Abstract
Objectives Combined assessment of cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and lung cancer (LC) may improve the effectiveness of LC screening in smokers. The aims were to derive and assess risk models for predicting LC incidence, CVD mortality, and COPD mortality by combining quantitative CT measures from each disease, and to quantify the added predictive benefit of self-reported patient characteristics given the availability of a CT scan.
Methods A survey model (patient characteristics only), CT model (CT information only), and final model (all variables) were derived for each outcome using parsimonious Cox regression on a sample from the National Lung Screening Trial (n=15 000). Validation was performed using Multicentric Italian Lung Detection data (n=2287). Time-dependent measures of model discrimination and calibration are reported.
Results Age, mean lung density, emphysema score, bronchial wall thickness, and aorta calcium volume are variables which contributed to all final models. Nodule features were crucial for LC incidence predictions but did not contribute to CVD and COPD mortality prediction. In the derivation cohort, the LC incidence CT model had a 5-year area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 82·5% (95% confidence interval=80·9–84·0%), significantly inferior to that of the final model (84·0%, 82·6–85·5%). However, the addition of patient characteristics did not improve the LC incidence model performance in the validation cohort (CT model=80·1%, 74·2–86·0%; final model=79·9, 73·9–85·8%). Similarly, the final CVD mortality model outperformed the other two models in the derivation cohort (survey model=74·9%, 72·7–77·1%; CT model=76·3%, 74·1–78·5%; final model=79·1%, 77·0–81·2%) but not the validation cohort (survey model=74·8%, 62·2–87·5%; CT model=72·1%, 61·1–83·2%; final model=72·2%, 60·4–84·0%). Combining patient characteristics and CT measures provided the largest increase in accuracy for the COPD mortality final model (92·3%, 90·1–94·5%) compared to either other model individually (survey model=87·5%, 84·3–90·6%; CT model=87·9%, 84·8–91·0%), but no external validation was performed due to a very low event frequency.
Conclusions CT measures of CVD and COPD provides small but reproducible improvements to nodule-based LC risk prediction accuracy from 3 years’ onwards. Self-reported patient characteristics may not be of added predictive value when CT information is available.
Footnotes
This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the European Respiratory Journal. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJ online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Schreuder has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Jacobs reports grants from MeVis Medical Solutions AG, Bremen, Germany, outside the submitted work;.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Lessmann has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Broeders has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Silva has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Išgum has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. de Jong reports other from Philips Healthcare, during the conduct of the study;.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Sverzellati has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Prokop reports personal fees from Bracco, Bayer, Toshiba, & Siemens, grants from Toshiba, other from Thiroux, outside the submitted work;.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Pastorino has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Schaefer-Prokop has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. van Ginneken reports other from Thirona, grants from Mevis Medical Solutions, grants from Delft Imaging Systems, outside the submitted work;.
- Received September 7, 2020.
- Accepted January 18, 2021.
- ©The authors 2021. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org