PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Paul Jones AU - Lukasz Adamek AU - Gilbert Nadeau AU - Norbert Banik TI - Comparison of quality of life scores with modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale using data from the European health-related quality of life study DP - 2012 Sep 01 TA - European Respiratory Journal PG - P3219 VI - 40 IP - Suppl 56 4099 - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/40/Suppl_56/P3219.short 4100 - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/40/Suppl_56/P3219.full SO - Eur Respir J2012 Sep 01; 40 AB - The 2011 Global Initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend a combined assessment for measuring the impact of COPD which considers current symptoms and future exacerbation risk. Two symptom cut-points are proposed using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score ≥10 and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea score ≥2. There are currently no published data comparing CAT scores by different mMRC grades.This analysis examined health status scores for CAT, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and short form health survey (SF-12) Physical Component (PC) split by mMRC grade in a primary care population using data from the Health-Related Quality of Life in European COPD Study.Data from 1817 patients (mean [SD] FEV1 1.6 [0.6] L; age 64.9 [9.6] years; males 72%) were used. The CAT, SGRQ and SF-12 PC scores are tabulated.The mMRC showed a clear relationship with scores from the comprehensive generic and disease-specific measures. mMRC Grade 1 was associated with very significant levels of health status impairment. Even the patients with mMRC Grade 0 had modestly elevated CAT and SGRQ scores, which means that mMRC Grade 0 does not mean the absence of symptoms.