Table 2– Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with compromised sublobar resection
First author [ref.]Study designPatients nStageTumour size cmFollow-up monthsMode of sublobar resectionMortality %Intraoperative mediastinal lymph node evaluation %Overall 5-year survival %Local recurrence %
Donahue [47]Retrospective113Any (IA: n=63)Mean: 2.1Median: 24Segmentectomy0100IA: 79IA: 12.7
Schuchert [48]Retrospective325IA (T1a)Not reportedMean: 31.8Segmentectomy1.110077#5.2
El-Sherif [49]Retrospective207IMedian: 1.8Median: 31Segmentectomy: n=85 Wedge resection: n=1221.457407.2
Wolf [50]Retrospective154IA (T1a)Not reportedNot reportedSegmentectomy: n=24 Wedge resection: n=1300.6295916
Landreneau [51]RetrospectiveOpen: 42 VATS: 60IAOpen wedge resection: median 1.7 VATS: median 1.9Open wedge resection: median 29 VATS: median 24Wedge resection00Open wedge resection: 58 VATS: 65Open wedge resection: 24 VATS: 16
Sienel [52]Retrospective87IA1.945Segmentectomy: n=56 Wedge resection: n=310100Segmentectomy: 71
Wedge: 48
Segmentectomy: 16% Wedge: 55%
  • VATS: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. #: free from recurrence; : cancer-related 5-year survival.