TY - JOUR T1 - Automated closed-loop <em>versus</em> standard manual oxygen administration after major abdominal or thoracic surgery: an international multicentre randomised controlled study JF - European Respiratory Journal JO - Eur Respir J DO - 10.1183/13993003.00182-2020 VL - 57 IS - 1 SP - 2000182 AU - Erwan L'Her AU - Samir Jaber AU - Daniel Verzilli AU - Christophe Jacob AU - Brigitte Huiban AU - Emmanuel Futier AU - Thomas Kerforne AU - Victoire Pateau AU - Pierre-Alexandre Bouchard AU - Maëlys Consigny AU - François Lellouche Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/57/1/2000182.abstract N2 - Introduction Hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia may occur after surgery, with related complications. This multicentre randomised trial evaluated the impact of automated closed-loop oxygen administration after high-risk abdominal or thoracic surgeries in terms of optimising the oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry time within target range.Methods After extubation, patients with an intermediate to high risk of post-operative pulmonary complications were randomised to “standard” or “automated” closed-loop oxygen administration. The primary outcome was the percentage of time within the oxygenation range, during a 3-day frame. The secondary outcomes were the time with hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia under oxygen.Results Among the 200 patients, time within range was higher in the automated group, both initially (≤3 h; 91.4±13.7% versus 40.2±35.1% of time, difference +51.0% (95% CI −42.8–59.2%); p&lt;0.0001) and during the 3-day period (94.0±11.3% versus 62.1±23.3% of time, difference +31.9% (95% CI 26.3–37.4%); p&lt;0.0001). Periods of hypoxaemia were reduced in the automated group (≤3 days; 32.6±57.8 min (1.2±1.9%) versus 370.5±594.3 min (5.0±11.2%), difference −10.2% (95% CI −13.9–−6.6%); p&lt;0.0001), as well as hyperoxaemia under oxygen (≤3 days; 5.1±10.9 min (4.8±11.2%) versus 177.9±277.2 min (27.0±23.8%), difference −22.0% (95% CI −27.6–−16.4%); p&lt;0.0001). Kaplan–Meier analysis depicted a significant difference in terms of hypoxaemia (p=0.01) and severe hypoxaemia (p=0.0003) occurrence between groups in favour of the automated group. 25 patients experienced hypoxaemia for &gt;10% of the entire monitoring time during the 3 days within the standard group, as compared to the automated group (p&lt;0.0001).Conclusion Automated closed-loop oxygen administration promotes greater time within the oxygenation target, as compared to standard manual administration, thus reducing the occurrence of hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia.Following high-risk surgery, automated closed-loop oxygen administration promotes a higher time within range as compared to standard manual administration https://bit.ly/2ZPHT5Y ER -