Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test might be Helpful For Insight Interpretation of Impaired Pulmonary Function on Recovered COVID-19 Patients
- Yi Gao1,3,
- Ruchong Chen1,3,
- Qian Geng1,
- Xiaoneng Mo2,
- Chen Zhan1,
- Wenhua Jian1,
- Shiyue Li1 and
- Jinping Zheng1
- 1State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 2Department of Respiratory medicine, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China
- 3Contribute equally as joint first authors
- Dr Jinping Zheng. E-mail: jpzhenggy{at}163.com or Dr Shiyue Li. E-mail: lishiyue{at}188.com
Abstract
Besides the impaired lung diffusion capacity, impairment of exercise endurance in recovered patients with COVID-19 should also be concerned
To the Editor,
We are grateful to have the opportunity for an in-depth discussion with Dr Nusair et al. [1]and Dr Chapman et al. [2] who we sincerely appreciate their insightful comments on our study about the impaired pulmonary function in COVID-19 patients [3, 4], which helps to interpret the parameters of abnormal lung diffusion capacity more accurate.
According to the algorithm pointed out by Dr. Chapman [2], the mean VA for total, mild, pneumonia, severe pneumonia patients with COVID-19 in our study were 84.9%, 85.3%, 86.4%, 78.5%, respectively [3]. Recently, another retrospective study by Frija-Masson [5] showed more than half of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia presented abnormal lung function 30 days after symptom onset. Similarly, a rough value VA for total, none/mild, moderate, severe patients with COVID-19 were 85.1%, 87.9%, 80.2%, 78.9%, respectively. If we plotted these data into the curve of DLCO/DLCOTLC and KCO/KCOTLC plotted against volume loss VA/VATLC presented by J. Michael et al. [6], we can see a greater impairment in DLCO and a normal but not increased KCO especially in severe cases, which isn't in parallel with the expected result if a reduction in VA is the sole factor that results in lung diffusion abnormality. Both studies supported the view that loss of alveolar units is not sufficient to cause the observed impairment in DLCO.
DLCO depends on both VA and the KCO. The same DLCO may occur with various combinations of KCO and VA, each suggesting different pathologies. Currently, limited data on pathology showed the diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) was the predominant lung pathology, with various levels of progression and severity and residual interstitial abnormalities [7]. Additionally, pulmonary microangiopathy, fibrin clotting within small capillaries around alveoli, small vessel thrombosis and thickening of alveolar capillaries were also found in different post-mortem studies [8, 9]. From this perspective, it suggested that not only reduced VA, but also residual interstitial abnormalities, pulmonary vascular abnormalities contributed to the abnormal diffuse function in patients with COVID-19. We agree with Dr. Chapman's point that “Use of more specific measures of the alveolar-capillary membrane, such as combined DLCO and DLNO measurements or advanced imaging techniques, are likely required to determine whether interstitial abnormalities or pulmonary vascular abnormalities contribute to reduced DLCO”. Moreover, a combination of dynamic chest CT scans help to assess the status of patients with COVID-19 having abnormal lung function.
In the clinical practice, part of rehabilitated patients with COVID-19 presented various level of exertional dyspnea. Besides the impairment of static pulmonary function tests (PFT), a decreasing capability of oxygen uptake or utilise should be noted. Therefore, we performed the dynamic functional evaluation through cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in 10 rehabilitated patients with COVID-19 (i.e. 3 moderate cases, 2 severe cases, 5 critical ill cases) 1-month post-discharge in our center between January to March 2020.
Our result showed the spirometry was within the normal range in all cases and abnormal DLCO (<80% pred) was only found in 3 cases. However, noteworthy, all cases had reduction of the peak oxygen uptake (PeakVO2) and seven cases displayed decreasing oxygen pulse of predicted (VO2/HR%pred). On the contrary, 8 cases displayed normal ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide at anaerobic threshold (VE/VCO2@AT). This indicated pulmonary dysfunction and gas transfer inefficiency was not the sole reason for exercise limitation of patients with COVID-19, extrapulmonary factors especially the cardiac dysfunction after long-term bed rest during hospitalisation should be concerned.
Up to date, no data regarding the CPET on patients with COVID-19 was reported. Previous study on SARS by Ong et al. [10] showed despite half of the recovered patients with SARS had pulmonary function defects, the impairment was mild in majority of cases. Many patients had decreased exercise capacity that cannot be accounted for impairment of pulmonary function, which was consistent with our preliminary results. Thus, it is necessary to further evaluate the impairment of exercise endurance in patients with COVID-19.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: Dr. Gao has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Chen has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Geng has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Mo has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Zhan has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Jian has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Li has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Zheng has nothing to disclose.
- Received November 19, 2020.
- Accepted November 24, 2020.
- Copyright ©ERS 2020.
This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.