Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

A comparative study of two- versus one-lung ventilation: for needlescopic bleb resection

H. Kim, H.K. Kim, D-Y. Kang, D-K. Lee, Y.H. Choi, S.H. Lim
European Respiratory Journal 2010; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00056810
H. Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.K. Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kimhyunkoo@korea.ac.kr
D-Y. Kang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D-K. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y.H. Choi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.H. Lim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of two-lung ventilation with low tidal volume anaesthesia compared to one-lung ventilation used for needlescopic bleb resection.

Patients with spontaneous pneumothorax that underwent bleb resection with a 2 mm thoracoscope were enrolled. During the operation, the tidal volume was set at 4.0 mL·kg−1 in the two-lung group and 8.0 mL·kg−1 in the one-lung group; the respiration rate was set at 23/min and 12/min, respectively, at the same FiO2 (50%).

A total of 108 patients (55 patients in the two-lung group and 53 in the one-lung) were included in this study. The airway pressure was significantly lower in the two-lung group (8.0±3.3 mmHg, 24.0±3.9 in one-lung, p<0.001). The time from endotracheal intubation to the incision was 17.1±4.0 minutes in the two-lung group and 35.3±7.6 in the one-lung, significantly different (p<0.001). However, the operation time was not different in comparisons between the two groups. Therefore, the total anaesthesia time was significantly longer in the one-lung group (77.9±21.6 minutes, 64.9±14.7 in two-lung, p=0.002).

Needlescopic bleb resection using two-lung ventilation anaesthesia with low tidal volume was technically feasible, cost effective and time saving compared to one-lung ventilation anaesthesia.

  • Anaesthesia
  • pneumothorax
  • ventilation
  • video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
  • ERS
Next
Back to top
Vol 61 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 61 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A comparative study of two- versus one-lung ventilation: for needlescopic bleb resection
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A comparative study of two- versus one-lung ventilation: for needlescopic bleb resection
H. Kim, H.K. Kim, D-Y. Kang, D-K. Lee, Y.H. Choi, S.H. Lim
European Respiratory Journal Jan 2010, erj00568-2010; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00056810

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A comparative study of two- versus one-lung ventilation: for needlescopic bleb resection
H. Kim, H.K. Kim, D-Y. Kang, D-K. Lee, Y.H. Choi, S.H. Lim
European Respiratory Journal Jan 2010, erj00568-2010; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00056810
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung structure and function
  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Lung volumes and survival in chronic lung allograft dysfunction
  • Prediction of new-onset asthma and nasal allergy
  • Mortality and causes of death in HIV/tuberculosis patients
Show more Original article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society