Skip to main content
Log in

Computed tomography dose and variability of airway dimension measurements: how low can we go?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Quantitative CT shows promise as an outcome measure for cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease in infancy, but must be accomplished at a dose as low as reasonably achievable.

Objective

To determine the feasibility of ultra-low-dose CT for quantitative measurements of airway dimensions.

Materials and methods

Two juvenile pigs were anesthetized and their lungs scanned at 25 cm H2O face-mask pressure in apnoea using beam currents of 5, 10, 20, 40 and 100 mAs. The lumen diameters and wall thicknesses of matched airways (n=22) at each dose were measured by two observers using validated software. Measurement variability at each dose was compared to that at 100 mAs (reference dose) for large and small airways (lumen diameter <2.5 mm).

Results

Lowering CT dose (mAs) affected measurement variability for lumen diameter of small and large airways (P<0.001) and for wall thickness of small (P<0.001), but not large (P=0.63), airways. To obtain the same measurement variability at 5 mAs as at 100 mAs, four to six small airways or one to three large airways have to be measured and averaged.

Conclusion

Quantitative airway measurements are feasible on images obtained at as low as 5 mAs, but more airways need to be measured to compensate for greater measurement variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Jong PA, Ottink MD, Robben SG, et al (2004) Pulmonary disease assessment in cystic fibrosis: comparison of CT scoring systems and value of bronchial and arterial dimension measurements. Radiology 231:434–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Jong PA, Nakano Y, Hop WC, et al (2005) Changes in airway dimensions on computed tomography scans of children with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172:218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Long FR, Williams RS, Castile RG (2004) Structural airway abnormalities in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 144:154–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Jong PA, Lindblad A, Rubin L, et al (2006) Progression of lung disease on computed tomography and pulmonary function tests in children and adults with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 61:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Jong PA, Nakano Y, Lequin MH, et al (2004) Progressive damage on high resolution computed tomography despite stable lung function in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 23:93–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brody AS, Tiddens HA, Castile RG, et al (2005) Computed tomography in the evaluation of cystic fibrosis lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172:1246–1252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson TE (2004) High-resolution CT scanning: potential outcome measure. Curr Opin Pulm Med 10:537–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Jong PA, Mayo JR, Golmohammadi K, et al (2006) Estimation of cancer mortality associated with repetitive computed tomography scanning. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173:199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Jong PA, Nakano Y, Lequin MH, et al (2006) Dose reduction for CT in children with cystic fibrosis: is it feasible to reduce the number of images per scan? Pediatr Radiol 36:50–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–233; discussion 242–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayo JR, Aldrich J, Muller NL (2003) Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 228:15–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Slovis TL (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality? Radiology 223:5–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Long FR, Castile RG, Brody AS, et al (1999) Lungs in infants and young children: improved thin-section CT with a noninvasive controlled-ventilation technique – initial experience. Radiology 212:588–593

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakano Y, Whittall KP, Kalloger SE, et al (2002) Development and validation of human airway analysis algorithm using multidetector row CT. Proceedings of SPIE 4683:460–469

  16. Nakano Y, Muro S, Sakai H, et al (2000) Computed tomographic measurements of airway dimensions and emphysema in smokers. Correlation with lung function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162(3 Pt 1):1102–1108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakano Y, Wong JC, de Jong PA, et al (2005) The prediction of small airway dimensions using computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171:142–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Jong PA, Long FR, Wong JC, et al (2006) Computed tomographic estimation of lung dimensions throughout the growth period. Eur Respir J 27:261–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Coxson HO, Mayo JR, Behzad H, et al (1995) Measurement of lung expansion with computed tomography and comparison with quantitative histology. J Appl Physiol 79:1525–1530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Coxson HO, Rogers RM, Whittall KP, et al (1999) A quantification of the lung surface area in emphysema using computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:851–856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Castile RG, Iram D, McCoy KS (2004) Gas trapping in normal infants and in infants with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 37:461–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Long FR (2005) Imaging evolution of airway disorders in children. Radiol Clin North Am 43:371–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to express their thanks to Robert Short and Lisa Stout for assistance with the CT scanning and Harvey Coxson and Ahn-Tuan Tran of the Vancouver General Hospital (Vancouver, BC, Canada) for their invaluable expertise with quantitative CT analysis and help with measuring airway–artery pairs. The authors are also indebted to Gary Phillips of the Biostatistical Department of Ohio State University who performed the statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick R. Long.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Jong, P.A., Long, F.R. & Nakano, Y. Computed tomography dose and variability of airway dimension measurements: how low can we go?. Pediatr Radiol 36, 1043–1047 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0264-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0264-5

Keywords

Navigation