Morphometric model for pulmonary diffusing capacity I. Membrane diffusing capacity

https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5687(93)90001-QGet rights and content

Abstract

The pulmonary diffusing capacity is related to the quantitative design characteristics of the pulmonary gas exchanger. The current model for estimating DlO2 from morphometric data breaks the diffusion path for O2 into four steps, three of which represent the membrane part of DlO2. A critique of this model on the basis of newer evidence leads to a modification of the model where the path from the alveolar surface to the erythrocyte membrane is considered as a single step. The structural determinant of this model for DmO2 is the ratio of effective diffusion surface to effective total barrier thickness. The effective surface is formulated as a fraction of the alveolar surface area, the most robust measure of lung design, whereas the effective barrier thickness is the harmonic mean distance - or mean proximity - between alveolar surface and erythrocyte surface. The methods for obtaining the morphometric measurements are discussed. The results show that the new morphometric estimates of DmO2 are 33% lower than those obtained with the old model, resulting in a reduction of the estimates of DlO2 by 10–20%.

References (32)

  • S. Bur et al.

    Lung fixation by airway instillation: Effects on capillary hematocrit

    Exp. Lung Res.

    (1985)
  • M. Constantinopol et al.

    Oxygen transport during exercise in large mammals. II. Oxygen uptake by the pulmonary gas exchanger

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (1989)
  • J.D. Crapo et al.

    Cell number and cell characteristics of the normal human lung

    Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.

    (1982)
  • L.M. Cruz-Orive

    Estimation of sheet thickness distributions from linear and plane sections

    Biometr. J.

    (1979)
  • J.A. Dempsey

    Is the lung built for exercise?

    Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.

    (1986)
  • J. Dupuis et al.

    Use of norepinephrine uptake to measure lung capillary recruitment with exercise

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (119)

    • Can DL<inf>NO</inf>/DL<inf>CO</inf> ratio offset prejudicial effects of functional heterogeneities in acinar regions?

      2020, Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Using these DLCO and DLNO values, we calculated DMCO and Vc, obtaining 62 mL/min/mmHg for DMCO and 101 mL for Vc when KDNO/CO, θNO, and θCO values are 2.34, 60, and 0.56, respectively; thus, physiologic DMCO/Vc amounts to 0.61/mmHg/min at a resting condition. Based on the enormous studies with regard to the lung morphometry by Weibel et al. (Weibel, 1963, 2017; Weibel et al., 1993, 2005; Haefeli-Bleuer and Weibel, 1988; Hsia et al., 2016), we assumed that the best values of morphometric DMO2 and Vc at TLC level, where single-breath DLCO and DLNO are measured, are 308 mL/min/mmHg and 180 mL, respectively. These morphometric values were obtained from the air-filled, perfusion-fixed human lung at inflation level of TLC.

    • Morphometric and morphological study of the respiratory organs of the bimodally-breathing African sharptooth catfish (Clarias gariepinus): Burchell (1822)

      2018, Zoology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Anatomically, it correlates directly with surface area and inversely with thickness of the barrier (Fig. 2F). Compared with the τt, the τht is the more appropriate parameter for determining Dto2 (Weibel and Knight, 1964; Weibel, 1970/71; Hughes, 1972; Maina and Maloiy, 1986; Weibel et al., 1993; da Costa et al., 2007). For the gills, Dto2 was determined from the TGRSA and the τht(WBB) as follows:Dto2 = (Kto2 x TGRSA)/τht(WBB)Kto2 is the Krogh’s O2 diffusion coefficient across the tissue barrier.

    • The blood transfer conductance for CO and NO

      2017, Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is no direct evidence for or against this proposition, but a companion paper (Borland et al., 2017) argues that an infinite value for θNO in vivo is feasible. Physiologically, an infinite θNO in vivo means a lower estimate of DMCO, (and higher 1/DMCO and so lower Rrc/RTot% for CO) and one which, even on exercise, is much lower than morphometric measurements of membrane diffusing capacity (Weibel et al., 1993). With a finite θNO, estimates of DMCO on exercise, using a combined NO–CO analysis, approach morphometric estimates.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text