Table 2– Associations of titrated oxygen requirement (TOR) with survival time
TOR L·min−1HR per 1-L·min−1 increase in TOR
01–23–68–15#ptrendHR (95% CI)p-value
Derivation cohort
 Unadjusted HR (95% CI)Ref.3.7 (1.1–13)5.3 (1.6–18)7.5 (2.1–27)0.0031.14 (1.06–1.24)<0.001
 Adjusted HR (95% CI)
  Model 1Ref.1.8 (0.5–6.9)3.1 (0.8–11)6.7 (1.7–26)0.0041.16 (1.06–1.27)0.001
  Model 2Ref.1.9 (0.5–7.3)3.0 (0.8–11)6.7 (1.7–25)0.0051.16 (1.06–1.27)0.001
Validation cohort+
 Unadjusted HR (95% CI)Ref.2.2 (0.7–7.2)1.2 (0.4–3.3)7.7 (2.7–22)<0.0011.13 (1.06–1.20)<0.001
 Adjusted HR (95% CI)
  Model 1Ref.1.4 (0.4–5.4)0.7 (0.2–2.4)3.8 (1.01–15)0.011.10 (1.01–1.19)0.02
  Model 2Ref.1.4 (0.4–5.3)0.7 (0.2–2.3)3.9 (1.05–15)0.011.10 (1.01–1.18)0.02
  • Model 1 was adjusted for age, 6-min walk distance and oxygen saturation at the end of the 6-min walk test. Model 2 is model 1 plus adjustment for forced vital capacity % predicted. HR: hazard ratio; ptrend: p-value for trend; ref.: reference group. #: two participants in the validation cohort who were titrated to 25 L·min−1 via non-rebreather mask were included in this group; : n=104; +: n=151.