Original article
General thoracic
Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Miniforceps Biopsy in the Biopsy of Subcarinal Masses in Patients with Low Likelihood of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.02.031Get rights and content

Background

Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is used to sample mediastinal masses, but the value may be limited by the small specimen size obtained. In benign diseases and hematologic malignancies, the sample size from TBNA is often considered insufficient for diagnosis. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of obtaining histologic specimens from subcarinal masses using a 1.15-mm miniforceps under endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guidance and compared the diagnostic yield with TBNA alone.

Methods

Patients being evaluated for subcarinal lesions exceeding 2.5 cm (short axis) and without known or suspected non-small cell lung cancer were included. Bronchoscopy was performed, and EBUS-guided BNA of the lesion was performed first with a 22-gauge needle, followed by the 19-gauge needle. The miniforceps was then passed through the airway into the lesion (three to five passes) under real-time EBUS guidance. Three biopsy specimens were obtained.

Results

The study enrolled 75 patients (41 men; mean age, 51.5 years). Specimens were acquired from each patient using the three techniques and processed separately. A specific diagnosis was made in 36% of patients with the 22-gauge needle, 49% with the 19-gauge needle, and in 88% with the miniforceps. The increase in diagnostic yield with miniforceps was most significant in patients with sarcoidosis (88% vs 36% for TBNA, p = 0.001) or lymphoma (81% vs 35%, p = 0.038). No complications occurred.

Conclusions

Miniforceps biopsy, performed under real-time EBUS guidance, can be used to obtain tissue specimens from subcarinal masses adjacent to the airway. The diagnostic yield for lymphoma and sarcoidosis is superior to TBNA alone, and the procedure appears safe.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

From January 2006 to January 2007, consecutive patients referred for bronchoscopy and with subcarinal masses greater than 25 mm in the short axis on chest computed tomography were enrolled prospectively in the study. Patients with known or suspected non-small cell lung cancer undergoing mediastinal staging for this disease were not included because we and others have previously shown that EBUS-guided TBNA has excellent diagnostic yield in this population [7]. The study was approved by the

Results

These sequential techniques were performed at bronchoscopy in 74 patients (41 men) with a median age of 53 years (range, 27 to 71 years). The specimens obtained were suitable for analysis in all cases. A final diagnosis was available for all patients at follow-up and allowed calculation of the diagnostic yield for each technique of lymph node sampling (Table 1). The mean size of the masses sampled was 3.27 cm (range, 2.5 to 4.2 cm), and no significant correlation was seen between the size of

Comment

Chest physicians are commonly involved in the assessment of patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy. In the past these patients were commonly referred directly for a surgical biopsy through a mediastinoscopy. The advent of endoscopic and EBUS guidance in the last few years, which increase the yield from TBNA [5, 6, 7], as well as a recognition that in practice mediastinoscopy may not be used as well as it could [11], interest has been growing in noninvasive sampling of mediastinal lymph

Cited by (89)

  • Combined EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TBNA vs EBUS-TBNA Alone for Intrathoracic Adenopathy: A Meta-Analysis

    2022, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    The funnel plot scatter does not indicate any obvious publication bias (Figure 2B). Secondary subgroup analysis of 6 studies15,19-23 for sarcoidosis revealed a diagnostic yield of 58% (93 of 161) for EBUS-TBNA and 93% (150 of 161) for the combined EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-IFB group, with an inverse variance-weighted OR of 12.26 (95% CI, 5.96 to 25.22; P < .00001) and an I2 of 0%. The funnel plot scatter does not indicate any obvious publication bias (Supplemental Figure 2).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text