Original articleSexual dimorphism modulates the impact of cancer cachexia on lower limb muscle mass and function
Introduction
One third of adults will develop cancer and, in approximately 20% of patients, cachexia will influence adversely duration of survival.1 Cancer cachexia is usually characterised as a process associated with accelerated loss of skeletal muscle mass, with or without loss of fat mass.2 Although muscle wasting is a hallmark of cancer cachexia, there are relatively few data describing regional loss of muscle mass or function in either male or female patients. Muscle loss may have a direct influence on patients’ quality of life as well as a significant impact on treatment tolerance3 and is therefore an important potential therapeutic target.
Lower limb musculature (e.g. the quadriceps) is prone to wasting in patients undergoing prolonged bed rest4 and muscle mass correlates with strength in healthy adults.5 Therefore, it might be anticipated that cancer patients with loss of muscle mass would have at least a proportionate loss of muscle strength/power. Moreover, if the mechanical quality (MQ), defined as quadriceps strength/unit quadriceps cross-sectional area, also known as relative strength of muscle were reduced, the reduction in function would be proportionately greater. Quadriceps strength has been shown to be reduced in cachectic pancreatic cancer patients.6 However, when lower limb extensor strength was normalised to quadriceps cross sectional area (CSA), there was no apparent reduction in muscle MQ.6 In contrast, animal models have suggested that the process of cachexia involves selective and early loss of key elements of the contractile structures within skeletal muscle which would likely impact on muscle MQ.7 Moreover, ultrastructural analysis has demonstrated myofibrillar disarray, irregular muscle membranes and dystrophic muscle morphology in the muscles of tumour-bearing cachectic animals.7
Knowledge of the relationship between muscle mass and function and their potential influence on quality of life in cancer cachexia is limited. The aim of the present study was to characterise regional changes in muscle function in gastrointestinal cancer patients with cachexia. We hypothesized that cancer patients (male and female) with cachexia would have both poorer lower limb muscle strength/function and MQ and that this might impact on quality of life when compared with non-cachectic/low weight-loss (WL) cancer patients or healthy controls (HC).
Section snippets
Participants
Fifty four patients (35 males, mean age 66 yrs, range 39–88 yrs; 19 females, mean age 64 yrs, range 44–83 yrs) with gastrointestinal cancer (oesophageal, gastric, pancreatic, bile duct, rectal) were recruited. All patients were discussed at a regional multidisciplinary meeting and tumour staging was determined either pathologically or radiologically (for those not undergoing surgery) according to the international TNM/UICC classification. There were 5 stage I, 7 stage II, 28 stage III and 14
Demographics
The HC were older than the cancer patients (78 vs 65 yrs, p < 0.001), although the average age of non-cachectic and cachectic patients was similar in both males (mean (range): 68(43–88) years vs 62(39–76) years, respectively, p = 0.130) and females (64(44–76) years vs 63(44–83) years, respectively, p = 0.791). The average WL of cancer patients was 8.4% and all HC were weight-stable. The distribution in site of primary tumour was similar between non-cachectic and cachectic patients (Chi-squared p
Discussion
This study demonstrates that in gastrointestinal cancer patients there is variability in lower limb muscle function, MQ and mass according to the degree of WL and sex. While lower limb muscle mass, strength and power declined in male cancer patients, females appeared to experience attenuated loss of muscle mass and power. MQ was reduced in both male and female cancer patients, but only in females did it decline progressively with cachexia. Such sexual dimorphism extended to the impact of
Statement of authorship
NAS was responsible for patient recruitment, conduct of the study, acquisition and interpretation of data, statistical analysis and manuscript preparation, CG designed the MRI protocol and contributed to image analysis, AJM contributed to image analysis, BHT participated in patient recruitment, IJG contributed to statistical analysis, RJES participated in study design, JAR assisted with study design, KCHF was responsible for the study concept, obtaining approvals and assisted with manuscript
Conflict of interest statement
Each author declared no conflict of financial or personal interests in any company or organisation sponsoring this study.
Author agreement
All authors have made substantial contributions and final approval of the conceptions, drafting, and final version.
Acknowledgements
This project was supported financially by Cancer Research UK (Grant no: C1128/A7309) who had no involvement with study design, data collection or interpretation of data. We acknowledge the contributions of Dr Ian Beggs (Consultant Radiologist, RIE) for facilitating access to the MR facility and for assistance with interpretation of MR images, Lynne Thomson and Claire Malone (Radiographers, RIE) for supervision of MR scanning procedures, the staff of the RIE Clinical Research Facility and we
References (30)
- et al.
Dystrophin glycoprotein complex dysfunction: a regulatory link between muscular dystrophy and cancer cachexia
Cancer Cell
(2005) - et al.
Cachexia: a new definition
Clin Nutr
(2008) - et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging with k-means clustering objectively measures whole muscle volume compartments in sarcopenia/cancer cachexia
Clin Nutr
(2011) - et al.
Height-normalized indices of the body’s fat-free mass and fat mass: potentially useful indicators of nutritional status
Am J Clin Nutr
(1990) - et al.
Body composition, muscle function, and energy expenditure in patients with liver cirrhosis: a comprehensive study
Am J Clin Nutr
(2007) - et al.
Body composition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a contemporary view of cancer cachexia with the use of computed tomography image analysis
Am J Clin Nutr
(2010) Loss of skeletal muscle mass in aging: examining the relationship of starvation, sarcopenia and cachexia
Clin Nutr
(2007)- et al.
Definition of cancer cachexia: effect of weight loss, reduced food intake, and systemic inflammation on functional status and prognosis
Am J Clin Nutr
(2006) - et al.
Relationship of menopause to skeletal and muscle mass
Am J Clin Nutr
(1991) - et al.
Is fatigue after stroke associated with physical deconditioning? A cross-sectional study in ambulatory stroke survivors
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2011)
Cachexia, survival and the acute phase response
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care
Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus
Lancet Oncol
Body composition as an independent determinant of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy toxicity
Clin Cancer Res
Whole muscle contractile parameters and thickness loss during 35-day bed rest
Eur J Appl Physiol
Strength and cross-sectional area of human skeletal muscle
J Physiol
Cited by (73)
Agreement between muscle mass assessments by computed tomography and calf circumference in patients with cancer: A cross-sectional study
2022, Clinical Nutrition ESPENCitation Excerpt :Women also have higher fat mass in their legs compared to men [33]. Among patients with cancer, males present greater loss of muscle mass that affects physical function, while females appear to have attenuated loss of muscle mass and strength [34]. Sex hormones also play an important role in maintaining skeletal muscle homeostasis.
Physical activity and exercise training in cancer patients
2020, Clinical Nutrition ESPENPrognostic value of initial and longitudinal changes in body composition in metastatic pancreatic cancer
2024, Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
- c
KCHF and CAG share senior authorship in this work.