Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reproducibility of volume and densitometric measures of emphysema on repeat computed tomography with an interval of 1 week

  • Computed Tomography
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The reproducibilities of CT lung volume and densitometric measures of emphysema were assessed over 1 week. The influence of breathhold on reproducibility was assessed.

Methods

HRCT was performed on 44 subjects at inspiration on two visits with a 7-day interval. CT lung volume, relative area below -950HU (RA950-raw), and 15th percentile density (PD15-raw) were computed. Volume correction was used to obtain RA950-adj and PD15-adj. Reproducibilities between visits were assessed using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and repeatability coefficient (RC). Reproducibilities were compared between raw and adjusted measures. Differences between visits were computed for volume and density measures. Correlations were computed for density differences versus volume difference. Subgroup analysis was performed using a 0.25 L volume difference threshold.

Results

High CCC were observed for all measures in full group (CCC > 0.97). Reproducibilities of volume (RC = 0.67 L), RA950-raw (RC = 2.3%), and PD15-raw (RC = 10.6HU) were observed. Volume correction significantly improved PD15 (RC = 3.6HU) but not RA950 (RC = 1.7%). RA950-raw and PD15-raw had significantly better RC in <0.25 L subgroup than ≥0.25 L. Significant correlations with volume were observed for RA950-raw and PD15-raw (R 2 > 0.71), but not RA950-adj or PD15-adj (R 2 < 0.11).

Conclusions

Good breathhold and RA950 reproducibilities were achieved. PD15 was less reproducible but improved with volume correction or superior breathhold reproduction.

Key Points

• Good breath-hold reproducibility is achievable between multiple CT examinations.

• Reproducibility of densitometric measures may be improved by statistical volume correction.

• Volume correction may result in decreased signal.

• Densitometric reproducibility may also be improved by achieving good breath-hold reproduction.

• Careful consideration of signal and noise is necessary in reproducibility assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gold. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Executive summary, updated 2009. http://www.goldcopd.org. Accessed September 7, 2011

  2. Hurd S (1984) The impact of COPD on lung health worldwide: epidemiology and incidence. Chest 117(2 Suppl):1S–4S

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hayhurst MD, Flenley DC, McLean A, Wightman AJA, MacNec W, Wright D et al (1984) Diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema by computerised tomography. Lancet 2:320–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Muller NL, Staples CA, Miller RR, Abboud RT (1988) Density mask. An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. Chest 94:782–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dirksen A, Friis M, Olesen KP, Skovgaard LT, Sorensen K (1997) Progress of emphysema in severe α1-antitrypsin deficiency as assessed by annual CT. Acta Radiol 38:826–832

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldin JG (2004) Quantitative CT of emphysema and the airways. J Thorac Imaging 19(4):235–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spouge D, Mayo JR, Cardoso W, Muller NL (1993) Panacinar emphysema: CT and pathologic findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17(5):710–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gevenois PA, De Vuyst P, de Maertelaer V, Zanen J, Jacobovitz D, Cosio MG, Yernault JC (1996) Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154(1):187–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pauls S, Gulkin D, Feuerlein S, Muche R, Kruger S, Schmidt SA, Dharaiya E, Brambs HJ, Hetzel M (2010) Assessment of COPD severity by computed tomography: correlation with lung functional testing. Clin Imaging 34:172–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson PJ, Kreel L (1979) Pulmonary tissue attenuation with computed tomography: comparison of inspiration and expiration scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 3(6):740–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaker SB, Dirksen A, Laursen LC, Skovgaard LT, Holstein-Rathlou NH (2004) Volume adjustment of lung density by computed tomography scans in patients with emphysema. Acta Radiol 45:417–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown MS, McNitt-Gray MF, Pais R, Shah SK, Qing D, Da Costa I, Aberle DR, Goldin JG (2007) CAD in clinical trials: current role and architectural requirements. J Comput Med Imaging Graph 31:332–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown MS, McNitt-Gray MF, Mankovich NJ, Hiller J, Wilson LS, Goldin JG, Aberle DR (1997) Method for segmenting chest CT image data using an anatomical model: preliminary results. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16(6):828–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gould GA, MacNee W, McLean A, Warren PM, Redpath A, Best JJ et al (1988) CT measurements of lung density in life can quantitate distal airspace enlargement: an essential defining feature of human emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 137:380–392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stoel BC, Putter H, Bakker ME, Dirksen A, Stockley RA, Piitulainen E, Russi EW, Parr D, Shaker SB, Reiber JH, Stolk J (2008) Volume correction in computed tomography densitometry for follow-up studies on pulmonary emphysema. Proc Am Thorac Soc 5(9):919–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dirksen A, Dijkman JH, Madsen F, Stoel B, Hutchison DCS, Ulrik CS, Skovgaard LT, Kok-Jensen A, Rudolphus A, Seersholm N, Vrooman HA, Reiber JH, Hansen NC, Heckscher T, Viskum K, Stolk J (1999) A randomized clinical trial of alpha 1-antitrypsin augmentation therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:1468–1472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parr DG, Stoel BC, Stolk J, Stockley RA (2006) Validation of computed tomographic lung densitometry for monitoring emphysema in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. Thorax 61(6):485–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin LI (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45(1):255–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CPM, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J (2005) Standardization of spirometry. Eur Respir J 26(2):319–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sciurba FC, Ernst A, Herth FJ, Strange C, Criner GJ, Marquette CH, Kovitz KL, Chiacchierini RP, Goldin J, McLennan G, for the VENT Study Group (2010) A Randomized study of endobronchial valves for advanced emphysema. N Engl J Med 363:1233–1244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Coxson HO, Nasute Fauerbach PV, Storness-Bliss C, Muller NL, Cogswell S, Dillard DH, Finger CL, Springmeyer SC (2008) Computed tomography assessment of lung volume changes after bronchial valve treatment. Eur Respir J 32(6):1443–1450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Parr DG, Sevenoaks M, Deng CQ, Stoel BC, Stockley RA (2008) Detection of emphysema progression in alpha 1-antytrpsin deficiency using CT densitometry; Methodological advances. Respir Res 9:21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown MS, Kim HJ, Abtin F, Da Costa I, Pais R, Ahmad S, Angel E, Ni C, Kleerup EC, Gjertson DW, McNitt-Gray MF, Goldin JG (2010) Reproducibility of lung and lobar volume measurements using computed tomography. Acad Radiol 17(3):316–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, 924 Westwood Blvd., Ste. 615, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Daniel Chong, Eva M. van Rikxoort, Laura Guzman, Maryam Khatonabadi, Maya Galperin-Aizenberg, Heidi Coy, Katherine Yang & Yongha Jung

  2. Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, 924 Westwood Blvd., Ste. 615, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Matthew S. Brown, Hyun J. Kim, Michael F. McNitt-Gray & Jonathan G. Goldin

Authors
  1. Daniel Chong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew S. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hyun J. Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eva M. van Rikxoort
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laura Guzman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael F. McNitt-Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maryam Khatonabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Maya Galperin-Aizenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Heidi Coy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Katherine Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yongha Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jonathan G. Goldin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Chong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chong, D., Brown, M.S., Kim, H.J. et al. Reproducibility of volume and densitometric measures of emphysema on repeat computed tomography with an interval of 1 week. Eur Radiol 22, 287–294 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2277-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2277-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation