Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Viable virus aerosol propagation by positive airway pressure (PAP) circuit leak and mitigation with a ventilated patient hood

Shane A. Landry, Jeremy J. Barr, Martin I. MacDonald, Dinesh Subedi, Darren Mansfield, Garun S. Hamilton, Bradley A. Edwards, Simon A. Joosten
European Respiratory Journal 2020; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03666-2020
Shane A. Landry
1Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences & Biomedical Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shane.landry@monash.edu
Jeremy J. Barr
2School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeremy J. Barr
Martin I. MacDonald
3Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dinesh Subedi
2School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darren Mansfield
3Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
4School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
5Monash Partners – Epworth, Victoria, VIC, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Garun S. Hamilton
3Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
4School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
5Monash Partners – Epworth, Victoria, VIC, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bradley A. Edwards
1Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences & Biomedical Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
2School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon A. Joosten
3Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
4School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
5Monash Partners – Epworth, Victoria, VIC, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has been a major feature of the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence suggests patients can auto-emit aerosols containing viable viruses, these aerosols could be further propagated when patients undergo certain treatments including continuous positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. Our aim was to assess i) the degree of viable virus propagated from PAP circuit mask leak, ii) the efficacy of a ventilated plastic canopy to mitigate virus propagation.

Methods Bacteriophage PhiX174 (108 copies·mL−1) was nebulised into a custom PAP circuit. Mask leak was systematically varied at the mask interface. Plates containing Escherichia coli host quantified viable virus (via plaque forming unit) settling on surfaces around the room. The efficacy of a low-cost ventilated headboard created from a tarpaulin hood and a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter was tested.

Results Mask leak was associated with virus contamination in a dose-dependent manner (χ2=58.24, df=4, p<0.001). Moderate mask leak (≥21 L·min−1) was associated with virus counts equivalent to using PAP with a vented mask. The highest frequency of viruses was detected on surfaces 1 m away, however, viable viruses were recorded up to 3.86 m from the source. A plastic hood with HEPA filtration significantly reduced viable viruses on all plates. HEPA exchange rates ≥170 m3·hr−1 eradicated all evidence of virus contamination.

Conclusion Mask leak from PAP may be a major source of environmental contamination and nosocomial spread of infectious respiratory diseases. Subclinical mask leak levels should be treated as an infectious risk. Low-cost patient hoods with HEPA filtration are an effective countermeasure.

Footnotes

This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the European Respiratory Journal. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJ online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Landry has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Barr has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: Dr. MacDonald has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Subedi has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Mansfield has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Hamilton reports non-financial support from Resmed, non-financial support from Philips Respironics, non-financial support from Air Liquide Healthcare, outside the submitted work; .

Conflict of interest: Dr. Edwards reports grants from Monash Partners, grants from Heart Foundation, during the conduct of the study; grants from Apnimed Australia, personal fees from Signifier Medical, outside the submitted work; .

Conflict of interest: Dr. Joosten has nothing to disclose.

  • Received September 29, 2020.
  • Accepted November 24, 2020.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2020
View Full Text

ERS Members

myERS - ERS members : log in with your myERS username and password.

INDIVIDUALS

Log in Login as an individual user.

Forgot your username or password?

LIBRARY USERS

Log in through your institution

If your library has a subscription, you may already be logged in via your IP address. Otherwise you may be able to log in via one of the following routes.
You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
If you think you should have access, please contact your librarian or email journals@ersnet.org

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 57 Issue 1 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 57 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Viable virus aerosol propagation by positive airway pressure (PAP) circuit leak and mitigation with a ventilated patient hood
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Viable virus aerosol propagation by positive airway pressure (PAP) circuit leak and mitigation with a ventilated patient hood
Shane A. Landry, Jeremy J. Barr, Martin I. MacDonald, Dinesh Subedi, Darren Mansfield, Garun S. Hamilton, Bradley A. Edwards, Simon A. Joosten
European Respiratory Journal Jan 2020, 2003666; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03666-2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Viable virus aerosol propagation by positive airway pressure (PAP) circuit leak and mitigation with a ventilated patient hood
Shane A. Landry, Jeremy J. Barr, Martin I. MacDonald, Dinesh Subedi, Darren Mansfield, Garun S. Hamilton, Bradley A. Edwards, Simon A. Joosten
European Respiratory Journal Jan 2020, 2003666; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03666-2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Exercise Training in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Muscle O2 Transport Plasticity
  • Early use of nitazoxanide in mild Covid-19 disease: randomised, placebo-controlled trial
  • Serum and Pulmonary Uric Acid in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Show more Original article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • CME
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society