Reviews and feature article
Local allergic rhinitis: Concept, pathophysiology, and management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.032Get rights and content

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is a localized nasal allergic response in the absence of systemic atopy characterized by local production of specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies, a TH2 pattern of mucosal cell infiltration during natural exposure to aeroallergens, and a positive nasal allergen provocation test response with release of inflammatory mediators (tryptase and eosinophil cationic protein). Although the prevalence remains to be established, a number of patients previously given a diagnosis of nonallergic rhinitis or idiopathic rhinitis are now being classified as having LAR. Culprit allergens responsible include house dust mite, grass and olive pollens, and many others. For the diagnosis of LAR, neither skin prick testing nor determination of the presence of serum sIgE antibodies is useful, and a nasal allergen provocation test is needed to identify the culprit allergen or allergens. In a certain proportion of cases, local sIgE can be detected, and conjunctivitis, asthma, or both can be associated. Whether patients with LAR will have systemic atopy in the future is a matter of debate. Further studies are needed for examine the prevalence of this phenomenon in different areas, to improve the diagnostic methods to better identify these patients, and to develop therapeutic approaches, including the use of immunotherapy.

Section snippets

Etiologic classification of rhinitis

From an etiologic point of view, noninfectious rhinitis has been traditionally classified as allergic and nonallergic, and the diagnosis has been based on the clinical history, skin prick test (SPT) responses, and serum sIgE levels to inhalant allergens.14 However, evidence has recently suggested that this approach is incomplete because patients previously given a diagnosis of NAR or idiopathic rhinitis (IR) might actually be classified as having LAR.6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13

AR is the most common

Epidemiologic, clinical, and pathophysiologic aspects of LAR

The identification of a subgroup of patients who could be characterized as having LAR has generated a number of important questions:

  • 1.

    What are the prevalence and overall effect of LAR, and what is the influence of environmental factors on the epidemiology of this condition?

  • 2.

    Are the allergens associated with LAR the same as those involved in conventional AR?

  • 3.

    How definitive is the evidence that IgE is produced locally in the nasal mucosa?

  • 4.

    Is IgE production limited to the nose and why?

  • 5.

    Is LAR a

Nasal symptoms and comorbidities

Patients with LAR often present with symptoms typical of AR (ie, rhinorrhea, obstruction, sneezing, and itching), which are often associated with ocular symptoms, and good response to oral antihistamines and nasal corticosteroids.8, 9, 12 Patients with LAR and systemic AR report anterior rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching as the most frequent symptoms.8, 9 Patients with LAR can be grouped according to the classical (seasonal, perennial, and occupational) and Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on

Diagnostic approach

Several nonallergic conditions can mimic AR symptoms, but because management differs in each case, it is very important to differentiate between AR and NAR. Knowledge of the existence of a localized allergic response in the nasal mucosa demonstrates the need for a thorough allergologic workup. Rondón et al15 have proposed a new diagnostic approach with a nasal allergologic evaluation in all patients with a clinical history suggestive of AR but with negative SPT responses and a lack of sIgE

Therapeutic options

The correct differentiation between LAR and NAR is a key point for the management of this new entity. The management of AR includes the following: allergen avoidance, pharmacologic treatment, immunotherapy, and education.14 Patients with LAR have reported a good response to topical nasal corticosteroids and oral antihistamines.8, 9 This might be one phenotypic characteristic of patients with LAR in contrast with those with nonatopic rhinitis. Double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials

Future research

Increasing evidence of a localized allergic response in nonatopic patients raises important questions about LAR, many of them outlined in this article: studies of prevalence and incidence in adults and children, influence of the allergenic load in the production of disease, lower airway and conjunctival involvement, effectiveness of pharmacologic treatment, and specific immunotherapy.

Concerning natural history, it is relevant to know whether these patients remain stable over long periods of

References (26)

  • A.S. Carney et al.

    Atypical nasal challenges in patients with idiopathic rhinitis: more evidence for the existence of allergy in the absence of atopy?

    Clin Exp Allergy

    (2002)
  • D.G. Powe et al.

    ‘Entopy’: localized mucosal allergic disease in the absence of systemic responses for atopy

    Clin Exp Allergy

    (2003)
  • C. Rondón et al.

    Seasonal idiopathic rhinitis with local inflammatory response and specific IgE in absence of systemic response

    Allergy

    (2008)
  • Cited by (219)

    • Cystatin SN in type 2 inflammatory airway diseases

      2023, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
    • Local allergic rhinitis – a narrative review

      2024, European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: W. J. Fokkens has received research support from GlaxoSmithKline and Medtronic and has served as an advisor to GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, and Stallergenes. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

    View full text