Ecology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the intensive care unit and the evolving role of water outlets as a reservoir of the organism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2005.03.006Get rights and content

In spite of the significant changes in the spectrum of organisms causing intensive care unit (ICU)-associated infections, Pseudomonas aeruginosa has held a nearly unchanged position in the rank order of pathogens causing ICU-related infections during the last 4 decades. Horizontal transmissions between patients have long been considered the most frequent source of P aeruginosa colonizations/infections. The application of molecular typing methods made it possible, during the last ∼7 years, to identify ICU tap water as a significant source of exogenous P aeruginosa isolates. A review of prospective studies published between 1998 and 2005 showed that between 9.7% and 68.1% of randomly taken tap water samples on different types of ICUs were positive for P aeruginosa, and between 14.2% and 50% of infection/colonization episodes in patients were due to genotypes found in ICU water. Faucets are easily accessable for preventive measures, and the installation of single-use filters on ICU water outlets appears to be an effective concept to reduce water-to-patient transmissions of this important nosocomial pathogen.

Section snippets

The changing microbial spectrum of infections in intensive care

The last 2 decades have witnessed significant changes in the spectrum of microorganisms causing nosocomial infections. Gram-negative enterobacteria, which in the 1970s and 1980s accounted for 30% to 50% of all disease-associated isolates in ICUs,2, 3 have been to a large extent replaced by gram-positive microorganisms such as staphylococci, enterocci, and corynebacteria.4, 5 The relative decrease of infections because of enterobacteria has been achieved by the successful implementation, in most

Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

In spite of these significant changes, P aeruginosa has held a nearly unchanged position in the rank order of pathogens causing ICU-related infections for more than 4 decades. In the newest US National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system report, P aeruginosa continues to represent the third most frequent organism associated with wound or pulmonary infections, the fourth most frequent organism causing urinary tract infection, and the fifth most frequent organism isolated from blood

Antibiotic resistance of P aeruginosa and treatment costs

Of particular concern is the increasing antibiotic resistance of P aeruginosa isolated from ICUs. NNIS data show a rise of resistance rates against commonly used antibiotics such as imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime by 15%, 9%, and 20%, respectively, between the periods 1998-2002 and 2003.11 Data from a single center in Denver, Colorado, showed a dramatic increase of resistance by more than 30% for fluoroquinolones, tobramycin, and imipenem.19 Multiresistance, defined as resistance to >3

Epidemiologic typing of P aeruginosa

Given the fact that P aeruginosa was discovered more than 100 years ago and that a multitude of scientific studies have dealt with the clinical manifestations, antibiotic resistance, and virulence factors of the organism, it is astonishing that relatively little insight into its reservoirs and transmission pathways has been gained. In contrast to gram-negative enterobacteria, no broadly applicable concept for the prevention of P aeruginosa infections has yet been developed.

One of the reasons

Reservoirs and modes of transmission

Using molecular methods, horizontal strain transmissions were proven to be one of the most frequent causes of acquisition of P aeruginosa in the ICU. A series of carefully performed studies examining the epidemiology of P aeruginosa came from a group of researchers from The Netherlands. In their first study, Bergmans et al described the sequence of colonization in 10 ICU patients later diagnosed with VAP.40 Sequential samples taken from the oropharynx, trachea, stomach, and rectum were

Occurrence of P aeruginosa in moist habitats

P aeruginosa is known to thrive well in moist and humid habitats in which the organism can multiply to large numbers, even in the presence of minimal amounts of nutrients. The organism is also a common constituent of polymicrobial biofilms in plumbing systems and drain pipes. In the era of classical typing methods, numerous attempts have been made to identify relationships between disease-associated and waterborne strains.21, 23, 24, 25 However, both because of the variability of classical

Molecular typing data pointing to tap water as a source of P aeruginosa

Studies using molecular typing techniques and comparing water and patient isolates were first initiated in the early 1990s. Tredget et al39 studied an outbreak of wound, respiratory, and bloodstream infections causing significant morbidity in a burn unit in Canada. As demonstrated by pilin gene typing, the strains infecting 59 patients were found to belong to a single genotye that was also detected in hydrotherapy tanks used for immersion of patients. After cessation of hydrotherapy, the strain

Methodologic aspects of testing for P aeruginosa

For future studies of this kind, it will be essential to use a standardized and sensitive technique for the investigation of taps and running water. The study by Blanc et al shows that examining small volumes of water is less sensitive than performing swabs from the inside of outlets.35 We recommend the following procedure for sampling water that proved to be very sensitive in our studies: (1) take water from tap to be examined during a period of less intense use, eg, at 7 am on Monday mornings

Mechanical cleaning of taps and aerators

Uniformly, the above-mentioned studies showed that P aeruginosa colonization of water taps was not a matter of microbial contamination of drinking water supplied by the mains. The microorganism probably gains access to the taps by retrograde contamination, thereafter establishing itself deeply in the bushings of the aerator and mixing valves and in niches and threads of fittings and fixtures. Strategies to keep the organism at low densities should always include careful cleaning and regular

The concept of point-of-use water filtration

In our own study of the surgical ICU of a teaching hospital, we observed approximately 5 to 10 cases of P aeruginosa infection or colonization per month, along with uniformly positive tap water cultures. On this ward, we decided to start a program of point-of-use water filtration using disposable tap-mounted filters used for 7 days. Filtered water proved to be always sterile after mounting the filters. Thereafter, the number of infections and colonizations fell constantly, reaching a level of 1

References (57)

  • J. Hernandez et al.

    Arbitrary primed PCR fingerprinting and serotyping of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains

    FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol

    (1997)
  • J. Garaizar et al.

    Computerized restriction endonuclease analysis compared with O-serotype and phage type in the epidemiologic fingerprinting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains

    Clin Microbiol Infect

    (1997)
  • H.J. Kolmos et al.

    Outbreak of infection in a burns unit due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa originating from contaminated tubing used for irrigation of patients

    J Hosp Infect

    (1993)
  • F. Bert et al.

    Multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak associated with contaminated tap water in a neurosurgery intensive care unit

    J Hosp Infect

    (1998)
  • R. Shrivastava et al.

    Suboptimal chlorine treatment of drinkung water leads to selection of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf

    (2004)
  • J. Hall et al.

    Provision of safe potable water for immunocompromised patients in hospital

    J Hosp Infect

    (2004)
  • P. Gastmeier

    Nosocomial infection surveillance and control policies

    Curr Opin Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • R.C. Spencer

    Predominant pathogens found in the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care Study

    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

    (1996)
  • P. Combes et al.

    Nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated patients, a prospective randomized evaluation of the Stericath closed suctioning system

    Intensive Care Med

    (2000)
  • T.M. Perl et al.

    Intranasal mupirocin to prevent postoperative Staphylococcus aureus infections

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • C. von Eiff et al.

    Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Study Group

    N Engl J Med

    (2001)
  • National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report

    Data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004

    Am J Infect Control

    (2004)
  • M.J. Richards et al.

    Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2000)
  • H. Dupont et al.

    Impact of appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy on the outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia

    Intensive Care Med

    (2001)
  • G. Zanetti et al.

    Cefepime versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, evaluator-blind, prospective, randomized study

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2003)
  • H. Wisplinghoff et al.

    Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • M.L. Panceri et al.

    Aetiology and prognosis of bacteraemia in Italy

    Epidemiol Infect

    (2004)
  • Y. Carmeli et al.

    Health and economic outcomes of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Arch Intern Med

    (1999)
  • Cited by (236)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text