Table 3– Comparison of pulmonary function testing between the three subsamples
No traumaTraumaPTSDChi-squared/Fp-value
Subjects n85788728
FEV1# L3.45±0.883.17±0.882.84±0.9025.411≤0.001
FVC# L4.04±1.033.76±1.013.38±0.9520.207≤0.001
FEV1/FVC %85.4±6.084.4±6.583.2±9.36.877≤0.001
FEV1+ % pred ECCS109.4±15.5107.7±16.7102.2±19.14.544≤0.011
FVC+ % pred ECCS106.4±14.4104.7±15.4101.7±17.73.525≤0.030
FEV1§ % pred NHANES III102.4±14.2100.9±15.395.4±17.34.775≤0.009
FVC % pred NHANES III94.4±12.592.7±13.189.4±15.25.480≤0.004
Airflow limitation %
 FEV1/FVC ≤70%1.42.710.713.031≤0.001
 ECCS1.12.010.716.422≤0.001
 NHANES III0.91.67.18.491≤0.014
  • Data are presented as mean±sd, unless otherwise stated. PTSD: post-traumatic stress disorder; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; % pred: % predicted; ECCS: European Community for Coal and Steel; NHANES III: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. #: post hoc pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni) indicated that nontraumatised subjects had significantly higher values than the two other groups, which did not differ from each other; : post hoc pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni) indicated that traumatised subjects had significantly lower values than nontraumatised participants but PTSD-positive subjects did not differ from the two other groups; +: post hoc pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni) did not reveal any group differences; §: post hoc pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni) indicated that PTSD-positive subjects had significantly lower predicted values than nontraumatised participants, who did not differ from the traumatised group.