Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Assessment of the relative systemic potency of inhaled fluticasone and budesonide

M Boorsma, N Andersson, P Larsson, A Ullman
European Respiratory Journal 1996 9: 1427-1432; DOI:
M Boorsma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N Andersson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Larsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Ullman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Studies using dry powder devices have suggested that fluticasone propionate (FP) has a greater systemic effect than budesonide (BUD). The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the relative systemic potency of FP and BUD from their respective pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). A placebo-controlled, open, randomized, cross-over study was conducted in 21 healthy male volunteers. Placebo, BUD (200, 400 and 1,000 micrograms b.i.d.) and FP (200, 375 and 1,000 micrograms b.i.d.) were inhaled for 4 days, with a wash-out period of at least 3 days between treatments. Blood samples for cortisol analysis were drawn during the last 24 h of each treatment period. Cortisol levels, measured as 24 h pooled plasma cortisol, were statistically significantly lower (p = 0.0001) for all dose levels during FP pMDI treatment (21, 39 and 84% suppression from placebo) than during BUD pMDI treatment (1, 3 and 27% suppression from placebo). The relative systemic potency FP:BUD was 3.7:1 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.9-4.8)). The relative systemic potency based on the single 08:00 h samples was 5.2:1 (95% CI 3.0-9.3). In conclusion, in healthy male volunteers using pressurized metered-dose inhalers, fluticasone propionate was shown to have a stronger systemic effect than budesonide.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 7 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of the relative systemic potency of inhaled fluticasone and budesonide
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Assessment of the relative systemic potency of inhaled fluticasone and budesonide
M Boorsma, N Andersson, P Larsson, A Ullman
European Respiratory Journal Jul 1996, 9 (7) 1427-1432;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Assessment of the relative systemic potency of inhaled fluticasone and budesonide
M Boorsma, N Andersson, P Larsson, A Ullman
European Respiratory Journal Jul 1996, 9 (7) 1427-1432;
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Lung volume reduction surgery versus conservative treatment in severe emphysema
  • Inhaled isotonic alkaline versus saline solution and radioaerosol clearance in chronic cough
  • Dietary supplementation with fish oil rich in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in children with bronchial asthma
Show more Clinical Trial

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society