RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessment of operability by means of CTPA and perfusion SPECT in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
JF European Respiratory Journal
JO Eur Respir J
FD European Respiratory Society
SP p1529
VO 38
IS Suppl 55
A1 Aleksandar Grgic
A1 Florian Miodek
A1 Christian Frantz
A1 Arno Buecker
A1 Fadi Khreish
A1 Michael Boehm
A1 Hans-Joachim Schaefers
A1 Robert Bals
A1 Carl-Martin Kirsch
A1 Heinrike Wilkens
YR 2011
UL http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/38/Suppl_55/p1529.abstract
AB Objective: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is curable with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). The criteria for identification of PEA-amenable patients need to be standardized.The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of rigidly registered CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and perfusion SPECT in differentiating between operable and non-operable patients.Methods: 49 patients with CTEPH (21 men, 58±13 years) were evaluated for PEA by interdisciplinary board using available diagnostic information and served as the gold standard.SPECT was evaluated by a lobe based visually assessed perfusion score ranging from 0 [no perfusion] to 1 [normal perfusion]),after which the percentage of vascular obstruction (PVO) was calculated: PVO = [1 – Perfusion score] × 100. By CTPA, the vascular obstruction index (OI) of central, peripheral, and global PA bed and diameters of large vessels(pulmonary artery (PA), aorta (Ao) and PA/Ao) was determined. In angiography PA pressure (PAP), PA resistance (PVR) and wedge pressure (PCm) were determined. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed.Results: Mean PAP, PVR and PCm was 48±11 mmHg, 878±461dynes sec cm-5, and 11±5 mmHg. 30 patients were chosen as candidates for PEA. Hemodynamic values were not able to differentiate between operable and non-operable patients. PVO and central OI separated PEA-amenable patients (both p<0.001) resulting in the area under the curve of 0.845 (sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 83%) and 0.805 (sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 84%).Conclusion: An accurate interpretation of rigidly registered CTPA and perfusion SPECT may contribute to stratification of operability in patients with CTEPH.