Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Pulmonary artery size as a predictor of outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Stephanie Shin, Christopher S. King, Nitin Puri, Oksana A. Shlobin, A. Whitney Brown, Shahzad Ahmad, Nargues A. Weir, Steven D. Nathan
European Respiratory Journal 2016; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01532-2015
Stephanie Shin
1Dept of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher S. King
2Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Dept of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nitin Puri
3Dept of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Dept of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oksana A. Shlobin
2Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Dept of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Whitney Brown
2Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Dept of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shahzad Ahmad
2Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Dept of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nargues A. Weir
2Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Dept of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven D. Nathan
2Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Dept of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: steven.nathan@inova.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

IPF patients have heightened propensity for pulmonary hypertension, which portends a worse outcome. Presence of pulmonary hypertension may be reflected in an enlarged pulmonary artery. We investigated pulmonary artery size measured on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) as an outcome predictor in IPF.

We retrospectively reviewed all IPF patients evaluated at a tertiary-care centre between 2008 and 2013. Pulmonary artery and ascending aorta diameters were measured from chest HRCT with pulmonary artery:ascending aorta diameter (PA:A) ratio calculations. Outcome analysis defined by either death or lung transplant based on pulmonary artery size and PA:A ratio over 60 months was performed. Independent effects of different variables on overall outcomes were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

98 IPF patients with available HRCT scans had a mean pulmonary artery diameter and PA:A ratio of 32.8 mm and 0.94, respectively. Patients with a PA:A ratio >1 had higher risk of death or transplant compared with a PA:A ratio ≤1 (p<0.001). A PA:A ratio >1 was also an independent predictor of outcomes in unadjusted and adjusted outcomes analyses (hazard ratio 3.99, p<0.001 and hazard ratio 3.35, p=0.002, respectively).

A PA:A ratio >1 is associated with worse outcomes in patients with IPF. HRCT PA:A ratio measurement may assist in risk stratification and prognostication of IPF patients.

Abstract

Pulmonary artery measurements on imaging can be utilised for risk stratification and prognostication in IPF http://ow.ly/WNO2h

Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the most common form of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, is a chronic, progressive fibrotic disease that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The clinical course of IPF is generally characterised by progressive deterioration with a median survival of 2.5–4 years [1]. The course of IPF in individual patients is notoriously difficult to predict. Prognostication has typically been based on pulmonary function tests, specifically forced vital capacity (FVC) and single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) [2]. However, other characteristics, including age, gender and body mass index (BMI), may all influence outcomes. Indeed, a composite of variables in the form of the GAP index (based on gender, age and two lung physiology variables (FVC and DLCO)) has gained recognition as a more accurate predictor of outcomes [3]. IPF is a disease that is characterised by a high prevalence of comorbidities, including pulmonary hypertension, coronary artery disease, gastro-oesophageal disease and obstructive sleep apnoea [2, 4]. These comorbidities may also be associated with worse outcomes; of these, pulmonary hypertension has the strongest association with functional impairment and survival [5–7]. Aside from DLCO, which has a weak correlation with pulmonary hypertension, the GAP score does not incorporate elements that capture the impact of complicating pulmonary hypertension.

Given the independent prognostic significance of pulmonary hypertension in IPF, clinical suspicion and early diagnosis would appear to be essential. For example, the development of pulmonary hypertension in patients with IPF might be an indication for listing for lung transplantation as recommended in the most recent international consensus guidelines [8]. The presence of pulmonary hypertension may help risk-stratify patients for clinical trials with the pulmonary hypertension itself being a target of such trials. There are a number of parameters that might suggest the presence of pulmonary hypertension, including “disproportionate” dyspnoea, elevated brain natriuretic peptide and 6-min walk test variables, including short distance walked, increased desaturation and a low pulse rate recovery. The best screening tool for pulmonary hypertension is transthoracic echocardiography; however, it has a greater tendency to be inaccurate in patients with advanced lung disease [9, 10].

An ancillary, noninvasive screening tool would facilitate more accurate risk stratification and allow more judicious use of the gold standard right heart catheterisation (RHC). Evidence of pulmonary hypertension on chest computed tomography (CT) could represent a readily available tool to more accurately predict the presence of pulmonary hypertension. To date, studies on the ability of chest CT to predict pulmonary hypertension have variably included an evaluation of the pulmonary artery diameter, the pulmonary artery:ascending aorta diameter (PA:A) ratio or measurements of segmental vessels. Indeed, the association between pulmonary artery size and prevalent pulmonary hypertension in fibrotic lung disease has yielded mixed results [11–14]. However, the association between pulmonary artery dilation on CT and clinical outcomes in IPF has, to the best of our knowledge, not been assessed, while recent studies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have demonstrated the ability of the ratio of the pulmonary artery to the aorta to predict exacerbations and mortality [15, 16].

In this study, we sought to establish whether an independent relationship exists between pulmonary artery size based on CT measurements and outcomes in IPF patients.

Methods

Study design

Patients with IPF evaluated in an Advanced Lung Disease clinic between August 2008 and 2013 with high-resolution CT (HRCT) scans were identified. The diagnosis of IPF was made based on current standard of care at the time of evaluation and referred at varying stages of disease for management [17, 18]. The HRCT scans were reviewed in a blinded and independent fashion by three of the authors (S.S., C.S.K. and N.P.). The pulmonary artery segment was measured at its bifurcation with the largest ascending aorta diameter measured at the corresponding level with the PA:A ratio calculated from these measurements [16]. The presence of aortic aneurysms was also evaluated with threshold aortic diameters accounting for the effects of age and gender. Specifically, the upper limits of normal were defined as 35.6, 38.3 and 40 mm for females and 37.8, 40.5 and 42.6 mm for males in the age ranges 20–40, 41–60 and >60 years, respectively [19]. When available, pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) measurements from the RHC were also obtained for analysis.

The means of the three independent measurements for the pulmonary artery and the PA:A ratio were used for data analysis. Demographic data collated included age, BMI, gender and pulmonary function tests.

Our primary endpoint was transplant-free survival, which was calculated from the date of the chest CT until either death or transplant, whichever event occurred first. For outcome analyses based on pulmonary function tests, time zero for each patient was calculated from the date of the pulmonary function tests. The study was approved by the Inova Institutional Review Board (IRB15-1955).

Statistics

Continuous data are presented as mean or as median (range), while categorical data are presented as frequencies and percentages. Parametric statistics were utilised for data confirmed to have a normal distribution. The intra-class correlation coefficient was used to determine the level of agreement among the three readers for continuous variables of the pulmonary artery and the PA:A ratio. Comparisons of measurements between groups were performed using unpaired t-tests. Pearson's correlation was utilised for comparison of the pulmonary diameter and PA:A ratio to the mean PAP (mPAP) and FVC. The primary outcome analyses of death or transplant were demonstrated with Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank testing. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to assess the association between PA:A ratio and lung transplant or death. The GAP index was calculated for each patient, and included in the regression model to control for potential confounding factors of age, gender, DLCO % predicted and FVC % predicted [3]. Hazard ratios were attained from the Cox analyses. All calculations were performed utilising SAS software version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and IBM SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

There were 98 IPF patients identified who were evaluated over the 5-year period in whom chest HRCT images were available. The demographics and pulmonary function of the group are shown in table 1. The patients were divided into two groups based on those with a PA:A ratio ≤1 and a PA:A ratio >1. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different with the exception of the FVC % predicted, forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted and DLCO % predicted. The GAP index was higher in those with PA:A ratio >1 (p=0.02).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient characteristics stratified by pulmonary artery:ascending aorta diameter (PA:A) ratio

The mean (range) pulmonary artery and ascending aorta diameters were 32.8 (20.9–45.4) and 35.0 (24.9–47.8) mm, respectively. The mean PA:A ratio was 0.94 with an intra-class correlation coefficient amongst the three readers demonstrating excellent agreement (R=0.79, 95% CI 0.68–0.86, p<0.001). The correlation between FVC % predicted and PA:A ratio demonstrated a negative correlation (r= −0.31, p=0.002). The RHC data were available for 53 patients with a mean CT to RHC time interval of 7.2 months, of which 66% (n=35) of patients had mPAP <25 mmHg. The overall correlation between mPAP and PA:A ratio was 0.35 (online supplementary table S1). The correlation was stronger (r=0.57) for the smaller subset of patients (n=27) with RHC data within 3 months of their chest CT (online supplementary table S2). A similar correlation between mPAP and pulmonary artery diameter size was also noted, with strengthening of this correlation for the subset of patients with a shorter time interval between the two studies (online supplementary table S3).

Table 2 shows the mean ascending aorta and pulmonary artery diameter stratified by PA:A ratio ≤1 and PA:A ratio >1. The mean pulmonary artery diameter for PA:A ratio ≤1 and PA:A ratio >1 was 31.1 and 36.3 mm, respectively. The mean ascending aorta diameter for PA:A ratio ≤1 and PA:A ratio >1 was 35.6 and 33.7 mm, respectively. There were six patients with aortic dilation/aneurysm (n=5 in the PA:A ratio ≤1 group and n=1 for the PA:A ratio >1 group). The mean pulmonary artery diameters for those with aortic dilations/aneurysms were 33.6 and 45 mm for PA:A ratio ≤1 and PA:A ratio >1, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

HRCT measurements stratified by pulmonary artery:ascending aorta (PA:A) diameter ratio

The Kaplan–Meier outcomes analysis of time to death or transplant based on pulmonary artery size and PA:A ratio are demonstrated in figures 1 and 2. Patients above the median pulmonary artery diameter for the cohort (>32.3 mm) had worse outcomes compared with those below the median (figure 1; p=0.03). Those with PA:A ratio >1 also demonstrated worse outcomes compared to those with PA:A ratio ≤1 (figure 2; n=13 lung transplantation and n=18 death, p<0.001). A subgroup Kaplan–Meier outcomes analysis excluding the six patients with aortic dilations/aneurysms was also performed and it demonstrated the same outcome difference (p<0.001).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Transplant-free survival of the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis cohort stratified by median pulmonary artery diameter (PA) ≤32.3 mm (n=51) or >32.3 mm (n=47).

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Transplant-free survival of the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis cohort stratified by pulmonary artery:ascending aorta diameter (PA:A) ratio ≤1 (n= 67) or >1 (n=31).

The unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratio calculations using the Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusting for the GAP index with PA:A ratio >1 are given in table 3. The pulmonary artery diameter was not included in the hazard analysis due to its correlation with PA:A ratio (r=0.62, p<0.001). The analysis showed that a PA:A ratio >1 was a significant independent predictor of worse outcomes in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses (hazard ratio 3.99, 95% CI 1.92–8.28, p<0.001 and hazard ratio 3.35, 95% CI 1.54–7.26, p=0.002, respectively). The GAP index was not statistically significant in either the unadjusted or adjusted analyses.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for lung transplant or death#

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that a PA:A ratio >1 is associated with worse outcomes in patients with IPF. Interestingly, the PA:A ratio >1 appeared to perform better in predicting outcomes than the well-established GAP index in our analysis.

In patients with IPF, accurate prognostication is crucial in determining further medical management, timing of evaluation and listing for lung transplantation, as well as for patient counselling. Currently, the determination of prognosis involves the use of clinical and physiological parameters such as age, gender and pulmonary function tests. Radiologic features that are used to predict outcomes in IPF are limited to the extent of fibrosis. The ability to use the PA:A ratio measurements obtained from readily available HRCT images in patients with IPF provides further important and complimentary prognostication data. The excellent intra-class correlation between our three readers supports that evaluating this ratio is not only easy, but also reliably consistent between readers and therefore readily applicable in the clinical setting.

There are several possible explanations for our observation of worse outcomes with a higher PA:A ratio. The association of the PA:A ratio with pulmonary hypertension has been reported in prior studies of IPF [11]. Specifically, it is well established that pulmonary hypertension is associated with worse outcomes in IPF, which may explain our observations [20]. Furthermore, prior studies have shown an association between PA:A ratio >1 with COPD exacerbations and worsened outcomes [15, 16]. Whether or not the same relationship between exacerbations and pulmonary artery size holds true in IPF requires exploration in future studies. It is also noteworthy that an association between acute exacerbations and pulmonary hypertension has been reported in IPF [21]. Therefore, it is conceivable that some of the worse outcomes observed in our study may have also been due to acute exacerbations of IPF. The relationship between pulmonary artery size and pulmonary hypertension may not solely explain the worsened outcomes noted, and an increase in the PA:A ratio may be due to other reasons that are surrogates of disease severity. Prior studies comparing pulmonary artery size to pulmonary haemodynamics have also produced mixed results. This might suggest that factors other than pulmonary haemodynamics may play roles in the association between pulmonary artery size and outcomes. For example, it is plausible that the pulmonary artery size is affected by radial traction created by progressive fibrosis over time. Indeed, our analysis of pulmonary artery size and the PA:A ratio in relation to the FVC % predicted and total lung capacity % predicted demonstrated a weak negative correlation in our cohort, suggesting that the fibrosis itself may also play a role in pulmonary artery dilation.

An unintended consequence of our study is that we were able to provide an estimate of the prevalence of aortic aneurysms in patients with IPF. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no such reports previously, although it is well established that IPF patients have a greater propensity for cardiovascular events, including thromboembolic disease, coronary artery disease and heart failure [22–24]. The prevalence of aortic aneurysms in our IPF cohort was 6%, which is slightly higher numerically than that of the general population (reported to be 4.6%) [25]. Furthermore, a US-based study reported an overall age- and gender-adjusted incidence of thoracic aortic aneurysm as 10.4 per 100 000 person-years [26]. This suggestion of an increased prevalence of aortic aneurysms among IPF patient requires further investigation in larger epidemiologic cohorts.

The limitations in our study include the variability that exists with capturing the pulmonary artery exactly at the level of bifurcation on the HRCT images. The very good correlation among our three readers, however, suggests that this is not a major issue. The presence of aortic aneurysmal enlargement might also affect the calculation of the ratio. However, only a small minority of our patients had aortic dilation/aneurysm, which may have “normalised” their ratios. We chose to normalise the pulmonary artery size by the use of PA:A ratio only, as there is precedent for this in multiple other clinical trials [16, 27, 28]. In addition, in a prior large cohort study, in which the measurement of pulmonary artery size and PA:A ratio were stratified by various characteristics, including age, gender, height, body surface area and cardiovascular risk factors, only a weak to very weak correlation was demonstrated [29].

We were limited in our assessment of the correlation between pulmonary artery size and haemodynamic variables due to the number of available RHCs and their temporal relationship to HRCT. The available RHC data that was analysed supports a positive correlation between the mPAP and PA:A ratio with a notable stronger relationship with more temporally proximate HRCT studies. The paucity of contemporaneous haemodynamic data does not diminish from the powerful prognostic information imparted, but rather underscores the universal availability and applicability of this simple HRCT measurement. Specifically, we demonstrate that the PA:A ratio is a noninvasive tool that can be utilised as an independent prognostic indicator regardless of the status of concomitant pulmonary hypertension. Our finding of the PA:A ratio performing better than the GAP index should be viewed with some caution and requires further validation in a larger, independent cohort. One difference between our analysis of outcomes and the original GAP description is that ours was a composite of time to death or transplant, while the original description was as a predictor of mortality only.

In conclusion, measurement of the PA:A ratio on HRCT can be easily performed without additional invasive testing. A PA:A ratio >1 appears to be an independent predictor of outcomes in IPF patients. Evaluation of this readily available ratio may facilitate prognostication and counselling of patients with IPF. In addition, it may prove to have a role in stratifying patients within clinical studies as well as prioritisation for lung transplantation. Future studies are encouraged to further evaluate this ratio. Such studies might include correlating the ratio with contemporaneous invasive haemodynamic measurements as well as looking at the significance of change in the pulmonary artery diameter and PA:A ratio over time.

Footnotes

  • This article has supplementary material available from erj.ersjournals.com

  • Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside the online version of this article at erj.ersjournals.com

  • Received September 13, 2015.
  • Accepted December 21, 2015.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2016

References

  1. ↵
    American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. International multidisciplinary consensus classifications of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 277–304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Barlo NP,
    2. van Moorsel CH,
    3. van den Bosch JM, et al.
    Predicting prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2010; 27: 85–95.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Ley B,
    2. Ryerson CJ,
    3. Vittinghoff E, et al.
    A multidimensional index and staging system for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 684–691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Nathan SD,
    2. Basavaraj A,
    3. Reichner C, et al.
    Prevalence and impact of coronary artery disease in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology 2010; 104: 1035–1041.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Rivera-Lebron BN,
    2. Forfia PR,
    3. Kreider M, et al.
    Echocardiographic and hemodynamic predictors of mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2013; 144: 564–570.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. King TE Jr.,
    2. Tooze JA,
    3. Schwarz MI, et al.
    Predicting survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: scoring system and survival model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 1171–1181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Lettieri CJ,
    2. Nathan SD,
    3. Barnett SD, et al.
    Prevalence and outcomes of pulmonary arterial hypertension in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2006; 129: 746–752.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Weill D,
    2. Benden C,
    3. Corris PA, et al.
    A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014 – an update from the Pulmonary Transplantation Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34: 1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Nathan SD,
    2. Shlobin OA,
    3. Barnett SD, et al.
    Right ventricular systolic pressure by echocardiography as a predictor of pulmonary hypertension in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med 2008; 102: 1305–1310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Arcasoy SM,
    2. Christie JD,
    3. Ferrari VA, et al.
    Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patient with advanced lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 735–740.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Devaraj A,
    2. Wells AU,
    3. Meister MG, et al.
    The effect of diffuse pulmonary fibrosis on the reliability of CT signs of pulmonary hypertension. Radiology 2008; 249: 1042–1049.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Zisman DA,
    2. Karlamangla AS,
    3. Ross DJ, et al.
    High-resolution chest CT findings do not predict the presence of pulmonary hypertension in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2007; 132: 773–779.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. McCall RK,
    2. Ravenel JG,
    3. Nietert PJ, et al.
    Relationship of main pulmonary artery diameter to pulmonary arterial pressure in scleroderma patients with and without interstitial fibrosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2014; 38: 163–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Tan RT,
    2. Kuzo R,
    3. Goodman LR, et al.
    Utility of CT scan evaluation for predicting pulmonary hypertension in patients with parenchymal lung disease. Medical College of Wisconsin Lung Transplant Group. Chest 1998; 113: 1250–1256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Shin S,
    2. King CS,
    3. Brown AW, et al.
    Pulmonary artery size as a predictor of pulmonary hypertension and outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2014; 108: 1626–1632.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Wells JM,
    2. Washko GR,
    3. Han MK, et al.
    Pulmonary arterial enlargement and acute exacerbations of COPD. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 913–921.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. International consensus statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 646–664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Raghu G,
    2. Collard HR,
    3. Egan JJ, et al.
    An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183: 788–824.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Mao SS,
    2. Ahmadi N,
    3. Shah B, et al.
    Normal thoracic aorta diameter on cardiac computed tomography in healthy asymptomatic adults: impact of age and gender. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 827–834.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Adir Y,
    2. Harai S
    . Pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic obstructive lung disease and idiopathic fibrosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2014; 20: 414–420.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Judge EP,
    2. Fabre A,
    3. Adamali HI, et al.
    Acute exacerbations and pulmonary hypertension in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 93–100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Sprunger DB,
    2. Olson AL,
    3. Huie TJ, et al.
    Pulmonary fibrosis is associated with an elevated risk of thromboembolic disease. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 125–132.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kizer JR,
    2. Zisman DA,
    3. Blumenthal NP, et al.
    Association between pulmonary fibrosis and coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 551–556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Han MK,
    2. McLaughlin V,
    3. Criner GJ, et al.
    Cardiovascular involvement in general medicine conditions. Circulation 2007; 16: 2992–3005.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Palmieri V,
    2. Bella JN,
    3. Arnett DK, et al.
    Aortic root dilation at sinuses of valsalva and aortic regurgitation in hypertensive and normotensive subjects: the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network Study. Hypertension 2001; 37: 1229–1235.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Olsson C,
    2. Thelin S,
    3. Stahle E, et al.
    Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: increasing prevalence and improved outcomes reported in a nationwide population-based study of more than 14,000 cases from 1987 to 2002. Circulation 2006; 114: 2611–2618.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Liu K,
    3. Wang Z, et al.
    Computed tomography measurement of pulmonary artery for diagnosis of COPD and its comorbidity pulmonary hypertension. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2015; 10: 2525–2533.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ng CS,
    2. Wells AU,
    3. Padley SP
    . A CT sign of chronic pulmonary arterial hypertension: the ratio of main pulmonary artery to aortic diameter. J Thorac Imaging 1999; 14: 270–278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Truong QA,
    2. Massaro JM
    3. Rogers IS, et al.
    Reference values for normal pulmonary artery dimensions by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: the Framingham Heart Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 147–154.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Next
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 62 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 62 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pulmonary artery size as a predictor of outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Pulmonary artery size as a predictor of outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Stephanie Shin, Christopher S. King, Nitin Puri, Oksana A. Shlobin, A. Whitney Brown, Shahzad Ahmad, Nargues A. Weir, Steven D. Nathan
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2016, ERJ-01532-2015; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01532-2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Pulmonary artery size as a predictor of outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Stephanie Shin, Christopher S. King, Nitin Puri, Oksana A. Shlobin, A. Whitney Brown, Shahzad Ahmad, Nargues A. Weir, Steven D. Nathan
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2016, ERJ-01532-2015; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01532-2015
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Interstitial and orphan lung disease
  • Pulmonary vascular disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Lung volumes and survival in chronic lung allograft dysfunction
  • Automated quantification of radiological patterns predicts IPF survival
  • Aspergillus fumigatus in COPD
Show more Original article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society