a time series study in England and Wales and Hong Kong

    J Infect Dis

    (2011)
  • T. Zhu et al.

    Association of influenza vaccination with reduced risk of venous thromboembolism

    Thromb Haemost

    (2009)
  • C.S. Kwok et al.

    Influenza, influenza-like symptoms and their association with cardiovascular risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

    Int J Clin Pract

    (2015 May 4)
  • M. Madjid et al.

    The influence of oseltamivir treatment on the risk of stroke after influenza infection

    Cardiology

    (2009)
  • T. Welte et al.

    Clinical and economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia among adults in Europe

    Thorax

    (2012)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Respiratory syncytial virus and metapneumovirus

      2023, Molecular Medical Microbiology, Third Edition
    • Development of antibody against drug-resistant respiratory syncytial virus: Rapid detection of mutant virus using split superfolder green fluorescent protein-antibody system

      2021, Biosensors and Bioelectronics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Considering that the emergence of palivizumab-resistant strains could pose an unprecedented threat to public health, it is critical to accurately and rapidly diagnose palivizumab-resistant RSV infections so that RSV-infected patients can receive proper treatment. For RSV detection, several types of antigen-sensing and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods have been developed (Son et al., 2015; Mahony et al., 2011; Brendish et al., 2015; Popow-Kraupp et al., 2011). Some of the methods approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are used for the diagnosis of RSV infection.

    • Clinical impact of a routine, molecular, point-of-care, test-and-treat strategy for influenza in adults admitted to hospital (FluPOC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

      2021, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Antiviral treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors is recommended for all patients admitted to hospital with suspected and proven influenza by UK and US national guidelines8,9 and evidence suggests that earlier use is associated with better outcomes.10,11 New rapid molecular point-of-care tests (mPOCTs) using PCR for influenza are highly accurate, easy to use, and can generate a result in less than 1 h,12–15 compared with the current turnaround time of approximately 24 h for laboratory-based PCR testing.7 Routinely testing patients for influenza at the point of care might improve influenza detection and use of antivirals and isolation facilities by allowing confident real-time decision making.7,16–20

    • The application of personal glucose meters as universal point-of-care diagnostic tools

      2020, Biosensors and Bioelectronics
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is estimated that effective portable tests could prevent millions of deaths each year through more effective management of transmissible diseases and life-threatening conditions(Drain et al., 2014; Rasti et al., 2017). In addition to the lives saved, point of care tests have the potential to reduce the transmission and spread of disease (due to rapid diagnosis and immediate intervention), reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics, improve the use of antiviral medications, and reduce the overall economic costs of treating infectious diseases(Brendish et al., 2015; Turner et al., 2017). However, the main barriers for the introduction of new point of care tests are the high cost and the time necessary to bring one to the market.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text