TABLE 1

Characteristics of index patients, contacts and outcome measurements

First author [ref.]CountryStudy period and typeDR/DSMethod of patient selectionIndex patients nAge years mean±sdSex F/M %HIV statusDR pattern n (%)Contacts n (mean)Outcome measures for M. tuberculosis infectionTB infection events n/N (%)Latent TB therapyTB disease events n/N (%)Timing of diagnosisRisk of infection RR (95% CI)#Risk of disease RR (95% CI)#Overall risk of bias
Snider [10]USA1975–1977, cohort (prospective), NR (study period 32 months)DRRecruited from CDC laboratory398NRNRNRINH-resistant: 178 (44.5); SM-resistant: 136 (34.0); INH/SM-resistant: 86 (21.5)Paediatric contacts: 627 (1.6)TST ≥5mm (12 clinics), TST ≥10mm (3 clinics), unknown (2 clinics)DR: 239/601 (39.8)NRDR: 4/601 (0.6 of total, 1.7 of infected)NRDR-non-MDR versus DS: 1.19 (1.03–1.36)DR-non-MDR versus DS: 0.84 (0.24–2.94)High-moderate (selection bias likely, comparability and outcome ascertainment likely)
DSMatched to study patients for age, race, sex and location398NRNRNRFully susceptible778 (2.0)TST ≥5 mm (12 clinics), TST ≥10 mm (3 clinics), unknown (2 clinics)DS: 252/751 (33.6)NRDS: 6/753 (0.8 of total, 2.4 of infected)NR
Barroso [4]Brazil1990–1999, cohort (retrospective), 2 yearsDRBased on the results of DST at medical facilities12639±2537.3/62.778 of 126 tested, all results negativeMDR557 (4.4)NRNRNRMDR: 25/557 (4.5)NRNRMDR versus DS: 0.84 (0.52–1.37)Low-moderate (selection bias likely, comparability and outcome ascertainment likely)
DSMatched to study patients for sex, age, and year of first treatment17641±1437.5/62.597 of 176 tested, all results negativeFully susceptible752 (4.3)NRNRNRDS: 41/752 (5.5)NR
Johnston [8]Canada1990–2008, cohort (retrospective), 123 (IQR 19–239) monthsDRRecruited from national TB registry124NRNRNRINH-mono- resistant (HMR): 96HMR: 249 (3.0)Non-MDR (HMR): 121/249 (49)Non-MDR (HMR): 8/249 (3.0)DR-non-MDR versus DS: 1.53 (1.34 – 1.75)DR-non-MDR versus DS: 1.43 (0.71–2.87)Low-moderate (selection bias likely, comparability and outcome ascertainment likely)
INH/RMP-resistant: 28 (MDR)MDR: 89 (3.0)TST ≥5 mm (3 months to <1 year after source diagnosis)MDR: 42/89 (47)12/89 treatedMDR: 5/89 (6.0), all susceptibleAll diagnosed within 3 months of index patientsMDR versus DS: 1.49 (1.19–1.86)MDR versus DS: 2.5 (1.05–5.93)
DSRecruited from national TB registry2895NRFully susceptible7309 (3.0)TST ≥5 mm (3 months to <1 year after source diagnosis)DS: 2321/7309 (32)NRDS: 168/7472 (2.0)NR
Teixeira [5]Brazil1994–1998, cohort (prospective), NR (study period 54 months)DRRecruited from TB referral centre2639.5±1223/77HIV+: 5 (20%) HIV-: 21 (80%)INH/RMP-resistant: 6 (23); INH/RMP/PZA-resistant: 11 (43); INH/RMP/PZA/SM-resistant: 5 (19) INH/RMP/PZA/SM-resistant: 1 INH/RMP/PZA/EMB-resistant: 1 INH/RMP/SM/
PZA-resistant: 1 INH/RMP/PZA/
ethionamide: 1
157 (6.0)TST ≥10 mmMDR: 59/133 (44), no therapyMDR 6/157 (4.0)3 a median 10 (range 2–34) months after initial evaluation,MDR versus DS: 1.19 (0.92–1.54)MDR versus DS: 0.7 (0.19–2.59)Good (comparability and outcome ascertainment likely)
DSTwo DS index patients were matched to each new MDR-TB patient5238.4±1323/77HIV+: 5 (10%) HIV-: 47 (90%)Fully susceptible251 (5.0)TST ≥10 mmDS: 86/231 (37)NRDS: 11/251 (4.0)Median 10  (range 2–34) months after initial evaluation
Palmero [7]Argentina1998–2000, cohort (retrospective), 3 yearsDRRecruited from TB registry3731.3±9.333/68HIV+: 21 (57%) HIV-: 16 (43%)MDR97 (2.6)TST ≥10 mmMDR: 17/97 (17.5)NRMDR: 2/97 (2.1)NRMDR versus DS: 1.45 (0.87–2.43)MDR versus DS: 0.92 (0.2–4.25)Low-moderate (selection bias likely, comparability and outcome ascertainment likely)
DSRecruited from TB registry10029.6±8.624/76HIV+: 38 (38%) HIV-: 62 (62%)Fully susceptible356 (3.5)TST ≥10 mmDS: 43/356( 12.1)NRDS: 8/356 (2.2%)NR
Grandjean [6]Peru2010–2013, cohort (prospective), DR 1425 person years (mean 494 days)DRRecruited at diagnosis from reference laboratories2133261/39HIV+: 18 (8%) HIV-: 195 (92%)MDR1055 (4.0)NRNR12.5%MDR: 35/1055 (3.3%), 28 DST performed of which 24 MDR and 4 DSDay 1 of follow-up to day 600 of follow-upNRMDR versus DS: 0.71 (0.49–1.03)Good (outcome ascertainment likely)
2010–2013, cohort (prospective), DS 2620 person years (mean 406 days)DSMatched to study patients for age, race, sex and geographic location4873361/39HIV+: 20 (4%) HIV-: 467 (96%)Fully susceptible2362 (4.0)NRNR17.2%DS: 114/2441 (4.8%)Day 1 of follow-up to day 600 of follow-up
Laniado-Laborin [9]Mexico2011–2013, cross-sectional, no follow-upDRRecruited from TB clinic based on culture and DST performed at the clinic33 (20 MDR)NRNRMDR: 96/41 (4.0), paediatric contactsTST ≥5 mm, IGRA ≥0.35 IU·m-1MDR TST-positive: 31/41 (75.6); MDR IGRA-positive: 24/41 (58)Not treatedNRMDR versus DS (TST): 0.91 (0.74–1.11)NRLow-moderate (selection bias likely, comparability and outcome ascertainment likely)
DSRecruited from TB clinic based on culture and DST performed at the clinic37NRNR77 (2.3)TST ≥5 mm, IGRA ≥0.35 IU·m-1DS TST-positive: 64/77 (83); DS IGRA-positive: 32/77 (42)Treated with INH or RMP, unclear proportionNR
Meta-analysisEvents in DR-non-MDR contacts versus DS contacts: 360/850 versus 2573/8060; events in MDR contacts versus DS contacts: 149/360 versus 2514/7973Events in DR-non-MDR contacts versus DS contacts: 12/850 versus 174/8225; events in MDR contacts versus DS contacts: 73/1931 versus 342/11279DR-non-MDR versus DS: 1.33 (1.2–1.46); MDR versus DS: 1.24 (1.08–1.42)DR-non-MDR versus DS: 1.23 (0.67–2.27); MDR versus DS: 0.81 (0.64–1.06)

DR: drug-resistant; DS: drug-susceptible; F: female; M: male; M. tuberculosis: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; TB: tuberculosis; NR: not recorded; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; INH: isonicotinylhydrazide (isoniazid); SM: streptomycin; TST: tuberculin skin test; MDR: multidrug-resistant; DR-non-MDR: other resistance or not specified, not INH/ rifampicin (RMP); DST: drug-susceptibility testing; IQR: interquartile range; HMR: isoniazid mono-resistant; PZA: pyrazinamide; EMB: ethambutol; IGRA: interferon-γ release assay. #: fixed effects meta-analysis; : additional information provided by authors, used in the meta-analysis.