Table 7– Concordance probability estimates (CPEs)
CPE (95% CI)
RECPAM classifications
 All patients
  Albain et al. [5]0.63 (0.61–0.65)
  Sagman et al. [6]0.62 (0.61–0.65)
  Paesmans et al. [4]0.62 (0.60–0.64)
  Sculier et al. [2]0.63 (0.61–0.65)
 Patients with extensive disease
  Albain et al. [5]0.58 (0.55–0.60)
  Sagman et al. [6]0.55 (0.53–0.57)
  Paesmans et al. [4]0.58 (0.55–0.60)
  Sculier et al. [2]0.57 (0.54–0.59)
  Foster et al. [7]0.56 (0.54–0.59)
Cox models
 All patients
  Paesmans et al. [4]0.64 (0.62–0.66)
  Sculier et al. [2]0.65 (0.63–0.67)
 Patients with extensive disease
  Paesmans et al. [4]0.58 (0.55–0.60)
  Sculier et al. [2]0.59 (0.56–0.62)
  Foster et al. [7]0.60 (0.57–0.63)
  • The CPE represents the proportion of patients in whom the predicted and observed survival times are ordered the same way. RECPAM: recursive partitioning and amalgamation.