TABLE 6

Sensitivity and specificity of the 11 studies directly addressing the PICO question using transmission electron microscopy to diagnose primary ciliary dyskinesia

First author [ref.]Study population nConclusive diagnostic result reached nSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)
Jorissen [37]8124680.71 (0.61–0.81)1.0 (0.99–1.0)
Pifferi [52]64620.75 (0.48–0.93)1.0 (0.93–1.0)
Pifferi [39]59560.77 (0.50–0.93)1.0 (0.91–1.0)
Hirst [53]2311871.0 (0.88–1.0)1.0 (0.98–1.0)
Papon [54]11497930.82 (0.77–0.86)1.0 (0.99–1.0)
Olm [55]24240.92 (0.62–1.0)1.0 (0.74–1.0)
Papon [42]34280.83 (0.52–0.98)1.0 (0.79–1.0)
Shoemark [56]118210310.88 (0.83–0.91)1.0 (1.0–1.0)
Hirst [40]1651220.96 (0.87–1.0)1.0 (0.95–1.0)
Munkholm [57]239610.83 (0.61–0.95)0.92 (0.79–0.98)
Jackson [26]8683680.79 (0.68–0.88)1.0 (0.99–1.0)