PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - G Fuglsang
AU  - B Hertz
AU  - EB Holm
TI  - No protection by oral terbutaline against exercise-induced asthma in children: a dose-response study
AID  - 10.1183/09031936.93.06040527
DP  - 1993 Apr 01
TA  - European Respiratory Journal
PG  - 527--530
VI  - 6
IP  - 4
4099  - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/6/4/527.short
4100  - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/6/4/527.full
SO  - Eur Respir J1993 Apr 01; 6
AB  - We wanted to assess the protective effects on exercise-induced asthma as well as the clinical efficacy and safety of increasing doses of a new sustained-release formulation of terbutaline sulphate, in 17 asthmatic children aged 6-12 yrs (mean 9 yrs). Placebo, 2, 4 and 6 mg terbutaline were given b.i.d. for 14 days, in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design. At the end of each two week period, an exercise test was performed and plasma terbutaline was measured. Compared with placebo, no significant effect was seen on asthma symptoms monitored at home, or on exercise-induced asthma. The percentage falls in FEV1 after the exercise test were 36, 35, 27 and 28%, after placebo, 4, 8 and 12 mg terbutaline.day-1, respectively. There was no correlation between plasma terbutaline and dose of terbutaline. A small but statistically significant dose-related increase in morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) recordings occurred, but the incidence of side-effects also increased with the dose given. There was a trend towards more side-effects when the high doses were used, and two patients withdrew from the study because of side-effects at this dose. It is concluded that continuous treatment, even with high doses of oral terbutaline, does not offer clinically useful protection against exercise-induced asthma.