TABLE 1

Overview of cardiopulmonary exercise testing-based studies on ventilatory efficiency in different clinical scenarios in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Clinical contextSubjects nDisease severityMain results
Exercise intolerance
 Palange [13]9FEV1 <50%VEVCO2 slope in walking than cycling
 ODonnell [14]20FEV1=34±3%VE at a given VCO2 in CO2 retainers compared with non-retainers
 Nakamoto [15]10FEV1=27–70%VEVCO2 slope not related to increased muscle ergoreflex activity
 Ofir [16]42FEV1=91±8%VE/VCO2 nadir in mild COPD with chronic dyspnoea
 Ora [17]36FEV1=49±10%VE/VCO2 nadir in obese patients with COPD
 Paoletti [18]16FEV1=54±18%VEVCO2 slope in more extensive emphysema
 Guenette [19]64FEV1=86±11%No sex effect on VE/VCO2 nadir
 Caviedes [20]35FEV1=59±22%VE/VCO2 nadir associated with lower maximal exercise capacity
 Chin [21]40FEV1=87±11%VE/VCO2 with added external dead space in mild COPD
 Teopompi [22]56FEV1=26–80%VEVCO2 intercept related to greater dynamic hyperinflation
VEVCO2 slope associated with lower maximal exercise capacity
 Guenette [23]32FEV1=93±9%VE/VCO2 throughout incremental exercise in mild COPD
 Ciavaglia [24]12FEV1=60±13%No effect of exercise modality on VE/VCO2 in obese patients with COPD
 Barron [25]24FEV1=60±13%VE/VCO2 nadir showed excellent test–retest reliability superior to VEVCO2 slope
VE/VCO2 nadir showed better test–retest reliability in COPD than heart failure
 ODonnell [26]208GOLD 1 and 2VE/VCO2 throughout incremental treadmill tests in GOLD 1 and 2
 Neder [27]276GOLD 1 to 4VEVCO2 slope associated with ventilation inhomogeneity in GOLD 1 and 2
 Elbehairy [28]40FEV1=91±10%VE/VCO2 nadir in GOLD grade 1B with and without chronic bronchitis
 Neder [29]316GOLD 1 to 4VEVCO2 intercept from GOLD 1 to 4 associated with exertional dyspnoea
VEVCO2 slope in GOLD 1 and 2 but lower slopes in GOLD 3 and 4
 Elbehairy [30]22FEV1=94±10%VE/VCO2 associated with greater VD/VT in symptomatic GOLD 1
 Faisal [31]48FEV1=63±22%VE/VCO2 in COPD and ILD presenting with similar resting inspiratory capacity
 Crisafulli [32]51FEV1=55±16%VE/VCO2 slope associated with emphysema extension on chest CT
 Elbehairy [33]20FEV1=101±13%Similar VE/VCO2 in smokers without COPD and healthy controls
 Soumagne [34]20FEV1=−1.02±0.64 z-scoreVE/VCO2 nadir in asymptomatic smokers with airflow obstruction
 Jones [35]19FEV1=82±13%VE/VCO2 nadir associated with emphysema extension and lower transfer factor
Influence of co-morbidities
 Holverda [36]25NAVE/VCO2 nadir associated with mean pulmonary artery pressure
 Vonbank [37]42FEV1=1.1±0.5 L↑ Rest and peak VE/VCO2 in patients with associated PAH
 Boerrigter [38]47FEV1=55±17%Pronounced ↑ VEVCO2 slope in a sub-group (n=9) with severe PAH
 Thirapataratong [39]48FEV1=31±10%No effect of β-blockers on VE/VCO2 nadir
 Thirapataratong [40]98FEV1=20±7%No association of peak VE/VCO2 with PAH in severe to very severe COPD
 Teopompi [41]46FEV1=52±16%VEVCO2 slope in COPD compared with heart failure in patients with poorer exercise capacity
VEVCO2 intercept in COPD compared with heart failure
 Thirapataratong [42]108FEV1=26±14%VE/VCO2 nadir in COPD patients with coexistent coronary artery disease
 Apostolo [43]95FEV1=53±13%VEVCO2 intercept in COPD and COPD- heart failure compared with heart failure
 Arbex [44]98FEV1=55±17%VEVCO2 slope and VE/VCO2 nadir in COPD- heart failure compared with COPD
VEVCO2 intercept in COPD- heart failure compared with COPD
 Rocha [45]68FEV1=60±18%VEVCO2 slope in COPD- heart failure with exercise oscillatory ventilation
Risk assessment/prognosis
 Torchio [46]145FEV1=73±16%VEVCO2 slope ≥34 predicted mortality after lung resection surgery
 Brunelli [47]225FEV1=81±18%VEVCO2 slope ≥35 predicted poor outcome after lung resection surgery
 Shafiek [48]55FEV1=60±17%VEVCO2 slope >35 predicted poor outcome after lung resection surgery
 Neder [49]288FEV1=18–148%VE/VCO2 nadir >34 added to resting hyperinflation to predict mortality
 Alencar [50]30FEV1=57±17%VE/VCO2 nadir >34 and right ventricular function predicted mortality in COPD–heart failure
Effects of interventions
 Orens [51]5FEV1=57±4%Single lung transplant decreased VE/VCO2 peak
 Somfay [52]10FEV1=31±10%Decrements in VE with hyperoxia correlated with decreases in VCO2
 ODonnell [53]11FEV1=31±3%Proportional decrements VE and VCO2 with hyperoxia in advanced COPD
 ODonnell [54]23FEV1=42±3%Salmeterol proportionally increased VE and VCO2 during constant work rate exercise
 Palange [55]12FEV1 <50% predHeliox increased VE/VCO2 during constant work rate exercise
 ODonnell [56]187FEV1=44±13%VE (due to higher VT) at a given VCO2 with tiotropium compared with placebo
 Porszasz [57]24FEV1=36±8%Exercise training proportionally reduced VE and VCO2 during constant work rate exercise
 Bobbio [58]11FEV1=53±20%Lobectomy increased VEVCO2 slope
 Eves [59]10FEV1=47±17%Normoxic heliox increased VE/VCO2 more than hyperoxic heliox
 Chiappa [60]12FEV1=45±13%Heliox increased VE/VCO2 during constant work rate exercise
 Habedank [61]8NABilateral lung transplant decreased VEVCO2 slope
 Gagnon [62]8FEV1=67±8%Spinal anaesthesia reduced VE/VCO2 during constant work rate exercise
 Kim [63]1475FEV1 <45%LVRS reduced VE/VCO2 during unloaded exercise
 Guenette [64]15FEV1=86±15%VE/VCO2 at isotime with fluticasone/salmeterol compared with placebo
 Queiroga [65]24FEV1=35±10%Heliox increased VE/VCO2 during constant work rate exercise
 Armstrong [66]55FEV1=26±7%LVRS reduced VE/VCO2 peak and nadir
  • ↑: increased; ↓: decreased; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; VʹE: ventilation; VʹCO2: carbon dioxide output; PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension; GOLD: Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease; ILD: interstitial lung disease; LVRS: lung volume reduction surgery; NA: not available.