Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: 13 years’ experience

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Major lung resection by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has been proven to be both safe and technically feasible, but is not routinely performed in most hospitals. The aim of this paper is to show our technique for VATS lobectomy and our experience and outcomes obtained.

Methods

We have performed a retrospective review included all patients undergoing major pulmonary resection by VATS at the General and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville (Spain) since 1992. The clinical records of all patients were drawn from the hospital archive and data for the following variables were recorded for analysis: age, sex, clinical diagnosis, clinical status, date of surgery, type of surgery, inoperability, conversion to conventional surgery and reasons, duration of surgery and intraoperative complications, postoperative and long-term complications, postoperative stay, diagnosis, definitive status, and mortality. We also describe our surgical technique for each lobectomy.

Results

A total of 237 major pulmonary resections were performed, on 203 males and 34 males, with a mean age of 61.43 years (non-small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma: 204, benign processes: 24, carcinoid tumors: 4, and lobectomy due to metastases: 5). The overall conversion rate was 14.01%. Mean duration of lobectomy was 153 min, with a median of 98 min, and mean postoperative stay was 4.2 days. The morbidity rate was 15.18%, mostly involving minor complications. Perioperative mortality was 3.7%. The actuarial 5-year survival rate was 77.7%.

Conclusions

VATS lobectomy is a viable safe procedure that meets oncological criteria for lung cancer surgery. In our experience, VATS is currently to be considered ideally indicated for certain benign processes and for T1-T2 N0 M0 bronchogenic carcinomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roviaro G, Varoli F, Vergani C, Maciocco M (2002) State of the art in the thoracoscopic surgery: a personal experience of 2000 videothoracoscopic procedures and an overview of the literature. Surg Endosc 16:881–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gharagozloo F, Tempesta B, Margolis M, Alexander EP (2003) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1009–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Solaini L, Prusciano F, Bagioni P, Di Francesco F, Basilio Poddie D (2001) Video-assisted thoracic surgery major pulmonary resections. Present experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20:437–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shiraishi T, Shirakusa T, Miyosi T, Hiratsuka M, Yamamoto S, Iwasaki A (2006) A completely thoracoscopic lobectomy/segmentectomy for primary lung cancer- technique, feasibility, and advantages. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54:202–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller C B (2006) Video-Assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: Experience with 1100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 81:421–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson J, Walker W (2006) Developing a VATS lobectomy programme–can VATS lobectomy be taught? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29:806–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Congregado M, Jimenez R, Loscertales J (2006) Resezioni polmonary Maggiore In: Lavini C, Ruggiero C, Morandi U (eds) Chirurgia toracica videoassistita. Springer-Verlag, Milano (Italia) pp 155–167

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weissberg D, Schachner A (2000) Video-assisted thoracic surgery-state of the art. Ann Ital Chir 71:539–543

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hermansson U, Konstantinov IE, Aren C (1998) Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: the initial Swedish experience. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10:285–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rothenberg SS (2003) Experience with thoracoscopic lobectomy in infants and children. J Pediatric Surg 38:102–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koren JP, Bocage JP, Geis WP, Caccavale RJ (2003) Major thoracic surgery in octogenarians: the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach. Surg Endosc 17:632–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cano I, Anton-Pacheco JL, Garcia A, Rothenberg S (2006) Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in infants. Eur J Cardiovasc Surg 29:997–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Walker WS (1998) Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: Edinburgh experience. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10:291–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, Shimizu K (2000) Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-asissted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1644–1646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nomori H, Ohtsuka T, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K (2003) Difference in the impairment of vital capacity and 6-minute walking after a lobectomy performed by thoracoscopic surgery, an anterior limited thoracotomy, an anteroaxillary thoracotomy, and a posterolateral thoracotomy. Surg Today 33:7–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N (2001) Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 72:362–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stammberger U, Steinacher C, Hillinger S, Schmid RA, Kinsbergen T, Weder W (2000) Early and long-term complaints following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: evaluation in 173 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18:7–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yim AP, Wan S, Lee TW, Arifi AA (2000) VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 70:243–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Craig SR, Leaver HA, Yap PL, Pugh GC, Walker WS (2001) Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20:455–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tschernko EM, Hofer S, Bieglmayer C, Wisser W, Haider W (1996) Early postoperative stress: video-assisted wedge resection/lobectomy vs conventional axillarythoracotomy. Chest 109:1636–1642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sollitto F, De Palma A, Lopez C, Loizzi M (2003) Minimally invasive thoracic surgery versus standard surgery. Ann Ital Chir 74:299–307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roviaro G, Varoli F, Vergani C, Nucca O, Maciocco M, Grignani F (2004) Long-term survival after videothoracoscopic lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Chest 126:725–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Esato K (2000) Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy achieves a satisfactory long-term prognosis in patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer. World J Surg 24:27–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker WS, Cadispoti M, Soon SY, Stamenkovic S, Carnochan F, Pugh G (2003) Long-term outcomes following VATS lobectomy for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sagawa M, Sato M, Sakurada A, Matsumura Y, Endo C, Handa M, Kondo T (2002) A prospective trial of systematic nodal dissection for lung cancer by video-assisted thoracic surgery: can it be perfect? Ann Thorac Surg 73:900–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Iwasaki A. Shirakusa T, Shiraishi T, Yamamoto S (2004) Results of video-assisted thoracic surgery for stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Avda. Dr. Fedriani 1, 41071, Seville, Spain

    Miguel Congregado, Rafael Jimenez Merchan, Gregorio Gallardo, Javier Ayarra & Jesus Loscertales

Authors
  1. Miguel Congregado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rafael Jimenez Merchan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gregorio Gallardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Javier Ayarra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jesus Loscertales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Congregado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Congregado, M., Merchan, R.J., Gallardo, G. et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: 13 years’ experience. Surg Endosc 22, 1852–1857 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9720-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9720-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation