TABLE 1

Main characteristics of the patients at diagnosis (n=35)

CharacteristicsResult
Age at diagnosis years53.1 (28.0–80.6)
Male21 (60.0)
ILD cases per family3 (1–5)
Aero-contaminant exposure
 Ever smoker25 (71.4)
 Fibrogenic exposure11 (31.4)
 Smoking or fibrogenic exposure29 (82.9)
PFTs
 FVC % predicted75 (36–128)
DLCO % predicted61 (28–112)
Computed tomography pattern (n=31)
 Typical or probable UIP25 (80.6)
 Indeterminate or inconsistent with UIP6 (19.3)
Histological pattern (n=10)
 Definite or probable UIP7
 NSIP1
 NSIP + DIP1
 PC1
Multidisciplinary diagnosis
 IPF#20 (57.1)
 RA–ILD4 (11.4)
 IPAF3 (8.6)
 UnF4 (11.4)
 Chronic HP2 (5.7)
 Sarcoidosis1 (2.9)
 PC1 (2.9)

Data are presented as n, n (%) or median (range). ILD: interstitial lung disease; PFT: pulmonary function test; FVC: forced vital capacity; DLCO: diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; UIP: usual interstitial pneumonia; NSIP: nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; DIP: desquamative interstitial pneumonia; PC: pneumoconiosis; IPF: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; IPAF: interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features; UnF: unclassifiable fibrosis; HP: hypersensitivity pneumonitis. #: IPF, or probable IPF or possible IPF diagnosis based on CT scan and histology. Patients with probable UIP on CT scan without histology, but with a working diagnosis of IPF after multidisciplinary discussion, are classified as IPF.