Abstract
Age significantly determined the clinical features and prognosis of the disease. The prognosis was worse in patients older than 60 years, calling for clinicians to pay more attention to patients on this special age. https://bit.ly/34DTI05
To the Editor:
The rapid outbreak of novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has been a matter of international concern as the disease is spreading fast [1, 2]. Considering that the contagious disease has led to an enormous impact globally, there is an urgent need to identify the risk populations with poor prognosis. Aging is associated with certain changes in pulmonary physiology, pathology and function, during the period of lung infection. Therefore, the age-related differences in responsiveness and tolerance become obvious and lead to the worse clinical outcome in elderly individuals [3]. Previous studies mentioned that older COVID-19 patients are at an increased risk of death [4–7]. However, the ages related clinical characteristics, diseases courses and outcomes other than death in COVID-19 patients remain unclear.
Totally, 221 COVID-19 patients who were diagnosed by the fever clinics of designated hospitals were included in this study. They were administratively admitted to Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center to receive medical care. The diagnosis was based on the positive response to the viral nucleic acid detection according to the updated versions of the guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia issued by the National Health Commission of China [8]. Data on demographics, symptoms, disease severity and course, radiologic and laboratory examination were analysed in our study. A unified observation endpoint date was set (March 7, 2020) in our study, primary outcome of the disease course and second outcome of respiratory failure rate for all COVID-19 patients in both groups were compared.
All 221 COVID-19 patients were divided into two groups when taking 60 years old as the threshold. The age distribution for all patients was shown in figure 1a. 136 cases (61.5%) were under 60 years old (<60), and other cases were over 60 years old (≥60). In total, 176 patients (79.6%) had fever, other common symptoms included cough (48.0%), sputum (25.8%), sore throat (8.6%), and diarrhea (5.4%), among which only sore throat showed a significant difference between two groups (11.8% versus 3.5%, p=0.034). The significant negative correlations between ages of patients and lymphocyte counts (r=−0.432, p<0.001) as well as albumin levels (r=−0.569, p<0.001) were observed in our study (fig. 1b and c). Compared with the young, patients over 60 presented with higher levels of blood urea nitrogen (5.83 versus 4.42, p<0.001), LDH (272.8 versus 249.0, p=0.004) and inflammatory indicators (fig. 1d, all p<0.01), more lobes involved (4.15 versus 3.34; p<0.001) in bilateral lesions (89.4% versus 74.3%, p=0.006) (fig. 1e) and higher proportion of bacteria co-infection (12.9% versus 4.4%, p=0.021). The severity of COVID-19 was milder in those under 60, showing lower proportion of severe and critical patients (fig. 1f). In turn, the utilisation of antibiotic therapy, intravenous corticosteroids, and assisted ventilation were more common in those over 60 (fig. 1g). Longer disease courses and higher proportion of cases with respiratory failure in patients over 60 were observed (fig. 1h). The median time of disease courses was significantly longer in patients over 60 years (24.0 versus 21.5 days, p=0.026) (fig. 1i). Interestingly, this difference was markedly significant in male patients (25.0 versus 21.0 days, p=0.036) but not in female patients (fig. 1i). Big difference of courses was observed in cases with respiratory failure in two ages groups, although it showed no statistical significance (38.0 versus 30.0 days, p=0.100) (fig. 1i).
This is the first study to systematically evaluate the impact of age on the clinical characteristics and important outcomes for COVID-19 patients, thus helping clinicians to establish risk stratification of COVID-19 patients as early as possible. Sporadic studies mentioned that the elderly people may tend to die after infection [5, 7, 9], calling on the public to pay more attention to protecting the elder from the virus. In this study, we demonstrated that the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 221 COVID-19 patients were closely related to the different ages. This study provided clear evidence of relationship between disease severity and the age, which other studies did not refer to. Comprehensive analysis of these indicators provided physicians worldwide with important information for the disease perception, the condition assessment and the effective treatments for COVID-19.
The proportions of patients with the usage of antibiotics were higher in patients ≥60 years than those in patients <60 years, possibly due to the higher proportion of patients with bacteria co-infection in this group. Besides, older patients showed more serious illness, leading to higher frequency of adjuvant therapies including corticosteroids and assisted ventilation in this group of patients. Contrastive analysis with recent reports [10, 11], older patients presented significantly lower level of lymphocyte than young patients. Lymphocytes are generally elevated in response to common viral infections, while abnormally decreased in SARS and COVID-19 [12–14]. Although the underlying mechanism is still unclear, the low level of lymphocyte could be a key indicator of disease severity in COVID-19. Furthermore, other serological indexes, such as albumin level, blood urea nitrogen, lactate dehydrogenase and inflammatory indicators also showed a progressive trend with age. The phenomenon is obvious, however, we cannot identify whether these indicators changed result in or result from the differences of the diseases severity with age.
Although most patients had favorable prognosis in this study, some patients required longer periods of treatment, which might turn worse under the high risk of hospital-acquired or iatrogenic infections. Age was one of the risk factors in disease severity and mortality of viral infections studies [5, 9], while the data about age in those studies are rough. Our study found that COVID-19 patients over 60 years had a higher rate of respiratory failure and needed prolonged treatment than those at age below 60 years, demonstrating that elderly COVID-19 patients were much more severe and showed poorer response to treatments than the younger. The cure rate of patients over 60 years old (89.4%) was relatively lower than that of patients under 60 years old (95.6%), especially in male and those with respiratory failure. Previous study had indicated that there might be a sex predisposition to COVID-19, with men more prone to be affected, but no evidence of an association between the severity of COVID-19 and the male sex [15]. More attention needs to be paid on these old patients with respiratory failure, and aggressive early intervention should be made to improve their prognosis. With more cases being examined from different ethnic and genetic backgrounds, the findings related to the age in this study may be approved by physicians worldwide.
In conclusion, the clinical features and prognosis of the disease vary among patients of different ages and a thorough assessment of age may help clinicians worldwide to establish risk stratification for all COVID-19 patients. Patients over 60 years showed heavier clinical manifestations, greater severity and longer disease courses compared with those under 60 years. Closer monitoring and more medical interventions may be needed for the elder.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express our sincere thanks to all the staff of all the hospitals, and also the patients for their contributions to the study.
Footnotes
Author contributions: Jin-fu Xu and Jie-ming Qu conceived and designed the study. Yang Liu, Bei Mao, Shuo Liang, Hai-wen Lu, Yan-hua Chai and Jin-fu Xu conducted the primary analysis and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. Lan Wang, Li Zhang, Qiu-hong Li, Lan Zhao, Yan He, Xiao-long Gu, Xiao-bin Ji, Li Li, Zhi-jun Jie, Qiang Li, Xiang-yang Li, Hong-zhou Lu, Wen-hong Zhang and Yuan-lin Song reviewed the draft for intellectual content. The corresponding authors Jin-fu Xu and Jie-ming Qu had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Support statement: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars to Jin-fu Xu (81925001), Shanghai Leading Talent Program (number 2016036 to Jin-fu Xu) and the Project of the Shanghai Hospital Development Center (16CR3036A to Jin-fu Xu). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. No authors have been paid to write this article by any pharmaceutical companies or agencies. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.
Conflict of interest: Bei Mao has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Shuo Liang has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Jia-wei Yang has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Hai-wen Lu has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Yan-hua Chai has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Lan Wang has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Li Zhang has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Qiu-hong Li has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Lan Zhao has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Yan He has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Xiao-long Gu has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Xiao-bin Ji has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Li Li has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Zhi-jun Jie has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Qiang Li has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Xiang-yang Li has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Hong-zhou Lu has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Wen-hong Zhang has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Yuan-lin Song has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Jie-ming Qu has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Jin-fu Xu has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Yang Liu has nothing to disclose.
- Received March 20, 2020.
- Accepted April 11, 2020.
- Copyright ©ERS 2020
This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.