Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is standardised 18F-FDG uptake value an outcome predictor in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Recent studies have demonstrated the relevance of 18F-FDG uptake as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence of operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This corresponds with the experimental finding that FDG uptake correlates with the proliferative activity of tumour cells (Higashi et al., J Nucl Med 2000;41:85-92). On the basis of these observations, we studied the influence of FDG uptake on prognosis and occurrence of distant metastases in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

One hundred and fifty-nine patients with NSCLC of UICC stage IIIA or IIIB were included in the study. In all patients, neoadjuvant treatment was planned to achieve operability. FDG PET was performed as an additional staging procedure prior to the initiation of therapy. Clinical outcome data in terms of overall survival, disease-free survival and incidence of distant metastases could be obtained for 137 patients and were correlated with the average standardised uptake value of the tumour (SUVavg). Furthermore, other factors influencing SUVavg and patient outcome (histological tumour type, grading, UICC stage, tumour size) were analysed.

Results

SUVavg was significantly influenced by tumour histology, UICC stage and tumour size. No significant difference could be shown for grading. In 38 out of the 159 patients (24%), FDG PET revealed previously unsuspected distant metastases. The incidence of distant metastases significantly correlated with SUVavg. Overall survival tended to decrease with increasing SUVavg; however, significance was only reached when a cut-off of 12.0 was applied (p=0.05).

Conclusion

FDG uptake is an independent prognostic factor in patients with UICC stage III NSCLC, although less distinctively so than has been reported for stage I/II tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saunders CA, Dussek JE, O’Doherty MJ, Maisey MN. Evaluation of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose whole body positron emission tomography imaging in the staging of lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:790-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schrevens L, Lorent N, Dooms C, Vansteenkiste J. The role of PET scan in diagnosis, staging, and management of non-small cell lung cancer. The Oncologist 2004;9(6):633-43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bury T, Dowlati A, Paulus P, Corhay JL, Hustinx R, Ghaye B, et al. Whole-body 18FDG positron emission tomography in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Eur Respir J 1997;10:2529-34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis P, Griffin S, Marsden P, Gee T, Nunan T, Malsey M, et al. Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in preoperative evaluation of lung cancer. Lancet 1994;344:1265-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pieterman RM, Van Putten JW, Meuzelaar JJ, Mooyaart EL, Vaalburg W, Koeter GH, et al. Preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer with positron emission tomography. N Engl J Med 2000;343:254-61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hicks RJ, Kalff V, MacManus MP, Ware RE, Hogg A, McKenzie AF, et al. 18F-FDG PET provides high-impact and powerful prognostic stratification in staging newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1596-604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoekstra CJ, Stroobants SG, Hoekstra OS, Vansteenkiste J, Biesma B, Schramel FJ, et al. The value of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the selection of patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer for combined modality treatment. Lung Cancer 2003;39:151-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmucking M, Baum RP, Griesinger F, Presselt N, Bonnet R, Przetak C, et al. Molecular whole-body cancer staging using positron emission tomography: consequences for therapeutic management and metabolic radiation treatment planning. Recent Results Cancer Res 2003;162:195-202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eschmann SM, Friedel G, Paulsen F, Budach W, Harer-Mouline C, Dohmen BM, et al. FDG-PET for staging in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) scheduled for neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:804-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Arisaka Y, Sakuma T, Nambu Y, Oguchi M, et al. 18F-FDG uptake as a biologic prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2002;43:39-45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahuja V, Coleman RE, Herndon J, Patz EF. The prognostic significance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 1998;83:918-24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong HJ, Min JJ, Park JM, Chung JK, Kim BT, Jeong JM, et al. Determination of the prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by using positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2002;23:865-70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martini N, Bains MS, Burt ME, Zakowski MF, McCormack P, Rusch VW, et al. Incidence of local recurrence and second primary tumors in resected stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109(1):120-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Komaki R, Cox JD, Hartz AJ, Byhardt RW, Perez-Tamayo C, Clowry L, et al. Characteristics of long-term survivors after treatment for inoperable carcinoma of the lung. Am J Clin Oncol 1985;8(5):362-70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Yagishita M, Arisaka Y, Sakurai A, Oguchi M, et al. FDG PET measurement of the proliferative potential of non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2000;41:85-92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vesselle H, Schmidt RA, Pugsley JM, Li M, Kohlmyer SG, Vallires E, et al. Lung cancer proliferation correlates with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:3837-44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Ayabe K, Sakurai A, Seki H, Nambu Y, et al. FDG PET in the evaluation of the aggressiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma: correlation with histopathologic features. Nucl Med Commun 2000;21:707-14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, Dupont PJ, De Leyn PR, Verbeken EK, Deneffe GJ, et al. Prognostic importance of the standardized uptake value on 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of 125 cases. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:3201-6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keyes JW Jr. SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med 1995;36:1836-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Eschmann.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-1984-8

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eschmann, S.M., Friedel, G., Paulsen, F. et al. Is standardised 18F-FDG uptake value an outcome predictor in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33, 263–269 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-1953-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-1953-2

Keywords

Navigation