PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Bruna Rubbo AU - Laura Behan AU - Corine Driessens AU - Rodrigo Athanazio AU - Antony Terance Benjamin AU - Veerappan Ramamoorthi Ram Ganesh AU - Johnny Goodwin AU - Bulent Karadag AU - Panayiotis Kouis AU - Ana Reula Martin AU - Kim Nielsen AU - Mary Anne Olm AU - Heymut Omran AU - Jean-Francois Papon AU - Andreia Pinto AU - Nisreen Rumman AU - Deborah Snijders AU - Zorica Zivkovic AU - Camille Parsons AU - Claudia E. Kuehni AU - Jane S. Lucas TI - Service delivery models for primary ciliary dyskinesia, an international comparison AID - 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.PA3461 DP - 2021 Sep 05 TA - European Respiratory Journal PG - PA3461 VI - 58 IP - suppl 65 4099 - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/58/suppl_65/PA3461.short 4100 - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/58/suppl_65/PA3461.full SO - Eur Respir J2021 Sep 05; 58 AB - Background: Service delivery models vary between and within countries, yet the extent and determinants of different approaches to deliver care for patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) in the last 12 years have not been assessed. This is particularly important in rare diseases due to geographical barriers and need for specialised equipment and personnel.Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach. We conducted interviews with PCD experts between 2016-2018. Transcripts were coded using thematic analysis. Based on themes identified from the interviews, we developed a survey to quantify similarities and differences between models. This was circulated to healthcare professionals involved in care for PCD patients in 2019. Results were compared to a similar survey conducted in 2009.Results: Fifteen PCD experts were interviewed and 56 experts from 31 countries completed the survey (88% response rate). Availability of diagnostic testing has increased in the last ten years. All centres had either transmission electron microscopy or genetic testing available, the two confirmatory tests according to ERS diagnostic guidelines. However, geographical region and size of PCD centres influenced choice of management strategy, with larger centres prioritising effective and less expensive therapies such as airway clearance, nasal rinsing and hypertonic saline. Prophylactic antibiotics were often prescribed in large centres (69% vs 38% in small centres).Conclusions: The variability of management strategies highlight the need for evidence-based management guidelines for PCD. Our findings can inform the establishment of new centres, improve service in existing centres, and set a wider agenda for rare diseases.FootnotesCite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2021; 58: Suppl. 65, PA3461.This abstract was presented at the 2021 ERS International Congress, in session “Prediction of exacerbations in patients with COPD”.This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).