Original articleClinical implications of Hoover's sign in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Introduction
The measure of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is recommended to assess and monitor patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [1]. It has been clearly established that a low FEV1 is associated with a greatly increased mortality from chronic lung disease [2] as well as from a wide range of diseases [3]. However, the severity of COPD that is established by FEV1 only partly explains the health-related quality of life in these patients [4]. In fact, in COPD patients, the degree of airflow obstruction is a poor predictor of dyspnea [5], [6], exercise tolerance [7], [8], and utilization of health resources including hospitalization [9], [10], [11]. There is accumulating evidence that inspiratory muscle function plays an important role in these aspects [12], [13]. Hyperinflated lungs flatten the curvature of the diaphragm and enlarge the rib cage. The altered configuration of the chest wall cavity places the respiratory muscles, including the diaphragm, at a mechanical disadvantage and impairs their force-generating capacity [14], [15]. However, the function of the diaphragm during breathing is not routinely assessed in COPD.
It is known that paradoxical inspiratory in-drawing of the lateral rib margin (Hoover's sign) can be observed in a significant number of patients with COPD [16], [17], [18]. This abnormal movement of the chest wall has been attributed to direct traction by the flattened diaphragm on the lateral rib margins [16], [19]. Although its presence has been reported in as many as 77% of patients with airflow obstruction [19], this sign is frequently forgotten. We hypothesized that Hoover's sign could reflect disadvantaged inspiratory muscle activity and, consequently, that its presence may have implications for exercise tolerance or for utilization of health resources. In order to ascertain these possibilities, we conducted a clinical study comparing two matched groups of patients with stable COPD, half of whom had Hoover's sign and half of whom did not.
Section snippets
Methods
Sixty patients with COPD attending the outpatient pulmonary clinic were included in the study. Patients were selected in order to obtain two comparable groups with regard to age, smoking habits, forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1, and FEV1/FVC values. Inclusion criteria were: male gender, age above 50 years, smoking or ex-smoking habit with more than 20 pack-years, a diagnosis of COPD according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines [20], FEV1 lower than 70% of predicted, clinically
Data analysis
Data are expressed as mean (S.D.) except when specified otherwise. Mean values of the variables between the two patient groups were compared using an unpaired t-test. The possible relationships between the variables were analyzed using Spearman's correlations. A p value below 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
The characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, smoking habit, and pulmonary function tests. The group of patients with Hoover's sign had a slightly higher BMI (28.6 vs. 26.3) and a lower oxygen saturation (93% vs. 95%). On the average, patients had a moderate to severe airflow limitation. Lung volumes were available for 30 patients (16 with Hoover's sign and 14 without), and values (percentage of predicted) were almost identical, with
Discussion
Of the various chest wall motion abnormalities described in patients with COPD, Hoover's sign is the most common and clinically the most easily recognizable [17]. Normally, the costal margin moves very little during quiet breathing but, if it does, it moves outwards and upwards. However, in patients with COPD, there is a greater tendency for it to move paradoxically [23]. Although this sign is present in a large number of patients with airflow limitation [17], [18], it is often forgotten during
References (28)
- et al.
The relationship between pulmonary function and dyspnea in obstructive lung disease
Chest
(1989) - et al.
Exercise limitation in obstructive lung disease
Chest
(1998) - et al.
Respiratory muscle function and drive in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Clin. Chest Med.
(2000) Mechanisms and measures of exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Clin. Chest Med.
(2000)Paradoxical movement of the lateral rib margin (Hoover sign) for detecting obstructive airway disease
Chest
(2002)- et al.
Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
(2001) - et al.
The relevance in adults of air-flow obstruction, but not of mucus hypersecretion, to mortality from chronic lung disease. Results from 20 years of prospective observation
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
(1983) - et al.
Impaired lung function and mortality risk in men and women: findings from the Renfrew and Paisley prospective population study
BMJ
(1996) - et al.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease stage and health-related quality of life. The quality of life of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease study group
Ann. Intern. Med.
(1997) - et al.
A factor analysis of dyspnea ratings, respiratory muscle strength, and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
(1992)