Table 2

Case-control and indirect cohort studies of pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness in prevention of invasive disease

ReferencePopulation studiedCase/controls nStudy designType of infection% Efficacy or effectiveness (95% CI)
38 Patients admitted to a Veterans Administration Centre89/89Case-controlBacteraemia−21 (−221–55)
39 Patients > 55 yrs of age admitted to hospital122/244Case-controlInvasive infection70 (37–86)
19 Patients ≥18 yrs of age admitted to hospital983/983Case-controlInvasive infection
All patients56 (42–67)
Immunocompetent patients61 (47–72)
Immunocomopromized patients21 (−55–60)
Persons aged 65–74 yrs (yr <3)80 (51–92)
Persons aged 65–74 yrs (yr 3–5)71 (30–88)
Persons aged 65–74 yrs (yr >5)58 (−2–83)
Persons aged 75–84 yrs (yr <3)67 (20–87)
Persons aged 75–84 yrs (yr 3–5)53 (15–81)
Persons aged ≥85 yrs (yr <3)46 (−31–78)
20 Patients >5 yrs of age with pneumococcal bacteraemia or meningitis515/2322Indirect cohortBacteraemia and/or meningitis
All patients57 (45–66)
Moderate risk patients49 (23–65)
High risk patients49 (22–67)
Patients aged ≥65 yrs75 (57–85)
40 Patients ≥2 yrs of age with a chronic illness, or ≥65 yrs of age85/152Case-controlBacteraemia81 (34–94)
  • For prevention of infection with serotype included in the vaccine

  • isolation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from a normally sterile site

  • efficacy during the first three after vaccination

  • efficacy during yr 3–5 after vaccination

  • efficacy during yr >5 yrs after vaccination

  • including persons >5 yrs of age with chronic, but not immunocompromizing illnesses, and those aged 65 yrs or more without underlying illness

  • including sickle-cell anaemia, anatomic asplenia, dysgammaglobulinaemia, haematological, and several other immunocompromizing conditions

  • CI: confidence interval