TABLE 7

Screening strategies in 22 low-incidence countries that responded to survey in 2014

CountryHousehold contact investigationImmigrant screeningEthnic minority or indigenous population screeningScreening of people living with HIV/AIDSPrison screeningScreening of healthcare workers
PolicyTB cases detected with this strategy %PolicyTB cases detected with this strategy %PolicyTB cases detected with this strategy %PolicyTB cases detected with this strategy %PolicyTB cases detected with this strategy %PolicyTB cases detected with this strategy %
AustraliaYesNAYes0.0NoNAYesNANoNANoNA
AustriaYesNAYesNANoNANoNAYesNAYesNA
BelgiumYes5.3YesNANANANoNAYesNAYesNA
CanadaYesNAYes4.5NoNANoNAYesNANoNA
CubaYes2.0YesNANoNAYes3.5NANAYesNA
CyprusYesNAYesNANoNAYes1.4NoNAYes0.0
Czech Rep.Yes4.6NoNANoNAYesNAYesNANoNA
DenmarkYesNAYesNANoNAYesNANoNANoNA
FinlandYesNAYesNANoNANoNAYesNANoNA
FranceYes6.0Yes6.0NoNAYesNAYes1.1YesNA
GermanyYes6.8Yes17NoNANoNAYes14YesNA
GreeceNANANoNANANANANANANANANA
IrelandYes6.1Yes0.3NoNAYes28Yes0.8Yes4.0
IsraelYesNAYesNANoNAYesNANoNAYesNA
MaltaYes2.4Yes45NoNAYesNANo0.0YesNA
NetherlandsYes7.0Yes6.0NoNAYesNAYes1.8Yes0.2
NorwayYes2.0Yes17NoNAYesNAYesNANo0.0
SlovakiaYes7.8Yes0.0Yes6.7Yes0.0Yes6.4Yes0.3
SloveniaYes7.0NoNANoNANo1.0NoNANo0.7
SwedenYesNAYesNANoNANoNAYesNANoNA
SwitzerlandYesNAYes3.0NoNAYesNANoNANoNA
USAYes4.0Yes1.9NoNAYesNAYesNAYes0.4
  • Data concern national levels. Based on the roles and responsibilities for the organisation and delivery of health services, country-level responses need to be interpreted with caution, especially for countries with a federal system of government. TB: tuberculosis; NA: not available or no answer.