PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Diamant, Z AU - Timmers, MC AU - van der Veen, H AU - Booms, P AU - Sont, JK AU - Sterk, PJ TI - Effect of an inhaled neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, thiorphan, on airway responsiveness to leukotriene D4 in normal and asthmatic subjects AID - 10.1183/09031936.94.07030459 DP - 1994 Mar 01 TA - European Respiratory Journal PG - 459--466 VI - 7 IP - 3 4099 - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/459.short 4100 - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/459.full SO - Eur Respir J1994 Mar 01; 7 AB - Cysteinyl leukotrienes are potent inflammatory mediators that are considered to play a role in the pathophysiology of asthma. It can be postulated that leukotrienes exert their bronchoconstricting effects, in part, through secondary release of endogenous neuropeptides. We examined the effect of inhaled thiorphan, an inhibitor of a neuropeptide degrading enzyme, on the concentration-response curve to leukotriene D4 (LTD4) in a two-period, double-blind, cross-over and placebo-controlled study, in 16 nonasthmatic and 12 asthmatic subjects. Thiorphan or placebo were aerosolized and administered in two 0.5 ml doses of 1.25 mg.ml-1 each, 10 min prior to LTD4 inhalation. The airway response was measured by forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and partial expiratory flow-volume curves (expiratory flow at 40% of forced vital capacity; V40p), and expressed as % fall from baseline. Complete concentration-response curves to inhaled LTD4 were recorded and characterized by their position (provocative concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV1 and a 40% fall in V40p; PC20FEV1 and PC40 V40p) and, in the nonasthmatics, also by the maximal-response plateau (MFEV1, MV40p). Post-pretreatment baseline values of FEV1 and V40p were not different between thiorphan and placebo pretreatment. In both groups of subjects, there was no significant difference in lnPC40V40p or lnPC20FEV1 to LTD4 between the two pretreatments mean difference +/- SD (in doubling concentrations): 0.12 +/- 0.73 and -0.19 +/- 1.23, respectively, in asthmatics; and 0.17 +/- 0.95 and -0.99 +/- 1.95, respectively, in nonasthmatics. The maximal-response plateau could not be obtained in the majority of the asthmatic subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)