Abstract
The diagnosis of pneumonia is challenging. Our objective was to assess whether a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) modified the probability of diagnosing pneumonia in elderly patients.
We prospectively included patients aged over 65 years, with a suspicion of pneumonia treated with antimicrobial therapy. All patients had a chest radiograph and LDCT within 72 h of inclusion. The treating clinician assessed the probability of pneumonia before and after the LDCT by using a Likert scale. An adjudication committee retrospectively rated the probability of pneumonia and was considered as reference for diagnosis. The main outcome was the difference in the clinician's pneumonia probability estimates before and after LDCT and the proportion of modified diagnoses which matched the reference diagnosis (net reclassification improvement (NRI)).
200 patients with a median age of 84 years were included. After LDCT, the estimated probability of pneumonia changed in 90 (45%) patients: 60 (30%) were downgraded, 30 (15%) upgraded. The NRI was 8% (NRI event -6% + NRI non event 14%).
LDCT modified the estimated probability of pneumonia in a substantial proportion of patients. It mostly helped to exclude a diagnosis of pneumonia and hence to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial therapy.
Abstract
Low-dose CT modified the estimated probability of pneumonia in a substantial proportion of elderly patients (45%)
Footnotes
This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the European Respiratory Journal. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJ online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Virginie Prendki has nothing to declare.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Huttner has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Garin has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Herrmann has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest regarding this manuscript
Conflict of interest: Dr. Marti has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Christoph Becker
Conflict of interest: Dr. roux has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: NONE
Conflict of interest: Dr. Agoritsas has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Rosset-Zufferey has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: I disclose non conflict of interest
Conflict of interest: Laurent Kaiser
Conflict of interest: I declare no conflict of interest
Conflict of interest: Dr. Stirnemann has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Serratrice has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Scheffler has nothing to disclose.
This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.
- Copyright ©ERS 2018