TY - JOUR T1 - Quality control of <em>D</em><sub>L,CO</sub> instruments in global clinical trials JF - European Respiratory Journal JO - Eur Respir J SP - 828 LP - 834 DO - 10.1183/09031936.00091208 VL - 33 IS - 4 AU - R. Jensen AU - M. Leyk AU - R. Crapo AU - D. Muchmore AU - P. Y. Berclaz Y1 - 2009/04/01 UR - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/33/4/828.abstract N2 - High inter- and intra-laboratory variability exists for the single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL,CO) test. To detect small changes in diffusing capacity in multicentre clinical trials, accurate measurements are essential. The present study assessed whether regular DL,CO simulator testing maintained or improved instrument accuracy and reduced variability in multicentre trials. The 125 pulmonary function testing laboratories that participated in clinical trials for AIR® Inhaled Insulin validated and monitored the accuracy of their DL,CO measuring devices using a DL,CO simulator, which creates known target values for any device. Devices measuring a simulated DL,CO different from target by &gt;3 mL·min-1·mmHg−1 failed testing and were serviced. Device accuracy was assessed over time and with respect to differences in several variables.&lt;/emph&gt; Initially, 31 (25%) laboratories had a DL,CO device that failed simulator testing. After fixing or replacing devices, 124 (99%) laboratories had passing devices. The percentage of failed tests significantly decreased over time. Differences in geographical region, device type, breath-hold time, temperature and pressure were not associated with meaningful differences in DL,CO device accuracy. Regular diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide simulator testing allows pulmonary function testing laboratories to maintain the accuracy of their diffusing capacity measurements, leading to reduced variability across laboratories in multicentre clinical trials. ER -