Results of studies that assess the effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound(EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) in bronchopulmonary cancer
First author [ref] | Type of study | Patients/procedures included | Reference/comparison test | Diagnostic performance | P | Adequate sample | Safety | |||
S | Sp | PPV | NPV | |||||||
Lee 18# | Prospective | 91 patients with strongly suspected or histologically confirmed potential NSCLC with lymph nodes accessible to EBUS–TBNA (5–20 mm on CT). Exclusion of M1 disease, inoperable T4 disease, N3 disease with spread to supra-clavicular lymph node, lymph nodes >2 cm or extranodal invasion. | Cytology results in positive cases Surgery (open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery) in patients without mediastinal metastasis. No mediastinoscopy performed | 93.8% | 100% | 100% | 96.9% | 42% | 92% | |
Wallace 19¶ | Prospective | 138 consecutive patients with known or suspected lung cancer on the basis of CT abnormality but no proven extrathoracic metastases Blinded comparison | Pathological confirmation for positive results Surgical sampling by mediastinoscopy or thoracoscopy, open surgical exploration or 6–12 months of follow-up | PET | 28% | 100% | No complications | |||
24% | 90% | |||||||||
CT | ||||||||||
67% | 53% | |||||||||
TBNA | ||||||||||
36% | 100% | 100% | 78% | |||||||
EUS–FNA | ||||||||||
69% | 100% | 100% | 88% | |||||||
EBUS–TBNA | ||||||||||
69% | 100% | 100% | 88% | |||||||
EUS–FNA + EBUS–TBNA | ||||||||||
93% | 100% | 100% | 97% | |||||||
Bauwens 20# | Prospective collection and retrospective assessment | 106 patients with proven lung cancer (staging) or suspected lung cancer on FDG–PET (33 combined PET/CT) | Cytology/histology results in positive cases Surgical staging (30 out of 46), diagnostic procedures or follow-up in negative cases Blind retrospective comparison | EBUS–TBNA (n = 90 patients) | 58% | 94% | Side-effects, notably cough, seldom encountered | |||
93% | 100% | 100% | 91% | |||||||
FDG–PET (n = 41 patients) | ||||||||||
67% | 100% | |||||||||
Vincent 21# | Retrospective | 152 procedures carried out in 152 patients with primary lung masses or/and mediastinal adenopathy | Cytology results in positive cases with or without surgical confirmation Mediastinoscopy, lung resection, CT, FDG–PET or metabolic activity | 99.1% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74.3% | 95.4% | No complications |
Herth 17# | Prospective | 97 patients highly suspicious for NSCLC with CT scans showing lymph nodes <1 cm and negative PET in mediastinum | Surgical results in all patients | 89% | 100% | 100% | 98.9% | 9.2% | ||
Monsó 22# | Prospective | 67 patients with pulmonary neoplasms and mediastinal and/or lobular lymph nodes >5 mm on ultrasound | Cytology | Diagnostic yield 92.5% | 55.2% | 87.8% | No complications | |||
Nakajima 14# | Retrospective | 43 patients with suspected metastasis of lung cancer and lymph nodes ≥5 mm on CT | Cytology or histology results in positive cases Thoracotomy, thoracoscopy or clinical follow-up (≥6 months) | 92% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 53.5% | 95.3% | No complications |
Herth 15# | Prospective | 502 patients with mediastinal or hilar adenopathies (>1 cm; unknown origin or staging of lung cancer, especially exclusion of N3 nodes) | Cytology in positive cases Surgery or clinical follow-up in negative cases | 94% | 100% | 11% | 98.2% | 93.5% | No complications | |
Herth 16# | Prospective | 100 patients with suspected tumour of pulmonary origin evidenced by CT (T1–T4), without enlargement of lymph nodes (measuring <1 cm) or diagnosis of suspected or known NSCLC | Mediastinoscopy (15%) or thoracotomy (85%) with resection of mediastinal nodes in all patients | 92.3% | 100% | 96.3% | 17% | 100% | No complications | |
Yasufuku 13# | Prospective | 102 patients with suspected or anatomopathologically-confirmed lung cancer who were considered candidates for curative thoracic surgery (patients with stage I, II, or clinical minimal IIIa disease). Extensive N2/N3 disease excluded | Thoracotomy performed or diagnosis made from dissection of lymph nodes in potentially operable patients, and follow-up conducted in other patients (N3 or extensive N2 disease). | EBUS–TBNA | 100% | 100% | No major complications | |||
92.3% | 100% | 100% | 97.4% | |||||||
CT | ||||||||||
76.9% | 55.3% | 37% | 87.5% | |||||||
FDG–PET | ||||||||||
80% | 70.1% | 46.5% | 91.5% | |||||||
Yasufuku 12# | Prospective | 108 patients with suspected NSCLC or proven lung cancer and enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (>1 cm) or mediastinal lesions suspected of malignancy detected by CT (N2 or N3) | Positive cytologies regarded as final diagnosis Follow-up of the disease and confirmation by thoracic lymphadenopathy in negative cases | 94.6% | 100% | 100% | 89.5% | 62.9% | 97.2% | No complications |
Rintoul 23# | Prospective | 18 patients with suspected or known lung cancer and detection of nodular enlargement or presence of paratracheal or parabronchial masses on CT | Positive cytologies regarded as final diagnosis Benign results confirmed by surgery (n = 4) or clinical follow-up (n = 1) | 85% | 100% | 100% | 71.4% | 72.2% | 100% | No complications |
Vilmann 24# | Prospective | 33 patients for staging of lung cancer (n = 20) or diagnosis of mediastinal lesions (n = 13) | Thoracotomy (n = 9), clinical follow-up (n = 19) | EBUS–TBNA | 93.9% | 95% | No complications | |||
85% | 100% | 72% | ||||||||
EUS–FNA | ||||||||||
80% | 100% | 66% | ||||||||
Yasufuku 9# | Prospective | 70 patients with hilar and/or mediastinal lymphadenopathies (>1 cm) and with suspected or confirmed lung cancer. | Positive cytologies regarded as final diagnosis In benign results confirmation by thoracotomy or surgery (n = 21) and by clinical follow-up (n = 3) | 95.7% | 100% | 68.5% | 96% | No complications |
S: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; P: prevalence of lymph node malignancy; NSCLC: nonsmall cell lung cancer; CT: computerised tomography; M: metastasis; T: tumour; N: lymph node; PET: positron emission tomography; EUS: transoesophageal ultrasonography; FNA: fine-needle aspiration; FDG: fluorodeoxyglucose. #: patient-based analysis; ¶: lesion-based analysis.