TABLE 1

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools used in studies of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)

PRO tool [ref.]TypeItemsDomainsScoringMID#ValidationCorrelationsRecall period
MOS/Rand 36-item Short Form (SF-36) [26]Generic36Physical functioning
Role physical
Bodily pain
General health
Vitality
Social functioning
Role emotional
Mental health
0–100 where 50 is equal to the population normIn patients with PAH:
Physical functioning=13
Role physical=25
Social functioning=21
Vitality=15 [27]
Validated by the IQOLA project in 15 countries6MWD, NYHA FC, haemodynamics4 weeks
MOS 12-item Short Form (SF-12) [28]Generic12Physical functioning
Role physical
Bodily pain
General health
Vitality
Social functioning
Role emotional
Mental health
0–100 where 50 is equal to the population normIn patients with COPD:
Physical component score 3=units,
mental component score=3.5 units [29]
Validated by the IQOLA project in nine countriesCorresponding scores in the SF-364 weeks
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)/EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) [30]Generic5Mobility
Self-care
Usual activities
Pain/discomfort
Anxiety/depression
−0.59–1.00, where 1.00=full health
VAS from 0 (worst possible health) to 100 (best possible health)
Utility=0.074 [31]
VAS=7–12 [32]
Validated in six countries in eight patient groups with chronic conditions (cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, depression, diabetes, liver disease, personality disorders, arthritis, and stroke) and a student cohort6MWD, NYHA FC, haemodynamicsDay of data collection
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) [33, 34]Heart failure-specific21Physical
Socioeconomic
Emotional/psychological
Total 0–105
Physical 0–40
Emotional 0–25
Higher scores indicate worse HRQoL
Total score=5–7 points [35]Validated by the International Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes DatabaseSF-36, 6MWD and NYHA FC4 weeks
Living with Pulmonary Hypertension (LPH) [36]PH-specific21Physical
Emotional
Total 0–105
Physical 0–40
Emotional 0–25
Higher scores indicate worsening HRQoL
Total score=7 points
Subscales=3 points
Validated in patients with PAH using blinded data from a double-blind phase III clinical trialThe physical dimension correlates with Borg dyspnoea score1 week
Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) [37–40]PH-specific65Symptoms
Functioning
QoL
Symptoms 0–25
Functioning 0–30
QoL 0–25
Higher scores indicate worsening HRQoL
Not available
However, the CAMPHOR Utility Index, a tool derived from CAMPHOR to enable cost utility analyses has a MID of 0.09
Validated in patients with PAH, CTEPH and PH associated with connective tissue disease and heart failure
Developed from interviews with patients with PH
Validated in the UK, USA, Austria, Sweden, France, Germany, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand and Canada
EQ-5D, SF-36, 6MWDAt the moment
Mahler dyspnoea index [41, 42]Respiratory disease3Dyspnoea
Magnitude of task
Magnitude of effort
Baseline dyspnoea index: 5 grades per domain, 4 (no impairment) to 0 (very severe impairment)
Transitional dyspnoea index: 6 grades per domain, −3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)
1 unitValidated in PAH, CTEPH, COPD and interstitial lung diseaseDyspnoea diary score; symptom and activity domains of SGRQDuring the past 2 weeks
Borg CR10 dyspnoea score [43, 44]Respiratory disease1Dyspnoea12-unit scale from 0 (nothing at all) to 10 (maximal) or 10 plus maximal1 unitValidated in PAH, CTEPH, heart failure, COPD and other respiratory diseasesThe physical dimension of the LPH questionnaireThe past 24 h
  • MOS: Medical Outcomes Study; MID: minimally important difference; PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension; IQOLA: International Quality of Life Assessment; 6MWD: 6-min walking distance; NYHA: New York Heart Association; FC: functional class; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HRQoL: health-related quality of life; PH: pulmonary hypertension; QoL: quality of life; SGRQ: St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. #: MID is the smallest change or improvement that would justify an alteration in a patient's management and/or indicate a clinically significant improvement.