TABLE 1

Overview of Phase-II and Phase-III trials of investigational treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)

Study nameTreatment 1Treatment 2Study designPrimary endpoint(s)Results
IFIGENIA [14]Prednisone + azathioprine + NAC (n=80)Prednisone + azathioprine (n=75)Phase-III, randomisedChange in VC and DLCO from baseline at month 12Significant benefits from triple therapy were demonstrated for both endpoints
Absolute between-group differences for mean change from baseline in VC and DLCO at month 12 were 0.18 L (95% CI: 0.03–0.32; p=0.02) and 0.75 mmol·min−1·kPa−1 (95% CI: 0.27–1.23; p=0.003), respectively
PANTHER-IPF [15]NAC + prednisone + azathioprine (n=77)#Placebo (n=131)Phase-III, randomisedChange in FVC from baseline at week 60The NAC + prednisone + azathioprine arm was terminated due to an increased rate of death and hospitalisation versus a placebo
PANTHER-IPF [16]NAC (n=133)Placebo (n=131)Phase-III, randomisedChange in FVC from baseline at week 60No significant difference was observed between NAC and a placebo for the primary endpoint (mean changes in FVC of −0.18 L and −0.19 L, respectively; p=0.77)
Interferon gamma-1b trial [17]Interferon gamma-1b (n=162)Placebo (n=168)Phase-III, randomisedTime to disease progression (decline in FVC ≥10% of predicted or increase in P(A–a)O2 of ≥5 mmHg at rest) or deathNo significant difference was observed between interferon gamma-1b and a placebo for the primary endpoint (median of 439 and 344 days, respectively; p=0.5)
INSPIRE [18]Interferon gamma-1b (n=551)Placebo (n=275)Phase-III, randomisedSurvivalTrial was terminated when an interim analysis showed no significant difference between interferon gamma-1b and a placebo for the primary endpoint (HR 1.15; 95% CI: 0.77–1.71; p=0.50)
ACE-IPF [19]Warfarin (n=72)Placebo (n=73)Phase-III, randomisedComposite of time to death, hospitalisation (non-bleeding, non-elective), or absolute decline in FVC ≥10% of predictedTrial terminated after mean follow-up of 28 weeks, when interim analysis showed higher mortality with warfarin versus a placebo (14 deaths versus 3 deaths; p=0.005)
BUILD-1 [20]Bosentan (n=74)Placebo (n=84)Phase-III, randomisedChange in 6-MWD from baseline at month 12No significant difference was observed between bosentan and a placebo for the primary endpoint (mean changes of −52 m and −34 m, respectively; p=0.23)
BUILD-3 [21]Bosentan (n=407)Placebo (n=209)Phase-III, randomisedTime to worsening of IPF (decline in FVC ≥10% of predicted and decline in DLCO ≥15% of predicted, or acute exacerbation) or deathNo significant difference was observed between bosentan and a placebo for the primary endpoint (HR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.66–1.10; p=0.21)
MUSIC [22]Macitentan (n=119)Placebo (n=59)Phase-II, randomisedChange in FVC from baseline at month 12No significant difference was observed between macitentan and a placebo for the primary endpoint (median change of −0.20 L in both groups)
ARTEMIS-IPF [23]Ambrisentan (n=329)Placebo (n=163)Phase-III, randomisedTime to disease progression (defined as death, respiratory hospitalisation, or categorical decline in lung function (FVC ≥10% of predicted plus DLCO ≥5% of predicted, or FVC ≥5% of predicted plus DLCO ≥15% of predicted) (event-driven)Trial terminated after interim analysis showed a low likelihood of demonstrating efficacy on the primary endpoint
Etanercept trial [24]Etanercept (n=46)Placebo (n=41)Phase-II, randomisedChanges in FVC (% predicted), DLCO (% predicted), and P(A–a)O2 (at rest) from baseline at week 48No significant differences were observed between etanercept and a placebo for the lung function endpoints
STEP-IPF [25]Sildenafil (n=89)Placebo (n=91)Phase-III, randomised for 12 weeks followed by 12-week open-label extension≥20% increase in 6-MWD at week 12No significant difference was observed between sildenafil and a placebo on the primary endpoint (10% and 7% of patients, respectively; p=0.39)
Imatinib trial [26]Imatinib (n=59)Placebo (n=60)Phase-II, randomised for 96 weeksTime to disease progression (defined as decline in FVC from baseline of >10% of predicted) or deathNo significant difference was observed between imatinib and a placebo on the primary endpoint (HR 1.05; 95% CI: 0.56–1.96; p=0.89)
Simtuzumab trial [27]Simtuzumab (n=272)Placebo (n=272)Phase-II, randomisedProgression-free survival (defined as death or a categorical decline in FVC (% predicted) from baseline, i.e. ≥10% relative decline and ≥5% absolute decline)Trial was terminated when interim analysis showed no significant difference between simtuzumab and a placebo on progression-free survival (HR 1.13; 95% CI: 0.88–1.45; p=0.33)
Pirfenidone trial [28]Pirfenidone (n=72)Placebo (n= 35)Phase-II, randomised, in Japanese patientsChange from baseline in lowest SpO2 during a 6-min steady-state exercise test at month 6Trial terminated when interim analysis showed no significant difference between pirfenidone and a placebo for the primary endpoint at month 6 (increase of 0.64% versus decrease of 0.55%, respectively; p=0.15)
Pirfenidone trial [29]Pirfenidone (n=55-108)+Placebo (n=104)Phase-III, randomised in Japanese patientsOriginal: change from baseline in lowest SpO2 during a 6-min steady-state exercise test at week 52
Revised: change in VC from baseline at week 52
Significant benefits were seen with high-dose pirfenidone versus a placebo for change in VC at week 52 (−0.09 L versus −0.16 L; p=0.0416)
CAPACITY [30]Pirfenidone (n=87–345)§Placebo (n=347)Phase-III, randomised (two trials)Change in FVC (% predicted) from baseline at week 72Significant benefits were observed with pirfenidone (dose: 2403 mg·day−1) versus a placebo for the primary endpoint in CAPACITY-2 (−8.0% versus −12.4%; p=0.001) but not in CAPACITY-1 (−9.0% versus −9.6%, respectively; p=0.50)
ASCEND [31]Pirfenidone (n=278)ƒPlacebo (n=277)Phase-III, randomisedChange in FVC (% predicted) from baseline at week 52Significant benefits were observed for pirfenidone versus a placebo for the primary endpoint (p<0.001)
TOMORROW [32]Nintedanib (n=85–86)##Placebo (n=85)Phase-II, randomisedAnnual rate of decline in FVCReduced FVC decline with nintedanib (150 mg twice daily) versus a placebo (−0.06 L versus −0.19 L; p=0.06 with closed testing procedure; p=0.01 with hierarchical testing procedure)
INPULSIS [33]Nintedanib (n=638)¶¶Placebo (n=423)Phase-III, randomised (two trials)Annual rate of decline in FVCSignificant benefits were observed for nintedanib versus a placebo for the primary endpoint in INPULSIS-1 (−114.7 mL versus −239.9 mL; p<0.001) and INPULSIS-2 (−113.6 mL versus −207.3 mL; p<0.001)

NAC: N-acetylcysteine; VC: vital capacity; DLCO: diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FVC: forced vital capacity; HR: hazard ratio; P(A-a)O2: alveolar to arterial oxygen pressure difference; 6-MWD: 6-min walk distance; SpO2: arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry. #: compared with NAC (n=81) and placebo (n=78); : 200–600 mg (three times daily); +: pirfenidone dose: high (n=108), low (n=55); §: pirfenidone dose: 1197 mg·day−1 (n=87), 2403 mg·day−1 (n=345); ƒ: pirfenidone dose: 2403 mg·day−1; ##: nintedanib dose: 50 mg once daily (n=86), 50 mg twice daily (n=86), 100 mg twice daily (n=86), 150 mg twice daily (n=85); ¶¶: nintedanib dose: 150 mg twice daily.