Bacteriology
Multiplex PCR for rapid and differential diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in respiratory infections

Presented in part at the Meeting of the Italian Society for the Study of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Tuema Section, Certosa di Pontignano (Siena), Italy, June, 13, 1998.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-8893(99)00070-XGet rights and content

Abstract

A duplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was developed for the simultaneous detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. A study of 163 respiratory specimens from in-patients of the “Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Nancy” showed the good sensitivity of this duplex PCR allowing the detection of C. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae from 8 and 13 patients, respectively, whereas the culture was negative for C. pneumoniae for all the samples and positive for M. pneumoniae only in 9 cases. The value of these results has been confirmed by running on the same samples specific nested PCRs for these two microorganisms that gave the same results. Thus, the proposed duplex amplification technique may facilitate the diagnosis of infection by these two agents that are difficult to isolate.

Introduction

Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae are responsible for community-acquired respiratory tract infections, in particular atypical pneumonia Clyde 1993, Kuo et al 1995. M. pneumoniae infections are acute and may require hospitalization, whereas C. pneumoniae infection, frequently asymptomatic, can be responsible for long lasting diseases, more severe in elderly patients (Troy et al. 1997). For a specific treatment to be administered a rapid laboratory diagnosis must be obtained. Isolation of M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae requires 6 to 21 days and is often negative. Rapid laboratory tests such as antigen detection or hybridization are of limited sensitivity and serology is often unconclusive. Thus, gene amplification that permits a rapid and sensitive diagnosis is the method of choice Ieven and Goossens 1997, Whelen and Persing 1996. When different agents are searched for, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is of interest Cadieux et al 1993, Valassina et al 1997. Thus we have devised such a method for detection of C. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae and applied it to 163 clinical samples from in-patients with respiratory symptoms of Nancy University Hospital.

Section snippets

Clinical samples and cultures

During the winter-spring 1998 season, 129 broncho-alveolar lavages (BALs), 20 bronchial aspirates, 12 pharyngeal swabs, and 2 sputa were collected from 163 in-patients of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Nancy, France. All patients presented with respiratory symptoms and were aged from 1 to 81. An aliquot (200 μL) of the clinical sample was used for isolation of C. pneumoniae onto HL cells infected in triplicate (Kuo and Grayston 1990). A blind passage was performed in duplicate five

Results

Multiplex PCR, as well as single PCR with the same primers, detected as little as 2 CFU of M. pneumoniae and 2 IFU of C. pneumoniae whatever the sample tested: extracted DNA from buffer dilution or from simulated clinical samples (data not shown). The specificity of the PCR reaction was satisfactory as no aspecific amplification was noted with any of the tested pathogens (Fig. 1). All 163 DNA extracts proved amplifiable as primers for γ-interferon gave the expected amplicon with all extracts

Discussion

As expected, PCR proved more sensitive than culture for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae infections. For M. pneumoniae, antibiotic therapy or inadequate management of samples may explain the low isolation rate. Isolation of C. pneumoniae is seldom obtained and its isolation from elderly patients is almost never achieved (Kuo et al. 1995). Thus, a negative result of culture is not surprizing. Recently, Gröndahl et al. (1999) presented a multiplex RT-PCR protocol detecting up to

References (15)

  • M Valassina et al.

    Rapid detection of different RNA respiratory virus species by multiplex RT-PCRapplication to clinical specimens

    Clin Diagn Virol

    (1997)
  • C Bernet et al.

    Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by using the polymerase chain reaction

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1989)
  • N Cadieux et al.

    Use of a triplex polymerase chain reaction for the detection and differentiation of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium in the presence of human DNA

    J Gen Microbiol

    (1993)
  • W.A Clyde

    Clinical overview of typical Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections

    Clin Infect Dis

    (1993)
  • C Gaydos et al.

    Diagnostic utility of PCR-enzyme immunoassay, culture, and serology for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1994)
  • B Gröndahl et al.

    Rapid identification of nine microorganisms causing acute respiratory tract infections by single-tube multiplex reverse transcription-PCRfeasibility study

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1999)
  • M Ieven et al.

    Relevance of nucleic acid amplification techniques for diagnosis of respiratory tract infections in the clinical laboratory

    Clin Microbiol Rev

    (1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Atypical bacterial pathogen infection in children with acute bronchiolitis in northeast Thailand

    2011, Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    The chosen primers of M pneumoniae enclosed a specific 144 bp fragment: MP5-1 (5′-GAA GCT TAT GGT ACA GGT TGG-3′) and MP5-2 (5′-ATT ACC ATC CTT GTT GTA AGG-3′).11 The primers for C pneumonia—specific for the Omp1 gene—were: Cpn1 (5′-GTT CAA TCT CGT TGG TTT ATT-3′, nt 453–473) and Cpn3 (5′-TCC AAT GTA TGG CAC TAA AGA-3′, nt 858–838, 405 bp).12 Every sample with a negative result using multiplex PCR was reanalyzed using specific nested PCRs under the same conditions to differentiate between the two pathogens.

  • Specific Diagnostic Tests for Atypical Respiratory Tract Pathogens

    2010, Infectious Disease Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Because M pneumoniae is only one of a variety of fastidious and/or slow-growing pathogenic microorganisms responsible for RTI with clinically similar manifestations, there has been considerable interest and effort to develop multiplex PCR assays for single-step detection of multiple causative agents. Most assays now include gene targets for M pneumoniae, C pneumoniae, L pneumophila, and, occasionally, other organisms.26,30–40 Still, monoplex assays seem to have higher sensitivity and specificity than multiplex assays.41

  • Development and evaluation of a multiplex test for the detection of atypical bacterial DNA in community-acquired pneumonia during childhood

    2009, Clinical Microbiology and Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although there are numerous single PCR systems for microorganism detection, multiplex PCR protocols are less common, despite the savings that they offer in time and cost. Multiplex PCR systems are available that include some of the microorganisms investigated in the present study, e.g. M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae [28], C. pneumoniae, C. psittaci and M. pneumoniae [29], C. pneumoniae, M. pneumoniae and L. pneumophila [30], and C. pneumoniae, M. pneumoniae and genus Legionella [24]. Others include M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae with Streptococcus pneumoniae and H. influenzae [23].

  • Respiratory infections: Pneumonia, lung abscess, and empyema

    2008, Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Classic findings on chest radiographs include subsegmental atelectasis and interstitial infiltrates. A diagnosis may be made on clinical grounds, whereas polymerase chain reaction (PCR), culture, and serology can be used to confirm the diagnosis.13,14 Oral treatment with macrolides, such as erythromycin and clarithromycin, is usually sufficient.

  • Chlamydia pneumoniae infection after lung transplantation

    2005, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text